To Rule the Waves tells the extraordinary story of how the British Royal Navy allowed one nation to rise to a level of power unprecedented in history. From the navy's beginnings under Henry VIII to the age of computer warfare and special ops, historian Arthur Herman tells the spellbinding tale of great battles at sea, heroic sailors, violent conflict, and personal tragedy -- of the way one mighty institution forged a nation, an empire, and a new world.
This P.S. edition features an extra 16 pages of insights into the book, including author interviews, recommended reading, and more.
Arthur L. Herman (born 1956) is an American popular historian, currently serving as a senior fellow at Hudson Institute. He generally employs the Great Man perspective in his work, which is 19th Century historical methodology attributing human events and their outcomes to the singular efforts of great men that has been refined and qualified by such modern thinkers as Sidney Hook.
Trigger warnings: war and everything that goes along with it.
3.5 stars.
If you're interested in naval history, read this book. If you're not SUPER DUPER interested in naval history, go ahead and bypass this one. Because, like, it's interesting. But it's also A LOT. It's nearly 600 pages (not including references) of "And then Britain built some battleships and blew everyone up".
Basically, it covers British naval history from the time of Edward III to the Falklands (though it does jump from World War II to the Falklands with no mention of what happened in between). I think the subtitle here is slightly misleading - it really doesn't explain how the Royal Navy shaped the modern world so much as it discusses events that shaped the modern world in which the Royal Navy was involved.
At times, it's a little on the dry side, but it's definitely comprehensive and easy to understand. So...there's that.
Highly readable account of the British navy from Drake to the Falklands. I really enjoyed this one. Absolutely recommended if you are into naval history or history in general.
Five emphatic stars delivered with the ear shattering crash of a thundering broadside of screaming metal from a 74 gun ship of the line!
This is an absolute must read for any fan of nautical history and if you are a fan of Patrick O'Brian (Master and Commander series) then you will enjoy the hell out of it as I did!
This book details the rise of the British Navy from the earliest days under Edward III until almost current day. The scope of the book is large, everything from trade to piracy, to colonization, to slavery, to exploration and everything in between. The author does a great job of narrating this history, I found this book to be incredibly entertaining. Plus it was chock full of interesting little historical tidbits that I love such as:
- When the Royal Navy examined Edward "Blackbeard" Teach's body after he died in battle they found that he had been shot five times ans been stabbed twenty five times before falling. Holy shit!
- .....crews often would strike or take down ship's sales so that it could not leave port until they were paid so that even today any kind of organized work stoppage is knows as a strike.
- but things were not all bad in the Royal Navy. Often times a sailor was given food that was more than he had eaten while on shore. Meals were served on square wooden plates three times a day...three square meals a day.
The history nerd in me loves these sorts of things!
Loved this book and can't wait to read more by this author!
The title overstates what the book is about, but if you are a bit of a British or naval history fan, this is a wonderful book to read. The "over-statement" part comes from the fact that the book does not in fact go into great detail about how the Royal Navy shaped the modern world. It makes that claim and offers good arguments for it, but they are not detailed arguments and they are not the meat of the book. The meat of the book is a history of the Royal Navy, from its beginnings in piracy, slave-trading, massacre and general high seas criminality (at least by later standards; standards enforced by the Royal Navy itself) to its final decline and fall in the postwar era (presided over, for a crucial period of time, by First Sea Lord, Lord Mountbatten, who performed the same service for another pillar of the British empire! though Herman does not bring up this interesting co-incidence). The author (an American, who also wrote the very interesting "Gandhi and Churchill", as well other books I have not read) is not politically correct and goes out of his way to show this in his unabashed hero-worship and his straightforward admiration (as long as they were successful) of daring or resourceful ventures, no matter whether they were piratical or imperialist; but he also goes out of his way to describe them (and their consequences) warts and all, without any attempt to hide or underplay the horrors. This may not be enough to satisfy many postmodern readers, but I was happy that as long as you read on, you almost always get all sides of every story. And this is a surprisingly comprehensive effort. Not just the adventurers and commanders and admirals, but also the intellectuals (including John Dee, Astronomer, mathematician and very prescient naval and imperial strategist!), the bureaucrats (Samuel Pepys is honored in great detail) and the ordinary seamen, get their due. The famous pre-20th century battles are all covered in detail, with the most hagiographic treatment (factually balanced, tonally hagiographic) being reserved of course for Nelson, climaxing with a detailed description of Trafalgar. While most of his hero-worship is factually accurate and the hyperbole is kept within bounds, he does go overboard with his comparison of Nelson with Napoleon, not just as wartime commanders but as a world historical figures, which is a bit too much. The wars of the 20th century are described relatively broadly, though Jutland is covered in detail; as is "operation Catapult" and the sinking of the Repulse and the Prince of Wales in WW2. Otherwise, famous actions are generally covered in a few lines and sometimes not even mentioned (as with the battle of the River Plate, skipped completely). The book ends with the Falklands war, told entirely from an elegiac British point of view, but given all that came before, perhaps this too should be excused. Definitely worth reading if you are interested in the topic or in British history and recent world history in general (concurrent world events and politics is covered fairly well along with the naval story).
