***SPOILERS****
Summary Review:
Sparrow Rock is a mixture of horror combined with a coming of age story. To me, the central theme is Peter’s personal growth, in the backdrop of the massive destruction of mankind by a Nazi-type group seeking human cleansing in order to rebuild the “superior race”. This involves using nanotechnology to create smart insects that takes over bodies.
I was expecting one horrifying event after another in this postapocalyptic horror. As a pleasant surprise, I find that it is mainly a story about Peter’s past and his development as he moves through this holocaust. The story is told through the eyes of Peter, as he journeys from a boy shattered by his father’s abuse to a man responsible for the remaining group’s survival. Peter’s voice is affecting and lyrical as he moves from impressions of the present and connects with past reflections. Each character in the story have their role to play. Jay and Sue have some connection and information to the plot for mankind’s cleansing. Jimmie is the weak and nervous character. Dan is the born leader whose veneer of strength became cracked, thereby transferring the mantle of leadership to Peter. And Tess is the ever-present calming force that we find is Peter’s alter ego. While the characters could be more original and complicated, they are portrayed realistically and sympathetically. These believable characters can live right next door. I would have liked for the character of Tess to have more of a presence to justify the plot twist at the end in which we find out that Tess is really from Peter’s imagination. My reaction was more of a “So?”
The idea of using nanotechnology to create smart destructive insects is interesting. However, I’m left hanging with my question of how these things were controlled. I want to have more vivid technical details. This creates an inability for me to connect securely with the idea of destructive nanotechnology. I’m also not convinced of the power of a Nazi group to create such massive destruction, or their ability to invest in a technology that created that much damage. The explanation is not vivid or clear enough to make me believe it. What I’m left with is more of a Night of the Living Dead meets The Swarm.
Despite those weaknesses, Nate Kenyon’s strong gift for moving prose makes this an engaging and poignant story. I thoroughly enjoyed the story in terms of Peter’s quick initiation into manhood as he confronts his past. This writer has a gift for touching the reader that is beyond the horror genre.
**********************************************
Past Notes As I'm Reading:
I decided to keep my notes on here before I write my review. Those yellow stickies were getting out of hand.
1. Realistic contemporary voice in a believable tone of someone in the middle of Armageddon keeping a journal. I can believe that it is happening today with the high schoolers in this book.
2. The challenge for the writer is that he's covering a topic that's been covered many, many times in books, movies, etc. It's a timeless topic, the end of the world. Since civilization began, people have been worried about the end of the world, but here we are. I'm curious to see how he would develop a voice unique from the others.
3. I like that it is realistically philosophical in nature, of what an insightful young person would think if he were to face the end of the world. I just passed a part where he was talking about humor, which is in sync with my idea of humor, its importance and the fine line it dances over.
"There's a razor-thin line between hilarious and offensive when you're talking about death..."
"...Humor is a way of facing the pain without the fear or breaking it down in ways we can handle..."
So far, this book is believable as to what could possibly happen if young adults were to be caught in a shelter at the end of the world. Its pitch is just right. It's not overly dramatic, as could happen when depicting a tragedy.
************CONTAINS SPOILERS MOVING FORWARD***********
4. On p. 93 Ewww. Squished rats. And the rats were biologically dead when they attacked the kids. What is going on? Now I see that this is not the typical Nagasaki atomic bombing, where the skin melts off the body. What could have caused a corpse to be animated? I'm wondering whether the explanation would be believable to a science layman. I like how Nate went through the visceral details of the attack of the rats, the squished rats, and the kids' reactions. I feel he spent a lot of time imagining and walking through the scenario in order to get as much visceral detail as he did. He might even have stomped on some rotten apples to get the sound of a squished rat's head. That is horror well done. The magic of horror is the visceral effect, the fear and the disgust, and perhaps the guilt that you're enjoying such fear and disgust. Another magic of horror is the set up for a horrific surprise. Nate is now setting us up for something. The fun begins.
5. On p. 194. Now I find out more of what’s going on. Nanotechnology is involved. The only thing I know of nanotechnology is that it involves being able to control matter on an atomic and molecular scale. That could apply to genetics. So, according to this book, nanotechnology modifies the structure of insects so that they act as organized destroyers, perhaps being controlled by somebody or something. My layman mind says that is plausible, since nanotechnology is not fully known, although currently such control is not possible. The horrible thing about these insects is that they can enter a body and control it. That is why those dead rats can go on the offensive. I can believe that.
I enjoy Peter’s philosophical ruminations throughout the book because I’m that kind of a person. Nate has Peter made some beautiful descriptive thoughts. At some point, though, the ruminations can get too long. I want the ruminations to be interrupted more often with a change of scene, or some sort of a distraction. My thought goes to Richard Matheson’s I Am Legend, where he is reflecting on the horror of being the only normal human left, but the pace is constantly interrupted by focus, other characters, etc. I realize it’s difficult to have lots of action when the only setting is inside of a bomb shelter. Frightening things were happening. It’s not the events that I want changed. I feel that the pacing of the writing needs to be changed somehow to lessen the monotony of ruminations.
The characters were depicted realistically and sensitively. I feel that I know them, that they can live right next door. Nate has built each character for a purpose, with Peter having some sort of a connection to all of them. Because of his background, he was able to be the person they each go to as a confidant. Each character has a function necessary in an apocalyptic story, from a hysterical selfish guy to a born leader. Jay, the genius geek of the group, becomes the person that gives the reader insight to what is happening to them. The part where Jay makes the big revelation becomes too cliche for me. I think it’s because I’ve seen too many movies where one knowledgeable character blurts out the big secret that explains a lot of things. I prefer that the big secret is revealed in a less obvious way, although it’s kind of hard when you’re trying to tell people that nanotechnology is involved in this. At least in Dune, the complicated economic plan for Arrakis was explained in the form of a mirage of Kynes’ father lecturing him as he lays dying in the dessert.
We’re being set up for something to come up. There’s something about Sue’s grandfather being involved in all of this. And there’s talk of them leaving the hole since they found what looks like a hidden military base in Alaska. Will they leave the hole? Is there going to be another big revelation and surprise? I’m wondering why the U.S. is involved in this. If it hadn’t been for them not being able to pick up any radio signal with the exception of the military frequency, I would have thought that their small town was part of an experiment, and that the rest of the world is actually okay. But nope, it looks like the rest of the world is in trouble. But why would the U.S. government destroy its own people?