I thought this was a pretty useful book overall. I really liked some of the concepts about executive coaching that Mary speaks about. One of the key strategies for coaching executive that I learned from this was a triple approach of ensuring that you can make sure that you're working with the executive to understand what you can do to support them at a personal level. What you can do secondly to support them at their program or project level. And then thirdly what you executive coach can do to coach the executive at a company wide level so that they try to increase their brand in the organization. Setting up a way in which you can track against these three challenges and be able to give feedback in the moment sometimes and join the executive in the meetings is a key to making sure that that executive is aligned and on cue to hitting the targets that you've specified at the start of your engagement.
There were lots of other models in this book but for me the importance of having backbone and having those difficult conversations but doing it with empathy is a key part of beautiful conversations and something that the book also espouses.Anyway here are some of the best bits from the book:
They also suffer from a belief that they should not ask for help, which exacerbates their lonely at the top experience. Coaches of top executives needs to treat these matters with seriousness and without being intimidated by the issues themselves.
The coaching method outlined in this book follows four straightforward stages: the initial contract, planning contact, live action interventions and then debriefing. It's a very simple method.
Backbone is about saying what your position is, whether it is popular or not. Heart is staying in relationships and reaching out even when that relationship is in conflict.
I told bill in the presence of his team that it was time to name what is clear and unclear and what do we need? Also said that it felt uncomfortable, not because they were doing anything wrong because the situation was by nature unclear. It could also mean that they were on the verge of a burst of creativity because original thinking starts when they are willing to stop hanging onto familiar territory and start moving out into the unknown. I told bill to hang out in the confusion and hold less tightly to their needs to have clarity quickly. This is a bit like the concept created by Danny Meyer, the restaurateur, which is about loving the problem.
I admired their development of a fluid structure that serviced and anticipated changes. And I was glad that we all had continued to manage the ambiguity by staying in conversation, distinguishing what is known and not known, clarifying plans to move ahead, and stating the needs that people had of others.
Good ways of dealing with anger: identify the trigger to your reactivity. Then figure out your typical reaction to that trigger. Choose an alternative response to get you started down a different path. Same track with the goal you have for yourself in the session. You also have to be willing to enter a void before getting to the other side. Increasing your tolerance means strengthening and emotional muscle that you can hold on in that void. It's more than doing any specific action.
However even an incremental increase in tolerance can provide a geometric gain in bringing newness to the situation either a dramatically different resistance, or a breakthrough with the client or both.
Once you have identified your reactions you can do the last two steps. Tell the leader your direct experience and link it to her work world. You might say for example I hear you talk about your successes but I'm not seeing the connection to the topic we're discussing. Frankly I'm starting to guessing why you're doing it. Maybe your team tries to second guess your you sometimes too of course you can always take a chance when you use immediacy. You could be way off or two directly on target. You could offend your client. You could scare her off by getting too intense too soon. In the best case you could catch your clients attention in a new way and engender an invitation from the leader to get more of that kind of feedback from you without using immediacy, it's impossible to get to the heart of some issues. Immediacy helps a client identify her knee jerk patterns and helps her make new choices it takes tremendous presence to do this as a coach using the ability to observe patterns of interaction and reactivity in your client while you are also participating and interacting with her. When you do have the presence to stop the action conversation to report your observations and reactions, you evoke more presence from your client. The trance of her reactivity may break long enough for her to see herself in a new way. This can be a tremendous gift to your client. It requires courage to speak on the part of the coach and courage to listen on the part of the client.
Interactional fields take a life of their own even as individuals in an organization, and go. I once worked for a restaurant that maintained the same level of service and quality through several years. Though they aspire to be world class theywe're good but not exceptional. The managers and 70% of the staff left and newcomers took their place. The forcefield remained the same: good but not excellent. There were factors in place affecting system that were more enduring than the individuals within it.
What do these interactional webs have to do with coaching? Practically everything. First it's critical to know how organizational systems affect you: the ones you are in and Co create. Reactivity also shows where you are particularly vulnerable in a system and respond with kneejerk habits. When you maintain a self differentiated presence you can feel the effects of a system to avoid reacting automatically. The more you develop the four approaches to presents the greater is your effectiveness in maintaining your equilibrium in the systems force field.
Although Barbara talked about excellence she did not insist on behaviors that would get their. She didn't challenge the actions or inactions of team members leading to their mediocrity. That was her side of the avoiding. The new team members avoided challenging each other to higher performance.
Homeostasis is a fancy word for the forces keeping the system at its current level of functioning, thus preserving the established patterns
At first it's easy to feel gloomy about systems: the thing is bigger than all of us. however there is a common proverb of system thinking: the unit and focus for change as a system and the agent of change the individual.
New line leaders get this kind of immediate feedback so rarely that it's gets their attention and test the cliche they often used but do not live by: I don't just want another yes man. I call it the stick my finger in their chest moment which can be delivered at once boldly and respectfully, directly engaging the presence of the client. He may step into the moment seeking what information and learning about himself. When this happens he will say something to the effect of : this is the kind of feedback I can do something about. The three necessary conditions for a successful coaching contract are the willingness of the leader to :number one seem self honestly number to own his part in the patterns of play and number 3 receptive to immediate feedback.
Goals: the business results needed. Find out what Team behaviours needs to be different to accomplish the results. Explore what personal leadership challenges the executive faces in improving those results and team behaviours. Identify specific behaviour is the leading needs to enhance or change in himself.
When executive connects improvements and his leading to specific work goals he also builds in his own biofeedback system.
Management competencies code on Strategic Thinking, customer relations, vision project management, facilitating meetings, decision making, utilising staff in change agent role, promoting conversations, coaching, thoughts management, advocacy, team coherence comma systems functioning.