What do you think?


Psychosomatic: Feminism and the Neurological Body
How can scientific theories contribute to contemporary accounts of embodiment in the humanities and social sciences? In particular, how does neuroscientific research facilitate new approaches to theories of mind and body? Feminists have frequently criticized the neurosciences for biological reductionism, yet, Elizabeth A. Wilson argues, neurological theories—especially certain accounts of depression, sexuality, and emotion—are useful to feminist theories of the body. Rather than pointing toward the conventionalizing tendencies of the neurosciences, Wilson emphasizes their capacity for reinvention and transformation. Focusing on the details of neuronal connections, subcortical pathways, and reflex actions, she suggests that the central and peripheral nervous systems are powerfully allied with sexuality, the affects, emotional states, cognitive appetites, and other organs and bodies in ways not fully appreciated in the feminist literature. Whether reflecting on Simon LeVay’s hypothesis about the brains of gay men, Peter Kramer’s model of depression, or Charles Darwin’s account of trembling and blushing, Wilson is able to show how the neurosciences can be used to reinvigorate feminist theories of the body.
136 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 2004
About the author
Elizabeth A. Wilson
8 books6 followersElizabeth A. Wilson is Professor of Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Emory University and the author of Psychosomatic: Feminism and the Neurological Body, also published by Duke University Press.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
October 9, 2013
Wilson's reading of theory of evolution and neuropsychology is fresh, although sometimes naive. The book's biggest forte - the lack of thinking patterns which, sadly, infect you after enough years on the scientific side of academia - is also it's biggest flaw: Wilson cannot position certain findings in the context of biological sciences and cannnot gauge their importance. Her thoughts are still interesting, though.
July 1, 2015
Could have used better organization.
January 27, 2015
An interesting attempt to bring feminist thought and biology together. Wilson's argument makes sense, to me at least. Both the hard sciences and gender studies could benefit from a mutual interaction.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews




