Begat: The King James Bible and the English Language

by David Crystal

"Let there be light," "A fly in the ointment," "New wine in old bottles," "How are the mighty fallen," "The salt of the earth." All these everyday phrases owe their popularity to the King James Bible. Indeed, it is said that this astonishing Bible has contributed more to the color and grace of the English language than almost any other literary source.

In Begat , best-selling language expert David Crystal offers a stimulating tour of the verbal richness and incredible reach of the King James Bible. How can a work published in 1611 have had such a lasting influence on the language? To answer this question, Crystal offers fascinating discussions of phrases such as "The skin of one's teeth" or "Out of the mouth of babes," tracing how these memorable lines have found independent life in the work of poets, playwrights, novelists, politicians, and journalists, and how more recently they have been taken up with enthusiasm by advertisers, Hollywood, and hip-hop. He shows, for instance, how "Let there be light" has resurfaced as "Let there be lite," the title of a diet cookbook, and "Let there be flight," the title of an article about airport delays. Along the way, Crystal reminds us that the King James Bible owes much to earlier translations, notably those by Wycliffe in the fourteenth century and Tyndale in the sixteenth. But he also
underscores crucial revisions made by King James's team of translators, contrasting the memorable "Am I my brother's keeper" with Wycliffe's "Am I the keeper of my brother."

Language lovers and students of the Bible will be equally enthralled by Begat and its engaging look at the intersection of religion and literature.

Genres: Nonfiction, Language, History, Linguistics, Religion, Christianity, Literary Criticism

327 pages, Hardcover

First published September 23, 2010

About the author

David Crystal works from his home in Holyhead, North Wales, as a writer, editor, lecturer, and broadcaster. Born in Lisburn, Northern Ireland in 1941, he spent his early years in Holyhead. His family moved to Liverpool in 1951, and he received his secondary schooling at St Mary's College. He read English at University College London (1959-62), specialised in English language studies, did some research there at the Survey of English Usage under Randolph Quirk (1962-3), then joined academic life as a lecturer in linguistics, first at Bangor, then at Reading. He published the first of his 100 or so books in 1964, and became known chiefly for his research work in English language studies, in such fields as intonation and stylistics, and in the application of linguistics to religious, educational and clinical contexts, notably in the development of a range of linguistic profiling techniques for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. He held a chair at the University of Reading for 10 years, and is now Honorary Professor of Linguistics at the University of Wales, Bangor. These days he divides his time between work on language and work on internet applications.

source: http://www.davidcrystal.com/

Reviews

[Richard · Rating 4 out of 5]

I thought this book was quite interesting- it is more interesting than profound I should say. As I've mentioned before, it's more a book of facts than anything else. I think the way that Crystal writes is the main appeal of his linguistic work; he has an interesting topic choice and has quite a condensed but witty way of writing.

The more informal style of what could be na incredibly dry and academic book lends itself very well to a wider audience beyond those with an MA in Linguistics. Overall, I'd say it is quite a light, but very intriguing read, that is clearly well-researched beyond belief. It is almost like a casual approach to a heavy topic, which I always enjoy.

[Daniel Wright · Rating 2 out of 5]

Having been impressed and intrigued by another of David Crystal's other works, and being quite interested in the influence of the Bible on Western culture generally, this book promised to be a fascinating intersection between the two. While it still did exactly what it said on the can, the lexical influence of the Bible in general and the King James Bible in particular are surprisingly limited. Far more influential - though Professor Crystal completely fails to note this - has been the KJB's very imitable style.

Admittedly Crystal rightly pours cold water on some of the more nauseatingly hyperbolic rhetoric about its linguistic and aesthetic importance that we got during the 400th anniversary year. He still claims, though, that the KJB is the single most influentual individual text on modern English. While he's not wrong, he again fails to note that this is partly because no individual text has a great deal of importance on linguistic development, which tends to be more organic.

Despite all this, Crystal has assembled, in the way only he can, a cacophony of commonplace phrases, and there is something to for everyone learn here.

[Jillian · Rating 2 out of 5]

My frustration with this book (a gift from my late husband) is reflected In the fact that it has taken me 33 months to finish. There are lots of interesting snippets (it might prove a useful source-book for the QI quiz show) but it is hard to see where it is leading until the Epilogue.

Structures as it is, the book raises more questions than it answers and the Epilogue confirms what the reader has been forced to suspect - that the King James Version of the Bible does not, from Crystal's analysis, stand by itself in influencing particular expressions in contemporary English usage.

