Years ago, I took this skills assessment test that determined (A) I am not very observant and (B) I am lacking in foresight. I didn't care so much about the former (the unobservant never do) but the latter concerned me. I was told to take up chess.
Chess books are, in general, very notation-heavy. I am told the notation becomes quite easy to read once you get the hang of it, but I don't love chess, so I chose this book because it used photography instead of notation.
This book is useful in a few key ways: First, it teaches you the basics of chess - and by "basics", I mean beyond the moves of each piece. You learn about developing your pieces, activating the minor pieces before Queens and Rooks, fighting for the center, pawn structure, and basic middle and end game strategies. Second, it provides a scattered, but nonetheless interesting, historical account of the game, including which openings were popular in the 1500's, etc.
I soon played Apple's chess program (set to a moderate difficulty) and was handily defeated - not once, but five or six times. So, to sum up, the book is good at teaching fundamentals, but developing an intuition for the game realistically requires lots (perhaps years) of practice.