A disappointing effort to introduce the anthropology of law. It's a massive topic--after all, what even is "law"? Rosen's solution is the classic anthropologist's device: bop around time and space, breezily contrasting "some traditional African..." "medieval Christians," "Muslims in North Africa," "many tribes in New Guinea," "the British conception," and so on. Serious topics like colonialism vis-a-vis indigenous peoples in the Americas or South Asians vs. the British are evoked in an almost jaunty manner. There are so many interesting ideas to pursue here--the making of "facts," the role of power, questions of relationality--and yet, the result is scattered and unsatisfying.