Is there such a thing as a good psychopath?
Lizards.
I think so. I mean, if you move past the fact that ‘psychopath’ is more or less defined as evil. But what about a person who lacks any sort of emotional warmth or empathy? Couldn’t this person use his intellect to make the choice of doing the right thing? Couldn’t this person be taught – by himself or others – to mechanically follow a righteous path? Or is it true what Robin Williams says to Matt Damon in Good Will Hunting: that you can never substitute the mind for the heart? that you can know everything there is to know about a thing and still not grasp the feel of it?
Lizards.
Well, the author Warren Hammond is banking that you can accept the notion of a good psychopath. The protag, one Juno Mozambe, certainly fits the bill. He’s a dirty cop, an ex-enforcer, whose best trait is loyalty, backed up by a strong right hook. A good character for this sci-fi noir tale of murder and corruption. I’d call it LA Confidential with sci-fi trappings, but that’d be an insult to both LA Confidential and sci-fi trappings.
Lizards.
Which isn’t to say that it’s a bad book. It’s as solid as they come. But there’s no spark to it. Raymond Chandler, one of the founding fathers of noir, wrote, “In everything that can be called art there is a quality of redemption.” He continued, “But down these mean streets a man must go who is not himself mean, who is neither tarnished nor afraid.” And later concludes, “The story is the man’s adventure in search of a hidden truth…”
Lizards.
Unfortunately, none of this applies to KOP. Juno Mozambe is mean and tarnished and afraid. He searches for no hidden truth. There is no quality of redemption in this story. It becomes quite clear, once mysteries begin getting revealed, that this is the case. It is, in the end, a straight-forward story of two detectives doing the proper legwork and getting their perp.
Lizards.
A good noir is more that, isn’t it? A good noir is imbued with the qualities of Romance. I don’t mean kiss kiss romance, but Romance of the Tolkien, Shakespearean, Homeric sort. The world is a place of dark chaos and the detective moves through it like a mean ol’ lighthouse. He is a blood-stained knight fighting the good fight against Entropy. A good noir book acknowledges the grime, muck, and corruption of daily life, yet it seeks ever to rise above it. Good noir shows the reader the attitude necessary to live in a dirty world and still do good.
Lizards.
KOP has none of that. It tells you a whole lot of nothin’ about how to deal with the crap of the world. I never could put my finger on exactly what is wrong with KOP, why it felt so lifeless. But if I were forced to offer some diagnosis, it’d be something like: KOP is a genre boilerplate, through n through, and it’s rife with plot errors and poor focus.
Lizards.
For example, from the backcover: “The colony world Lagarto boomed when an indigenous plant was discovered to yield a uniquely intoxicating brandy… but when Earth synthesized a copy, Lagarto’s economy crashed.” Okay. Cool. Strange that that’s the first sentence but whatever. And then later on page 54: “Somebody had smuggled a pair of brandy tree saplings offplanet, and soon after all the settled planets began raising their own fruit.” Wait what? Did Earth synthesize a copy or was the sapling just transplanted? A minor detail, surely, and true it is. But it’s characteristic of an inelegance that spreads throughout the book. The protag’s shaky gunhand is mentioned over and over, to the point where I’m thinking okay this is gonna play a major part in a major standoff. Nope! Turns out no one gave a damn about it actually. Juno’s shaky hand caused him to miss ONE shot, but it didn’t matter.
Lizards.
OKAY. ENOUGH WITH THE F#(*ING LIZARDS. actually, damnit, I give up on this review. Here it is in TEN words:
Lizards. Lizards. Lizards. Lizards. Shaking fist. Lizards. Lizards. Offworlders. Lizards. Offworlders.
BAM. KOP EXPERIENCE.
Honestly, you wanna read some sci-fi noir? Read Altered Carbon. It’s better in every way. Except that it mentions lizards fewer times. So… still better in every way.