I received my copy of Charlotte Hawkin’s The Tempest, through the Goodreads First Reads program.
I’ll begin this review by stating that I truly enjoyed this book as a work of romantic fiction and plan to read the other two Gisborne novels. I feel the need to specify that I enjoyed it as a work of romantic fiction because I am not entirely certain how to classify it otherwise.
Ms Hawkins declares in her Author’s Notes that she has been a lifelong fan of the tales of Sherwood Forest, preferring the villains over the heroic Robin Hood. She mentions that Richard Armitage’s portrayal of Guy of Gisborne in the BBC version of Robin Hood gave the villain a new depth of character and a legion of followers. As one of those obsessed fans of the BBC version, my own loyalties lay with Jonas Armstrong’s Robin. I fully appreciate the way in which a specific portrayal, whether it be Armitage or Basil Rathbone, can inspire a writer. A huge part of me wants to dissect the novel on historical accuracy, but this is a spin-off of the Robin Hood legend, a tale which is historically problematic to begin with. I do not believe that The Tempest is a work of fanfiction, as some reviewers have claimed. It is a love story between a misunderstood brooding hero and a spirited, stubborn heroine at the mercy of the values and laws of their time. That time just so happens to be the late 12th century, and those characters just happen to be associated with quasi-historical figures.
Guy of Gisborne is not only Master-at-Arms for the evil Sheriff of Nottingham, he is also his nephew, given in servitude to the sheriff by his father when he was just a boy, following the murder of his mother. Guy’s self-worth is undermined at every turn by the Sheriff, the public’s perception of him as a cold, merciless beast, and his own guilt over his inaction as a child, helplessly watching his mother’s murder. Yet there is more to Guy; deep down there is a man with a conscience, a man who just wants to be loved. For a short time, Guy is certain that Marian could be his salvation, but she turned out to be duplicitous, betrayed him and took her own life while in the Nottingham prison. Her loyalties were always to Robin Hood. Cassia is a young peasant girl who comes from a long line of healers. Her brother is friend to Robin Hood, which draws the negative attention of the Sheriff’s men. Rumours of witchcraft, which often follow female healers, coupled with the family’s association with Robin result in the Sheriff ordering Gisborne to set fire to their cottage, with Cassia and her grandmother inside. Gisborne initially follows orders but is overruled by his conscience and storms into the burning cottage to rescue the young girl and elderly woman, telling them to get as far away as they can.
Cassia’s family move to the forest and rebuild their lives, with an aunt living close by. Time passes, Cassia is now a young woman. Her brother and her young husband are presumed dead, having followed Robin of Locksley on Crusade in support of King Richard. She has many reasons to hate Robin Hood, and many reasons to admire Guy of Gisborne. When Gisborne is injured in pursuit of Robin Hood and left for dead by his own men, he is rescued my Cassia’s family. What follows is months of recovery during which Guy is nursed back to health by Cassia and his mood changes from suspicious to comfortable, surly to passionate. At this time, Guy is unaware that the woman he is falling in love with is the same young girl he once saved. Their romance up to this point is credible enough, but then drops off when Cassia’s brother and husband miraculously return home, hale and hearty, having been made landed nobility by the French crown. Edwin plans to pick up where he left off, unaware that his two weeks of pre-war marital bliss with Cassia has been destroyed by Guy of Gisborne. Cassia and Guy’s romance is thwarted by the Sheriff, by her family, by her husband and is only supported by her aunt Matilda. Once again Cassia survives a fire, this time being rescued by her husband with the help of Robin Hood.
My favourite part about this novel was the way that Ms Hawkins played with the Robin Hood legend, portraying Robin as egotistical, smarmy rat, and Guy of Gisborne as the brooding hero. I wish we’d seen more instances of Robin and Marian interacting with Guy, so that Cassia’s dedication to him could have shone all the more. While there were several plot points that I took exception to on the basis of historical accuracy, for instance, the lack of conviction regarding Cassia’s “witchcraft”, and the lack of concern on Guy’s part regarding adultery. It is my understanding that both of these matters would have been considered grievous crimes in the medieval world, with moral and legal implications. While Edwin touted his ownership of Cassia as legal husband, she was “missing” for two weeks before being found in Gisborne’s burning hunting cottage, and by Robin Hood of all people. Perhaps I read that part incorrectly, but it just seemed like suspended reality, allowing ample time for gratuitous sex.
Another fact that I found not credible was the distance between locations. Gisborne tells Cassia’s grandmother to take her far away and never come back. Her brother seems to think that this is their opportunity to move to the forest and make a new start. Conveniently, Robin Hood is still in the area, Nottingham is still within close travel distance, and miraculously, this young woman is allowed to grow up, marry, send a husband and brother off to war and still practice her healing all the while being invisible to the authorities who once branded her family traitors for their association with Robin Hood, and being accused witches to boot! To add insult to injury, the Sheriff admits that he knew all along that Cassia was once sentenced to death in that burning cottage! When Guy is injured, no one from the castle thinks to search cottage to cottage for him, Master-at-Arms, an important person in the Nottingham entourage. Again, when Gisborne whisks Cassia off to his father’s hunting cottage, he is still able to manage the commute back and forth to Nottingham for work without raising any great suspicions until coincidentally he is discovered, the cottage burned and Robin Hood and Edwin there to rescue Cassia. Points like this irritate the educated reader, and yet, for that moment in time, I bought it hook, line and sinker.
I enjoyed the story telling, the passionate characters, and the cameo appearances by Robin and Marian. I turned a blind eye to the historical inaccuracies and physical improbabilities for the sake of enjoying a good love story.