I'm not an imperialist...and I'm definitely anti-colonialist. I'm also a pacifist and a strong believer in mutual-alliances for defense (rather than unilateral actions), but this is quite possibly one of the best arguments I've read for the need of a global navy to provide freedom and security to the entire world.
Unfortunately, the downside of this becomes readily apparent, as the Pax Brittanica was used to build a global colonial empire, and the Pax Americana has been and is being used to build a world for global American hegemony.
But, there is a lot to be said for a strong navy (let's go with a multi-national, combined force under the auspices of the United Nations) to provide for economic security and freedom of the seas.
This is also just a really good book on about 450 years of British Naval History.
Having read extensively both history and historical fiction about the British Navy over the last 40 years, there was little that was new in Arthur Herman's book, but it was refreshing to take a wide view of the British Navy's history. Certainly there were gaps. Often I would find myself reading a paragraph focusing on a battle or event about which I had already read a complete book or several books. But there were some new insights and connections made about the British Navy's long history. For example, I had never read about the Falklands War and I really need to read more about Pepys's Navy. To Rule the Waves: How the British Navy Shaped the Modern World was well worth the read.
An immersive, well researched account of the Royal Navy and the ships, captains, and events that made history. The book is filled with details that enliven the story, but not so overwhelmed by detail that the the narrative bogs down. The author does an excellent job of explaining what happened and why, and also the potential historical consequences if things had turned out differently. Many pivotal battles hinged on a random change of wind, an unexpected storm, or a misunderstood signal, while others were the straightforward result of discipline, training, and superior seamanship. Highly recommended.
A fantastic account of the birth and growth of the Royal Navy and its implications on the world. Arthur Herman did a wonderful job of making this in depth account such an enjoyable and easy read. Anyone who is interested in history or international relations ought to read this book. From Francis Drake to Horatio Nelson to present day, To Rule the Waves was a magnificent piece of historical literature greatly educated me on the effects that the British Royal Navy has had not only on the world, but specifically, the United States as well. Fair warning though, as you move further into the book, you will notice a bias on Mr. Herman's part against the U.S when it comes to the Royal Navy. If you can look through the bravado and see the history behind it, then I imagine that you will enjoy this as much as I did.
A fluid narrative survey that reads easily, but leaves something to be desired in its exploration of larger themes. Herman seems to suggest that the Royal Navy lost influence after the world wars primarily because of choices made by policymakers rather than because of Britain's diminished economy relative to other powers or other systemic reasons; this is fairly characteristic of the depth of analysis of the narrative throughout the book. Granted it covers nearly 500 years in just under 600 pages, but detail errors and oversimplifications in areas about which the reader knows a little already may grate. That said, it tackles a big topic quite readably and it's not at all bad.
The book covers the navy from its beginning, when it really wasn't a navy, until the Falklands. You can tell the author has a deep abiding love and respect for it and a touch of bitterness for its course after WWII. He does not shy from some of its controversial past such as its role in conducting the slave trade before changing missions to end it. He also addresses a few of the myths.
