A fascinating collection of reportage on what might be investigative journalism's ultimate subject - human conflict that resulted in death, along with what caused it, and its aftermath. Beyond the obvious appeal of the subject matter, what makes Trillin's work itself unique is he doesn't write to record effective (or, for that matter, ineffective) law enforcement procedure or to build suspense around a mystery as it unfolds in chronological order. In fact, many of his stories result in acquittal or its situational equivalent, the outcome often referenced before it is explained fully, and several killings are hard to categorize as murder in the traditional sense. Far more of interest to Trillin is the culture of the places in which these killings took place, and in his thorough research of local histories and exhaustive interviewing of available sources, Trillin's work can only be compared to the absolute best of his genre in terms of always believably capturing the spirit of the setting. A recurring theme implied is the very subjective and flexible nature of the law as enforced by a jury of one's peers, with some victims' lives apparently being worth less than others, some defendants' lives worth too much to local society to squander with a finding of Guilty, and an invisible balancing act going on in the minds of their twelve peers who'd rather be elsewhere anyway. The only story in the collection that seemed like an odd one out was the final chapter, a colorful biography of woman who's been a longtime crime reporter with legendary lede-writing abilities in Dade County, Florida, in which the trade of crime writing is discussed more than anything else, but it's rewarding and inspiring enough to warrant its inclusion despite being slightly off-topic in the direction of meta. With or without it, Trillin succeeds at making crime writing seem utterly fascinating, as if behind every muted few column inches of horror in the newspaper lies a whole wealth of unique human experience, a culture that more or less drove its participants to their fate, and legal outcomes that are anything but certain, that we'd all know about and likely be able to empathize with, if someone would only track down the principal actors and ask the right questions.