When one is told about General Motors (GM), they may learn about a highly cooperative work setting or strong desires to accomplish tough goals within the company. General Motors is quite well known today for the vast array of car brands and technology that it has developed over the course of its existence. On the other hand, there are those who do not view GM as the prestigious company that others claim it to be. In J. Patrick Wright’s “On A Clear Day You Can See General Motors,” John Z. De Lorean provides his personal insights into what his experience as a GM employee was like.
De Lorean begins by explaining why he left General Motors, later delving into numerous different factors that bothered him about the company. He explains that the company promotes loyalty to executives over skill in the workplace, resulting in some less competent employees making the cut while more reliable ones do not. The executives are referred to as The Fourteenth Floor, a group that De Lorean would eventually find himself a part of. Despite this exclusive position, he found this to be a very boring and frustrating experience. There were many immoral decisions being made around the company that either hindered overall prosperity or attempted to deflect responsibility for any struggles away from The Fourteenth Floor. Many of De Lorean’s issues stemmed from his work ethic versus the overall company’s. The Pontiac and Chevrolet divisions of the company had been problematic for years, but De Lorean helped to drastically improve both divisions. He had also introduced a number of propositions that would reduce product costs and heighten efficiency across the company. These new ideas merely created more disagreements and discord between De Lorean and The Fourteenth Floor. De Lorean repeatedly mentioned how General Motors operated on a very intrinsic view on progress: GM runs the show and it will not entertain any outside ideas. These issues, alongside many others, prompted De Lorean’s departure from the company.
I’m not entirely sure how I came across this book. It happened to be available in my house, so I decided to give it a shot. I had heard of General Motors, and while I thought that it likely had some hidden problems that were not being addressed or discussed, I was intrigued by the exposé nature of this book. GM is also an incredibly large and prosperous company, so to see someone step forward and offer their thoughts and criticisms of the company was very surprising and attention-grabbing. On top of this, I largely had no knowledge of how GM was constructed or how it went about running the company, and I figured that this book would provide good insight into that organization. Upon reading the table of contents, it seemed that the book was about to offer a well-constructed critical assessment of GM. It is worth noting that “On A Clear Day You Can See General Motors” was published in 1979, meaning some of the criticisms could be rather outdated.
De Lorean’s account of his experience at General Motors feels like he is directly speaking to the audience. He does not mince words and is very down to earth in his arguments against GM. In many of his points, De Lorean first describes the context of the situation, moves into what is currently plaguing GM, and then follows up by detailing what should actually be happening. This is complemented by the strong organization and flow of the book as a whole. He begins by talking about the executives at The Fourteenth Floor before effectively contrasting their work ethic with his own. He then builds on this by describing his experience with improving the Pontiac and Chevrolet divisions before moving towards the conclusion by highlighting the continuous shortcomings of GM and what should be done to strengthen the company. Since the book is anecdotal in nature, De Lorean’s points against GM have more evidence and support since they originate from a man who personally went through seventeen years of service in the company. While he refrains from showing excessive emotion, it was clear to me that he was deeply frustrated by the company’s shortcomings and faults. De Lorean maintains a consistent voice throughout the book, which contributes to every chapter feeling unique and well developed.
Even with De Lorean’s strong voice, it became lost at points during the book. Some of the explanations and context that De Lorean detailed felt distracting to his overall message. While these were important to support how General Motors was incorrectly conducting its operations, some of them felt unnecessary because many points that he was making already had sufficient evidence to back them up. Some of these featured brief conversations that he had or quotes that he pulled from those that he communicated with. There were not many occasions where I felt that these added to the book, but they did not subtract from it either. It can also be somewhat difficult to gain a true understanding of some of the problems, particularly with the Chevrolet division and a compact car that GM was developing named the Vega. During the chapters where De Lorean discussed these ideas, he mentioned a number of car parts and included plenty of automobile jargon that can fly over the reader’s head if they do not have much of this knowledge. Of course, being an exposé into a large car company, this makes sense. However, De Lorean did not offer any brief explanations of why some of these features were important. I’m not saying that he should have paused to give a crash course on these features, but offering a quick description of a crossbow hemispherical cylinder head or a torque box would assist the reader’s knowledge.
“On a Clear Day You Can See General Motors” by J. Patrick Wright offered an overall fair reading experience. It was nothing amazing, but it also was not a complete drag, either. The book throws plenty of information at the reader, which may make it somewhat difficult to fully comprehend every individual problem that John Z. De Lorean explains. I personally have learned quite a bit about how General Motors ran its business back in the 1960s and early 1970s. While I believe that a number of those problems have been resolved, it leaves me wondering just how much of what De Lorean said still applies to GM today.