Although the battles are not ignored or slighted the real meat of the book is how the Navy shaped Britain and its government and how the people shaped the Navy. He highlights how the Navy was, in so many ways, the defining institution of the country. While you have Nelson and Drake Cook you also get the men who shaped, cultivated, grew and protected the institution itself and how they did it.
He does not ignore the good fortune of geography that allowed a barbaric remote island to come to dominate the oceans and the world. He shows how even the different sections of the country responded better to the sea, and why, than others.
This is an excellent book, not a short one, but it is good from either the standpoint of general or military history.
A swashbuckling history more epic than the anything Swift, Stevenson, Forester, or O’Brien could devise, To Rule the Waves captures the iron will and dashing confidence of the Royal Navy through the centuries. Also charting the rise of the world’s greatest empire, this book captures the weather gage with Drake, unleashes its broadsides with Nelson, and refuses to strike its colours even through the Falklands. If you have any interest in naval tradition, maritime history, or the British Empire, this book is for you. Tally-ho.
Excellent history of the Royal Navy for someone who, like me, only possessed a cursory knowledge.
It is not a drama, so you’ll need a passion for history; but if you do, you’ll see the drama.
The Royal Navy shaped our world in so many ways...so we all know and others you will be surprised to learn. From “ruling the waves” to every day lingo.
A solid narrative on the history of the British navy, willing to point out its highest peaks and lowest lows. The book read more like an action film than a history book, but the focus on combat with personal accounts made for a really good read. I especially appreciated the epilogue of the Falkan War
This is a perfectly good bedside or beach side history read. There is nothing spectacular about it, there is at least one factual error that slipped through, but it was fun and held my attention all the way through.
Everything you wanted to know about the British navy from Sir Francis Drake to the Falkland Islands conflict. The book is very detailed and provides historic context to the massive influence England had on geopolitics because of its control of the seas.
A chronicle of Great Britain’s 450 year relationship with the sea, from before the time of Drake to the Falklands Island war with Argentina. It relates all the high points from the battle over the Spanish Armada, to Trafalgar, to Jutland, to the sinking of the Bismarck, while offering trenchant commentary on the characters, the policies, and the impacts of the British Navy.
This is a useful perspective on empire - and the "world order" we live in - delivered by a fine storyteller. Along the way, the reader is rewarded with insights into everything from common expressions in the English language that originated in naval practices, to the personal character and dramas of famous historical figures, to how American policy and markets participated in and served and expressed the needs and desires of the British world system of which - despite the political break - it was an active part and which indeed it has inherited.
From the book's "Introduction": "This book will show how a single institution, the British navy, built the modern global system ... by challenging and toppling the global system forged by Spain and Portugal in the age of Columbus. Then it reshaped the world ... to fit the needs and desires of the British Empire ... access to markets, freedom of trade across international boundaries, an orderly state system that prefers peace to war, speedy communication and travel across open seas and skies ... Other nations might have built a modern unified world, but they probably would not have done it as quickly, efficiently, elegantly - or as humanely. ... Through sea power even a small nation could dominate its neighbors, by controlling their access to resources while securing their own, and even a small nation could bend events, trends, geography, the globe itself to its will. ... In the sixteenth century, a handful of Elizabethan adventurers from Devon and Cornwall ... grasped these principles and used them to challenge the dominant world system of the day... They inspired their fellow Englishmen to believe they would one day ... rule an empire that would be aggressively English, militantly Protestant, and rely on control of the seas instead of phalanxes of standing armies. ... In the seventeenth century, the navy and sea power became irrevocable parts of the English national identity. ... The wars the Royal Navy fought against France in the eighteenth century only deepened the lessons of sea power. ... The world system that emerged after 1815 would be one increasingly reliant on the Royal Navy as international policeman. ... An empire, originally born out of ruthless ambition and brutality, had become the basis for a new progressive world order. ... [T]he sea remains the cornerstone of today's global system. Almost 95% of trade that crosses international boundaries is waterborne, as is 99.5% of the weight of all transcontinental trade. ... This is the story of how a navy forged a nation, then an empire - and then our world."
