What did I just scar my eyeballs with.
This book takes a truly gorgeous story and twists it into a novel where:
- A young man is kidnapped and repeatedly raped by a cult who plans to slaughter him, and this is somehow supposed to be a good thing.
- His rapist agrees to run away with him. They run, and he abandons her, and this is somehow a Bad Thing.
- Somehow, all of my known ancestors were insulted within the first two pages.
Ignoring all of my many-and-detailed complaints about the portrayal of "Gawain", and of the overall historical accuracy, please allow me a moment to rip into the portrayals of the story's religions.
Firstly, the Druids are... just... no. I'm not even sure the author is aware that that was a real religion. A serious, scholarly, easy-to-research religion. There's only so much information we have on it, and she has managed to ignore all of it.
There were no fertility rituals involving teenagers and random, kidnapped, Catholic knights. (I don't think even the Snakes were so... weird about their human sacrifice.) They were very big on wedlock and virginity (remember how Merlin lost his powers?). Catholics, especially Catholics of Arthur's time, have absolutely no issue believing in magic in the same way we have no issue believing in gravity or hurricanes. We do, however, have more than passing objections to being kidnapped by cults.
Tl;dr: This is #Girlbossified Midsommor. If what you're looking for is a reference for your thesis on how Druids/Christians/men are portrayed in fiction, this might be a very useful read. Otherwise, go read The Loathly Lady, The Marriage of Sir Gawain, or the back of a cereal box.