Deals with the central question of whether the US military should be utilized in non-combatant capacities overseas. The author argues that the security landscape has changed — war and peace aren’t discrete, and we often occupy a gray space in between. Since many violent threats are founded in areas facing extreme insecurity, the US military can “nip this in the bud” so to speak by building schools, vaccination campaigns, medical help, and HIV/AIDS awareness measures. He delves into the relationship between State, DOD, and USAID in the logistics and execution of these programs, all the while emphasizing the need for collaboration with local NGOs, international organizations, etc..
Of course, there are some who argue that the military’s sole focus should be warfighting, and that any involvement other than that inevitably detracts from combat preparedness. However, the author counters that addressing insecurity overseas through humanitarian means today could mean preventing an existential threat to the homeland in 30 years time.
Secondary emphasis is on the role of military training and capacity building programs with foreign counterparts (ex: JTF-HOA’s EASWIO program, which hosts military, civilian, and port authority conferences with partner nations re: maritime issues such as piracy). Signals shift away from Cold War Era system, where the emphasis was on providing technology and supplies, towards a system focused on capacity building so that countries can address these issues without US aid in the future.
Written in 2010, so a little dated in some ways. An interesting read regardless.