With a near-suffocating does of Freudian analysis, Rose drifts through authors writing about Resistance and Zionism, I think? This book was not easy to digest, as I think Rose's reliance/dependence on Freud inundates her analysis of her topics to the point of drowning them in psychoanalytic jargon and subjective concepts. Kind of like that last sentence of mine, I guess. I'm no Freudian, or Lacanian, or Jungian either, and I tend to shy away from over-psychologizing thoughts, feelings, and actions because I think it has the tendency to remove agency, or at least soften it by falling back on drives or archetypes or essences we cannot ever understand, thereby overcomplicating even the simplest of choices. As it has been said, sometimes a pipe is just a pipe. And I don't mean that in the Foucauldian sense ("This Is Not A Pipe"). Anyway. I was intrigued by Rose's introductory remarks but then she went all psychology-speak and I disengaged rather quickly. Rose also discusses several authors and their fictional works, but I was not always sure how they were tied to her topic. I found much of this book to be less than clear about how it defines and explores resistance as it relates to Jewishness, Zionism, terrorism, and the State of Israel in the present day.