We're all legalists. That is the essence of Baker's book. Beginning with the rampant, extreme legalism in Honduras, where he spent time as a missionary, Baker points out that North American Evangelicalism exported itself to south and central America, and that we are responsible for the legalism we see growing in Christian churches around the world. He points out that many of us were raised in fundamentalist churches, then go off to college and find out that it's actually okay to drink and smoke, and we respond by condemning the parents and fundamentalist churches of legalism, not realizing that we have simply transfered our legalism from one place to another. We're not actually free of our legalistic mindset, we've simply interchanged one set of rules for another.
Seeking a positive solution, Baker walks us through Galatians in its original context and shows that Paul was countering a community based upon the enforcement of rules with the community of the Spirit, which begins, continues and ends in the grace and forgiveness of God.
He points out that adherence to external rules gives the superficial appearance of true community, but at the expense of the internal misery of the people. Such external rules create tight-knit churches that are based on a system of shame and meritorious reward; one must keep the rules to "stay in" the fellowship, which forces the struggles with sin underground. We begin to bear heavy internal shame we cannot express, for fear that others will exile us from the community for not being "perfect," we suspect we are alone (even though everyone in the church feels the same way), and all the rest of it.
Baker describes this sort of community as a building with thick, high walls. People inside must maintain certain rules to remain inside, and people outside looking on begin to think they must reach a certain stage of righteousness before coming into the church. This really hit home for me. How many people in our own neighborhoods believe church to be a place all the "good" people go, and they would never be accepted there because they haven't reached the level of required righteousness?
Instead of this model, Baker proposes the Biblical way of being the church, which is a place for broken and wounded sinners who have been "forgiven." Instead of church being a place of enforcing moralistic rules, we should be churches and communities of transformation, bringing in the vilest and most broken of people and, through grace, prayer and example, helping them to transform their lives in the power of Spirit.
When this sort of church was described to a church of Hondurans, many of them gave huge, wistful sighs and said, "wouldn't that be a beautiful church." Wouldn't it indeed?