Crystal identifies, and examines, 257 contemporary expressions found in the King James Bible. Of these, 196 are found in at least one other earlier translation (Geneva, Bishops, Douai-Rheims, Tyndale or Wycliffe) or the expression pre-dated Bibles in English. The title, therefore, does not seem to capture the book's thesis. This resulted, for this reader at least, in considerable confusion and frustration in following 256 pages of discussion of specific phrases (organised chronologically for the Old Testament and thematically for the New) before the 5 page Epilogue broadens the thesis.

On the plus side, the book is very well indexed. There is an excellent Appendix of the 257 expressions discussed compared across six English versions of the Bible up to and including King James and a summary of the number of identified contemporary phrases used in each book of the King James Bible (why almost none in the last 16 books of the Old Testament being an unanswered question worthy of discussion). There is also an extensive index of the modern phrases discussed, of books of the Bible and Bible translations, as well as a general index. These would be of great use to language scholars who want to take this further.

For a Biblical scholar, I'd have thought that a critical question might be how to avoid modern usage of the 257 expressions getting in the way of understanding the original meaning. While it is interesting that we can find contemporary usage of the archaic past tense of 'beget', it is perhaps more significant to work out whether modern usage of terms like 'unclean' , 'holier than thou' or 'few are chosen' get in the way of our understanding of the message the biblical translators were trying to convey.

[George Shubin · Rating 2 out of 5]

I'm not sure who the target audience is. Perhaps a small group of etymologists would find some interesting information tucked away in each chapter, but I'm not sure.

The author surveys the Bible, chapter by chapter, and lists for the reader phrases that have entered into the English idiom, ofttimes apart from the public's awareness of its Biblical origins. Examples and modifications of each phrase or idea are provided, but that's about it. There is no interacting with or analysis of the Biblical text itself.

This book reminds me of a Spanish class assignment I was given in the 9th grade. My teacher wanted me to list cities and towns in California with Spanish names and provide their English meaning. So, that's pretty much what I did, and it was fairly exhaustive. I was quite happy with my work, until my teacher gave me only a C for my effort, saying he was expecting more background to the cities names and a bit of historical color to go with each name. Well, why didn't he say so to begin with?

In reading this book, I have become the teacher in my story, expecting more. But there isn't any more. What's there is not bad, and if you are not familiar with how the King James Bible has flavored the way we talk then this might be an enlightening book for you, but for me, I expected more color.

[Owen McArdle · Rating 4 out of 5]

A surprisingly systematic journey through the KJB and its influence on the English language, that toes the line well between being an easily accessible popular book and being a more rigorous linguistic study

[Fred Kohn · Rating 3 out of 5]

I became aware of this book while researching Gail Riplinger's claim that "Scholars agree that the English language did not become fixed until the King James Bible (Nuttal's Standard Dictionary [1863 edition?]) Skeptical of this claim I asked Google to supply me with the names of these scholars. It pointed me to three: writer Adam Nicolson (b. 1957) theologian Alister McGrath (b. 1953) and linguist David Crystal (b. 1941). Of these three I rejected Nicolson and McGrath as authorities because of their occupations, but because Crystal is a linguist I was intrigued. Could a linguist really think that the English language became fixed with the writing of the KJV? Not really. Another Google search yielded "Crystal maintains that languages constantly evolve and change rather than becoming permanently fixed or standardized at a single moment in history" and "In his book *Begat: The King James Bible and the English Language*, Crystal explicitly rejects descriptions like 'the DNA of the English language' as misleading exaggerations."

So it turns out my first Google answer was wrong, or at least misleading. Nonetheless this is how I was led to the book *Begat*.

The book was something of a disappointment. I was hoping for a history of how the KJV came to be the preeminent English translation. Instead, the book is little more than a list of idioms that have crept into the English language that are also found in the KJV. As a native English speaker, I knew most of these: terms like Land of Nod. Fire and brimstone, Milk and honey, and Fleshpots; although it wasn’t until a few years ago that I realized that in its original context, Fleshpots had nothing to do with sensual comfort.

Crystal gives some interesting contemporary examples of biblical idioms being used in ways of which I was unaware such as a burning bush referring to George W. Bush becoming angry. Nor had I heard the phrase "There is no rest for the wicked." I had always heard it as "no rest for the weary." Both phrases are variations on "There is no peace,” says my God, “for the wicked”, from Isaiah 48.22; 57.21. It’s an interesting example of how phrases can become varied. OED's first reference to "no rest for the wicked" is from 1935 but according to Crystal the phrase appeared 2 years earlier in the U.S.