The ruthless ambition and brutality of the early British Empire is made plain, as is the early British navy's role in creating the evils it was later celebrated for fighting: piracy (pirates were encouraged as state policy and number among the early navy's famous heroes), colonialism (Britain's first colonies were inherited by the state from overreaching commercial ventures that had been supported by the state's sea power - for more about this, see also chapter 4 of John Darwin's "After Tamerlane"), the slave trade (before ending it, the navy served the goal of securing Britain's share of it), and so on. Also made plain is the connection between British and American empire: "...in August 1823, [British Foreign Secretary George] Canning wrote to the United States ambassador, suggesting that Britain and America declare that any attempt to reestablish Spain's empire in the Western Hemisphere would meet with a hostile response from both countries. President James Monroe consulted with former presidents Jefferson and Madison, who urged him to accept Canning's offer. But Secretary of State John Quincy Adams said the declaration should be by America alone. And thus the Monroe Doctrine was born, a British idea inspired by Canning's belief that a permanent world order would require a close cooperation between the two Anglo-Saxon Atlantic powers. ... America's first venture onto the geopolitical stage had taken place under the protection of British naval guns." (p. 438)
Read together with John Darwin's "After Tamerlane," "To Rule the Waves" rounds out a portrait of the origins and dynamics of globalizaiton. It is also helpful background for Adam Zamoyski's "Rites of Peace" and Daniel Walker Howe's "What Hath God Wrought," which - taken together - give a portrait of how the American and French revolutions affected the hearts and minds, habits and politics of the West (for which David Andress's "The Terror" is also helpful background). Without these portraits, citizens and elected leaders cannot consider themselves well-informed on the issues of our day.
A brilliant book spanning the birth of the British Royal Navy to the war for the Falkland Islands. Stunning in detail but written as if it were a novel, I loved every second I spent reading this book. I’d recommend it to anyone who loves history/military history.
It took me about three months to read this but that's not because of the book itself. This is a history of the British navy from Drake to the Falkland War. The subtitle oversells the book a little bit: I did not think the focus throughout was how the British navy shaped the world, although that was particularly true in a few specific instances. (More on that below.) But, regardless of the overreach of the subtitle, this is still an impressive book. Herman had to cover a lot of ground (well, water...haha!) and he did that well. The book can also operate as a summary of European history over the last 500 years since England and her navy was involved in most of modern European history in one way or another.
The book gave me a greater appreciation for how England, particularly her navy, prevented Napoleon from his ultimate objectives. Napoleon's defeat has become "underrated" in its importance. If you agree that most of the 20th century's history can be traced to World War I and what lead to it, then you'd probably agree that most of the 19th century's history (at least in the West) can be traced to Napoleon's ultimate defeat, which came about partly because of his own mistakes (Russia) but also because of how the English navy surrounded his empire like a vise, chocking off his resources. The story of how the navy did that fascinated me.
Tempted to give this a 5 star rating but couldn't quite do it. It's a very good history book, but I've read better. That said, Herman took on a lot in this book and he pulled it off well.
This was a thoroughly engaging and entertaining history of the Royal Navy from inception through the Falkland Islands War. Arthur Herman does a masterful job of telling a long and complicated history without bogging down into minutiae or losing the keen edge of narrative style which leaves the reader eager with anticipation for the next chapter. Although I am not British, by the end of the book I was somewhat melancholy of the passing of the once mighty Royal Navy into the mists and myths of time, a mere shadow of its once great might. I felt a lump in my throat reading of the fates of the HMS Implacable, as she was tugged to her final resting place. A relic of a glorious age in a world which had passed her by. I could not help but feel connected to the nameless, yet storied, tars who sailed under Drake, Hawk, and Nelson through my own naval service. Credit goes to the author for writing in such a way as to take the reader out of time and space. As the history wound to conclusion, I could not help but think of lines from William Manchester's biography of Winston Churchill, describing ordinary Londoners lining the procession route on the day of the great mans funeral: "The nation was bidding farewell both to a great Englishman and the greatness of England. When his flag-draped coffin moved slowly across the old capital, drawn by naval ratings, and bareheaded Londoners stood trembling in the cold, they mourned not only him and all he had meant, but all that they had been, and no longer were, and would never be again."
