It would be a gross simplification (as well as a mitigation of the crimes) to suggest that murder was simply a cost of doing business with Greg Scarpa Sr. While this may have been occasionally true, it would be erroneous to paint Scarpa with a romantic brush (as Mario Puzo did so elegantly with the Corleone family--"it's only business").
Ms. Harmon starts out her story with an idea that she doesn't uphold. She not only manages to romanticize Scarpa Sr., but the rest of his family as well. She gives us a family of liars, murderers, adulterers, and hypocrites, and yet, she wants us to feel sorry for them. Ms. Harmon extols on the love between Scarpa Sr. and Linda Schiro, but wholly dismisses the twisted relationship that they carried on, and caring nothing of the other family, the legitimate family, that Scarpa Sr. all but abandoned to be with his mistress.
Linda Schiro's hypocrisy when her son, Joey, was killed me me sick to my stomach. Ms. Harmon presents a woman that we should feel pity on, even going as far as to give us a throwaway paragraph that says that Linda, at her son's death, realized how the families of Senior's murder victims felt, and yet, she doesn't elaborate on that. Instead of portraying Schiro as the hypocrite that she is, uncaring that every person murdered by the men in her family was someone's daughter, someone's son. Linda Schiro and Greg Scarpa Sr. were dispicable human beings and their life paths (Schiro's bankruptcy and Scarpa's AIDS death) were karma coming back to bite them.
Romanticized the most in this book is Scarpa Jr. Ms. Harmon expects us to believe that he is really just a victim in all of this. Who cares that he murdered dozens of people, that he stole, extorted, and committed a number of other crimes. Yes, I am angered by the actions of the FBI (if I am to believe that Junior's accusations are true), but not because of how they've treated Junior. I am angry because, if the accusations are true, they could have stopped the attacks on 9/11 and saved so many lives.
Another major problem I had was with Ms. Harmon's lack of consistency. The biggest example of this is the description of Senior's place in the Mafia. On page 9, Harmon writes, "Although Greg Sr. never rose above the rank of soldier--the lowest rank among made men--he was considered a "good earner" (in the parlance of the Mafia)." Ms. Harmon also makes it clear at numerous times throughout the book that Senior was at the bottom of the totem pole, even mentioning that his son was ranked higher than him when Junior made "capo." However, throughout most of the book, she speaks of Senior as though he were a high-ranking officer within the organization. At one point, she even references someone else incorrectly calling Senior a capo, and yet, Harmon feels no need to fix that. She speaks as though Scarpa Sr. was underboss, ready to take over the Colombo family when he was merely a soldier. Even the subtitle of her book is misleading in accordance with the Scarpa family placement in the Mafia hierarcy. "Mafia Son - The Scarpa Mob Family, The FBI, and a Study of Betrayal." Again, Scarpa senior was only a soldier, Scarpa junior was only a capo. The Scarpa men were party of the Colombo crime family. They were not one of their own.
Ms. Harmon poorly put together this book. I feel as if she allowed herself to be seduced by the excitement and the intrigue surrounding the story of the Scarpa men and their relationship with the FBI. Instead of giving us an accurate portrayal of what happened, she gives us a one-sided love affair with the Scarpa men, with Scarpa Jr. even more romanticized than Puzo's Michael Corleone.
This book was a definite disappointment. The only positive was that it lends to be a quicker read than most Mafia books, and I can only attribute that to the romantic feeling of the book as opposed to having a lot of journalistic qualities.