I’m always down for a pop culture ethnography, so I was naturally very excited to start this. I knew it would be outdated because pop culture changes in a millisecond, but was hoping to find some useful frameworks and analyses nonetheless. Overall, this wasn’t exactly what I wanted but I had a good time reading nonetheless.
I find transnational/cultural consumption and gender constructions both incredibly fascinating topics and so I naturally enjoyed reading more about them both here. The use of three distinct ethnographic studies in three distinct cultures was not a methodology I have encountered before, so reading about that was really engaging. I found the different studies the author embarked on very interesting and really liked how many participant quotes she included in those sections. I thought her analysis of that data was generally sound, although there were a few minor things I found less convincing. Nothing major though, just some points where I would have gone in a different direction.
However, despite enjoying the subject matter, I don't think Jung's discussion of transnational consumption and masculinity came together in a convincing way. Each chapter (roughly) has a section on (1) the intertwined history of Korea and the relevant country (2) the history of the pop culture product (3) the ways the product is consumed transnationally (4) the history of masculinity in each country (5) the masculinity portrayed in the particular pop culture product (6) the way transnational fans respond to said masculinity. Its...a lot and I don't think the author did a good job of connecting all these disparate pieces. Even the summary sections at the end felt more like repeating the material than synthesizing it, especially in the Rain and Oldboy chapters which, to me, felt the most disconnected. The Yonsama chapter, to me, felt the most cohesive of the core chapters.
I say core chapters because there is, of course, an introduction and conclusion but they are...weird. The conclusion in particular is kind of bizarre. It's ostensibly a conclusion but ultimately ends up being a 5-8 page, extremely surface-level discussion of gender in K-Pop that proposes a whole new term to describe it, before wrapping without any real discussion of how this relates to the rest of the material. It was really weird and left me with the impression that the author wrote all of these studies separately and then just...put them into one book without really considering how to connect them.
As I kind of hinted at before, the author's writing doesn't help matters. Jung is extremely repetitive, using phrases like "in this chapter I will" and "in this chapter I have shown" over and over again without a ton of synthesis. In other words, she repeats what she has just said a lot, but doesn't really synthesize what she said or explore the broader implications of it.
I still think this is an interesting read, particularly if you are really into transcultural consumption which, for the record, I think the author has the strongest grasp on. But, it definitely fell short of my expectations and left me a little frustrated by the author lol. Not the worst but, not the best.