This book has been sitting on my shelf for years. I had read it once, most likely on an airplane as evidenced by the airline ticket bookmark.
As a retired Naval Officer, I found this book very enlightening as to why the US Navy does what it does today. Many of the traditions the USN observes began as part of the Royal Navy experience.
This book traces the the Royal Navy from its somewhat official beginnings in the late 16th Century up through the Falklands campaign in 1982. The likes of Drake, Cook, Vernon, Bligh, Nelson and other colorful figures of the Royal Navy are covered with great descriptions of the battles they fought against the other imperial powers and upstart colonialists of the time.
There are many parallels to be drawn with the US Navy. Both became uncontested masters of the sea in their time. However, times of extended peace inevitably lead to drawdowns and force reductions, only to leave their nations unprepared for the next conflict.
If you are a prospective Naval or Marine Corps officer, I suggest you read this as part of your professional education. It is well worth it.
I am surprised that, after 569 paperbacked pages, my lingering impression of this book is that it moved too quickly. It's no small feat to pack centuries of naval history into so short a tome, so I suppose I can't reasonably be disappointed. A fantastic read that had me making mental notes about specific incidents, individuals and eras to delve deeper into. Waves looks beyond the list of battles to the social, economic and political forces that drove and were driven by the Royal Navy on stages that ranged from local to the nation to the world as a whole. An excellent and highly recommended read for anyone looking for a page-turner on a subject that affects us today in ways I would not have guessed.
Excellent summary of the Royal Navy from its origins to 1982 and the Falklands War. Some riveting well-written stories of the exploits of the men who made the Royal Navy, but mostly a solid account of how the Navy played such a prominent role in the rise of the British Empire. As an aside, I was shocked to see at the end of the book that it was written by an American.
This is a great history of the British Navy (but also sheds some light on the US Navy) and is probably the best written book in the non-fiction history genre I have ever read. Arthur Herman makes Naval history into an interesting story and brings the legends of Naval history to life.
A wonderful look at the sometimes glorious past of the British Navy and its sad decline. Herman makes his point well about how much the Navy influenced the world both directly and indirectly.
The best parts of this book are the depictions of specific historical events and personalities—Drake's voyage around the world, the defeat of the Spanish Armada, Nelson at Trafalgar. Herman brings these episodes to life with vivid prose, describing in delightful, cinematic detail the reality of naval warfare in the Age of Sail. It's hard not to be engrossed by these stories, to confront the sheer gall it took to voyage over vast stretches of ocean or fight aboard a ship of the line in close combat. If you are interested in these kinds of details, in learning about the men (it is almost entirely men) whose decisions and victories shaped British naval history and are the source of its traditions, then you will like this book.
The trivia in this book is also fascinating, especially if you are unfamiliar with the origins of modern naval terminology and practice. Reading To Rule the Waves is an education in things like the weather gauge, naval ranks, gunnery, and ship-to-ship communications. (A tip: read this book before trying O'Brien's novels, which are much more enjoyable with a basic understanding of how the Royal Navy worked in the late 18th and early 19th centuries.) Herman likewise does an excellent job highlighting the relationship between naval development and scientific knowledge, including the implications for navigation, mapping and biology.
The book is less successful, however, in delivering on its subtitle. It fails to offer a convincing argument that the British navy shaped the modern world. Obviously, the Royal Navy and its predecessors were involved in numerous historically significant events, all of which Herman catalogues. But Herman is unable to make the case that the Royal Navy, as a distinct institution, should be considered an agent of world-historical change. It is one thing to say, for example, that modern history has been influenced by sea power. It is a much different thing to say that the Royal Navy itself is uniquely responsible for the current shape of the world. If the Dutch had maintained their naval ascendancy beyond the 17th century, would they have played a similar role in opening and protecting shipping routes? Maybe not, but the question is never considered. A similar problem is disentangling the Royal Navy from British foreign policy and military strategy: are the two synonymous or would British history be different had its naval forces evolved along different lines? Herman attributes much of the Royal Navy's success in the Napoleonic Wars to Nelson's personal daring and tactical genius. What if Nelson had been born in Toulon instead of Norfolk?
