What do you think?
Rate this book
Ark of the Possible: The Animal World in Merleau-Ponty
iArk of the Possibility The Animal World in Merleau-Pontyi explores the theme of animality in the philosophy of French phenomenologist Maurice Merleau-Ponty.
- GenresPhilosophy
121 pages, Unknown Binding
Published May 1, 2009
30 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
September 23, 2025
if you like this review i now have website: www.michaelkamakana.com
190118: sometimes the shorter a work of philosophy the more intense. if you read much usual philosophy you might get the impression this is only a world of human consciousness- particularly 'rational'- struggling how to live, and an absolute of some sort- 'Being', 'God'-that is either here somehow or not here or dead or sleeping or... this short text asserts a much more plausible model of the world including non-human animals and even plants, stones, etc....
rather than sum up all the relevant and powerful arguments as to why we should enable the beings of all animals, rather than focus on how we are not 'mere' animals but how we are, and this is not 'mere', i name the chapters: introduction: imagining animals, 1) God is world: implicit theology in m-p, 2) animal being in m-p, 3) phenomenological pragmatism, 4) thinking across species boundaries, 5) the earth as ground in m-p, conclusion: proto-ethics of incarnation...
intro) starts us on the history of how animals are thought, particularly in the modern west, 1) suggests m-p does not refer to usual absolutes but incorporates his later concepts of 'chiasm' and 'flesh', 2) argues how animals/humans are likewise 'in-the-world' and proud 'rationality' and 'communication' are narrow and androcentric (a dog is a very bad human but very good dog...), 3) finds commonalities with pragmatism of pierce et al. but i have never read him so cannot speak to this, 4) inter-species sympathy/concern begins with recognition of 'networks' of beings that humans require, 5) includes husserl's concept of 'this ground' where 'nature' has wider phenomenological meaning than the world 'outside' of humans, single, social. then m-p's 'gestural' communication of animals, conclusion) great core arguments on the relevance, value, necessity, to have thoughts about entire range of beings, ending with seven corollaries:
1) consciousness is not personal realm of thought but individual opening on meaningful world...
2) each/every phenomenon has style, particularity, virtue of being itself/connected to world...
3) multiple meanings/same thing, no separate worlds of thought, language, real- integrated...
4) species boundaries overlap, each species symbiotic/needs other species to live...
5) destruction species/earth has 'noumenal' impact as well as 'vital', species loss is world loss...
6) not all live, but all has meaning, every object also subject, pervasive generates 'meaning'...
7) humans not sole 'actors', animate/inanimate contribute 'meaning'...
well yeah, call me a hippy. i really love this focus on our shared world, not only on humans...
190118: sometimes the shorter a work of philosophy the more intense. if you read much usual philosophy you might get the impression this is only a world of human consciousness- particularly 'rational'- struggling how to live, and an absolute of some sort- 'Being', 'God'-that is either here somehow or not here or dead or sleeping or... this short text asserts a much more plausible model of the world including non-human animals and even plants, stones, etc....
rather than sum up all the relevant and powerful arguments as to why we should enable the beings of all animals, rather than focus on how we are not 'mere' animals but how we are, and this is not 'mere', i name the chapters: introduction: imagining animals, 1) God is world: implicit theology in m-p, 2) animal being in m-p, 3) phenomenological pragmatism, 4) thinking across species boundaries, 5) the earth as ground in m-p, conclusion: proto-ethics of incarnation...
intro) starts us on the history of how animals are thought, particularly in the modern west, 1) suggests m-p does not refer to usual absolutes but incorporates his later concepts of 'chiasm' and 'flesh', 2) argues how animals/humans are likewise 'in-the-world' and proud 'rationality' and 'communication' are narrow and androcentric (a dog is a very bad human but very good dog...), 3) finds commonalities with pragmatism of pierce et al. but i have never read him so cannot speak to this, 4) inter-species sympathy/concern begins with recognition of 'networks' of beings that humans require, 5) includes husserl's concept of 'this ground' where 'nature' has wider phenomenological meaning than the world 'outside' of humans, single, social. then m-p's 'gestural' communication of animals, conclusion) great core arguments on the relevance, value, necessity, to have thoughts about entire range of beings, ending with seven corollaries:
1) consciousness is not personal realm of thought but individual opening on meaningful world...
2) each/every phenomenon has style, particularity, virtue of being itself/connected to world...
3) multiple meanings/same thing, no separate worlds of thought, language, real- integrated...
4) species boundaries overlap, each species symbiotic/needs other species to live...
5) destruction species/earth has 'noumenal' impact as well as 'vital', species loss is world loss...
6) not all live, but all has meaning, every object also subject, pervasive generates 'meaning'...
7) humans not sole 'actors', animate/inanimate contribute 'meaning'...
well yeah, call me a hippy. i really love this focus on our shared world, not only on humans...
October 9, 2025
I’d recommend this book to everyone but especially those interested in environmental philosophy, phenomenology and (critical) animal studies. I am grateful to the author for writing this book, which I was able to read thanks to the hardcover library copy. My only complaint is that I simply cannot find an affordable paperback copy of it. I hope that Lexington books decides to publish it in paperback so that it is more accessible.
I will certainly use this valuable book as one of key resources in my dissertation.
I will certainly use this valuable book as one of key resources in my dissertation.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews