What do you think?
Rate this book


304 pages, Hardcover
First published October 5, 2010
In the years leading up to the American Revolution, Enlightenment liberals and dissenters were clamoring for full religious liberty--which means the elimination of official state churches, religious taxes, and religious test for service in public office. But the dissenting evangelicals, and most of the liberal allies, hardly imagined that separation of church and state meant that religion should be only private, personal, and apolitical. That concept would only appear more recently, in the twentieth century (40).Jefferson's "wall of separation" was designed top protect the religious liberties of all, not enforce secularism (52, 55). Prior to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, non-Anglican preachers could be fined for preaching the gospel. "Jefferson and Madison helped end legal penalties against dissenters and temporarily stop state funding for the Church of England (which would be called the Episcopal Church after independence was achieved), (54). See also pages 180ff for the route taken by many states.
By the war's end, Occom's dire predictions had come true. He believed that the American Revolution had damaged Native American communities more than any other force in his lifetime. Occom bitterly wrote that his former friend, the Presbyterian missionary Samuel Kirkland, 'went with an army against the poor Indians, and he has prejudiced the minds of Indians against all missionaries, especially against white missionaries, seven times more than anything, that ever was done by the white people (129).Kidd concludes chapter 6, "A Time of War" with these words: "Using God's might and right to justify one's cause can easily obscure the complexity or injustice of war. Providentialism was the most morally problematic religious principle of the Revolution (130).
The consequences of the Revolution for African Americans reveal the era's greatest moral failing. The moral struggle for independence implied a promise to end American slavery--a promise the Revolution did not fulfill. . . .The Revolution unleashed an unprecedented flood of antislavery thought, much of which came from Evangelical Christian sources" (148).While the challenge to slavery did not come from those notable champions of "freedom," it did from "northern evangelical Calvinists, the tradition that transformed Lemuel Haynes and many others into antislavery polemicist" (152). See also pages 165.