These examples point to the analytical ambiguity that runs through this book: Herman never articulates a convincing theory of endogenous institutional change that justifies positing the Royal Navy as an independent variable in world history. Instead, the term 'British navy' seems to be a catch-all for various disparate factors: the individual achievements of British naval heroes, the effects of technological developments (e.g. iron cannons, copper sheathed hulls), the geopolitical advantages of being located on an island, etc. All of this amounts to a post-hoc justification for Pax Britannica, rather than a consistent explanation for the Royal Navy as a cause of history.
While I had been looking for a book on the history of the British Navy, what I had honestly expected was that in this search I would find only drab reads of history, lacking the life and energy truly worthy of such a story. I began Arthur Herman’s, “To Rule the Waves: How the British Navy Shaped the Modern World” with this expectation firmly ensconced. To my absolute delight, I was completely wrong about the tone the book would set. Indeed, it carried me away, page by page, maintained and grew my attention and devotion to the history from beginning to end. This book, hefty in topic and detail, was well worth the read.
The British Navy, while not solely responsible for the development and growth of the British Empire, was arguably its most important facet and contributor. “To Rule the Waves” begins in the 16th Century, picking up at a time when the masters of oceanic discovery and military might were the Portuguese, and especially the Spanish. The book begins with the struggles between England and Spain, when the British “Navy” was more known for independent actions and near-piratical tactics of its engaging commanders. It carries through with conflict against the merchant fleets of the Netherlands, the repeated wars with France, the growth and development of overseas empire, all the way through WWI, WWII and the Falklands War. It truly is an epic tale.
The book achieves a masterful level during the story of the Battle of Trafalgar. However, the most engaging aspects of this battle, at least for me, were not those of the world famous naval conflict itself, but rather the two-year campaign that led up to this moment. It describes in detail the entire French ploy, under the leadership of Napoleon, to invade and occupy the whole of the United Kingdom; only to eventually be foiled by Nelson off the coast of Cadiz.
The other aspect of the history of the British Navy that the book does so well at revealing are the moments in between major conflicts. These were never sedentary moments. During these times there were major developments in tactics, warfare, gunnery, equipment, terminology, navigation, communication, leadership, rank, enlistment, and on and on. The book describes all of them in vivid detail. Especially interesting were the development of a tactical communication system used during Trafalgar, and the evolving rules on the Rum Ration.
This book is engaging and fun, and highly informative. I highly recommend this read!
Review of To Rule the Waves: How the British Navy Shaped the Modern World by Arthur Herman
Arthur Herman’s To Rule the Waves is a compelling exploration of how the British Royal Navy became the backbone of the British Empire’s rise to global supremacy. From its humble beginnings under Henry VIII to its technological dominance in the modern era, the Royal Navy was not just a military force—it was the primary driver of Britain’s imperial expansion, trade dominance, and global influence.
Herman masterfully traces key historical events, including the defeat of the Spanish Armada, the Napoleonic Wars, and Britain’s naval dominance during the height of the British Empire. Central to the book are the themes of innovation, discipline, and leadership, exemplified by figures like Horatio Nelson, who embodied tactical brilliance and unwavering courage. Herman also demonstrates how adaptability in the face of technological shifts—such as the transition from sail to steam—was essential to the Royal Navy’s sustained dominance.
The book goes beyond battles and strategies, delving into the economic and political consequences of naval power. It shows that Britain’s control of the seas meant control of global commerce, allowing it to build an empire on which “the sun never set.” The Royal Navy, as Herman argues, was not merely a symbol of power—it was the very foundation of Britain’s global supremacy.
Key Takeaways: • Naval dominance was the key to Britain’s global empire. • Technological innovation and strategic leadership were critical factors. • Britain’s ability to protect its trade routes ensured economic prosperity and resource control.
Final Verdict:
To Rule the Waves is an essential read for those interested in the strategic importance of naval power and how it shapes global history. Herman delivers a captivating narrative that highlights discipline, adaptability, and the strategic use of force—principles that are as relevant today as they were during the height of the British Empire.
Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5) – A powerful testament to how naval mastery built an empire.