I think this book means to do well, and its by a "beloved author", but, oh my did it have flaws. First off, it's shallow and too simple. I know it is for children, but there is no reason to weaken a story, or to dumb it down. Yes, I appreciate that this is a clean book, without as much as even a kiss or hand holding. I like that because clean is hard to find, and as a 6 th grade teacher, a necessity. It wasn't necessary to describe any abusive situations in Hollis' life (she is a foster child), but there was nothing even hinted at. Hollis likes to run away. She has run away from many foster homes in her 12 years. Why? She is afraid of becoming emotionally attached. Makes sense, but no where in her back story do we see an instance of her living happily with a family and being torn from them (which is entirely plausible in the world of foster care). There's just no evidence to back up her feelings.
The entire story I felt much like Josie, the aging foster mother who has dementia. I felt I was floating along in the story, but didn't really know what was going on. The pacing felt off. The story is told as a flip flop from the present to the past. At first, the past seems like a distant memory, but then you realize that Hollis is simply remembering the previous summer (of only a few months ago) when she lived with a pre-adoptive foster family. Except Hollis ran away and now is with Josie. By the end of the story, the problem is simple. Josie can't care for Hollis, so Hollis has to go live with Eleanor, but Hollis gets Josie to drive them north and "escapes" before having to move.
And of course there is a happy ending.
Now let me tell you about the nit-picky things that pulled me from the story. First off, I took classes and was certified as a foster mother. So I've met caseworkers. They dress neatly, not in food stained sweats as Giff describes them. They are way over worked, but let me tell you they'd notice if the foster mother had dementia to the level Josie is described as having. Finally, just because Hollis "chose" to run away, does not mean she would get the final say in where she lived. The family court judge would decide, and in this story, the Regans dearly want her, so of course they'd have been in court or in meetings working to get Hollis back.
When Hollis and Josie run away, Hollis goes to the "summer house" which is four miles from the Regan's "winter house". The police are looking for her, but no one checks the summer house, not even the Regan's. That's just plain senseless and weak writing. Later in the story the author describes the summer house as having a broken window and snow causing water damage that wasn't noticed until May. Ummm, if I owned two houses four miles apart, I'd be checking in on my house to make sure it was wintering all right.
Don't even ask me how much gas Hollis paid for on Long Island, but strangely, after the trip of about 175 miles they were on empty. What a gas guzzler!
Hollis heats soup on a stove, she calls a purse a pocketbook, she desires just one egg then she could make something delicious to eat. Ummm, is she 12 or 70? Hollis and Stephen (who we assume is also a foster child) walk 4 miles to the town to a store. They're 12, there not your children legally, but you are responsible for them. Should they really walk that far alone? Then there is Josie. Josie is a lovable character, really, my heart goes to her and so did Hollis'. It was a turning point for Hollis to care for another. Being protective made her more able to accept being protected. I like that part of the tale.
But the nitpick: Maybe Josie worked 44 years as an art teacher at a private school and had no pension, but if she was a NYS teacher at a public school, she'd have no money troubles in retirement as described by Giff. Even if she wasn't a pensioner, she's have her Social Security and after working her whole life, it wouldn't be riches, but she wouldn't be worried about having the money to buy food. Of course, the county would be paying her the daily rate for boarding a child, and that's partly to buy the kid decent food.
Should you read this? Yes, it's easy and about 150 pages. It's good for a class with poor comprehension because it is simple. It could be used in grades 4-6. For an award winner, it just could have been better.