These variant phrases, by the way, are a likely explanation for the Mandela effect in a biblical context. There is a group of people who think that Satan is changing the wording in physical Bibles because they remember the phrases differently. A popular example is "the lion will lie down with the lamb" instead of the actual "the wolf shall dwell with the lamb." (Crystal does not cover this idiom, but he does not claim his list is exhaustive.) Crystal has no comments about the Mandela effect community. He is likely not aware of this nutty group of people.

There were some great examples of how biblical idioms were used over the centuries. For example in tracing the references to 2 Samuel 1.20 "Tell it not in Gath, publish it not in the streets of Askelon", Crystal notes a 1772 example; "Publish it not in the streets of Boston!" an 1814 example; Tell it not in Ruthwell—publish it not in the streets of Kir[k]cudbright", a 1930 example; "Tell it not in Bath, publish it not in the streets of Cheltenham", and finally a 2009 example; "Tell it not in Tatton, and publish it not in the streets of Whitney".

Other idioms that were referenced historically included "holier than thou", first used as an adjective in 1912; "wheels within wheels", 1709; "feet of clay", 1814; shout something from the rooftops, 1870; "go the second mile", 1854

The use of Philistines in a bad sense as early as 1600 caught my attention because my music background made me aware of Robert Schumann's use of that term. For Schumann, the Philistines were composers and listeners who liked shallow, flashy, or pedestrian music. I always wondered if Schumann was the first to use that term. Guess not. According to Google, Schumann was the first to prominently use the term "Philistine" with application to musicians and listeners. This would have been a great avenue to explore, but Crystal does not. Perhaps he is unaware of the connection.

Some of the examples of idiomatic uses were humorous, like the newspaper headline, "Top Seeds Fall by the Wayside" (an article about a tennis tournament), or "Judge not, lest ye be smacked in the mouth," or "A fresh coat of paint covers a multitude of sins" (in house selling).

Some of these examples were instructive. I always wondered about whether Paul's phrasing about heaping coals of fire on the head (12.20) was a positive thing or a negative thing Crystal gives 4 examples of this usage from the 19th century, all of which were positive.

Another phrase that I had not heard used idiomatically was "Jesus wept". "Exclamations and oaths using the name of Jesus are recorded from the fourteenth century, but 'Jesus wept' isn’t recorded until the twentieth century as a modern expletive, heard especially in the UK, Ireland, and Australia as a strong exclamation of surprise, disbelief, or dismay." It makes sense if you think about it, and I may have to incorporate this into my vocabulary.

Since Crystal is a linguist and not a biblical scholar he drops the ball in a couple of places. He suggests that Wycliffe probably got the phrase "wolves in sheep's clothing" from Aesop. In fact, "wolves in sheep's clothing" is a direct translation from the Greek. According to Google "The narrative of the wolf dressing in a sheepskin to deceive a flock—falsely or later credited to Aesop—does not appear in written literature until much later, with early versions emerging around the 12th century CE (such as in the writings of Nikephoros Basilakis)."

Crystal also bobbles "new wine in old bottles." He claims "It was suggested that when the translations first appeared ordinary people didn’t understand what was going on," and perhaps if the translators had used "wineskins" instead of "bottles", it would have been clearer. But in fact in the 17th century the term "bottles" referred to a flexible container such as a wineskin, not the hard containers we think of in the 21st century.

I read somewhere years ago that if you are familiar with the biblical books of Genesis and Matthew, you are going to recognize most biblical references in modern culture. This seems to be roughly correct. Crystal analyzes the 276 phrases he cites and finds that over half of the New Testament examples (99) are from the four gospels with Matthew being preeminent and over half the Old Testament references (51) are from three books: Exodus, Genesis, and Ecclesiastes.

I doubt I’ll read this book again but I’m glad to have it in my library since there is an index in the back of idioms one can refer to in order to find Crystal’s discussions of these phrases in the text of the book; a handy tool indeed!

[Sarah · Rating 4 out of 5]

A much lighter, quicker read than I'd expected. The approach is formulaic: here is a snippet from the Bible, here's how it has evolved, here's how we extend it. But that isn't really a problem for me - I was just fascinated by how many idioms were biblical in origin without me being aware of it!

[Christopher Rush · Rating 2 out of 5]

So basically ... this is a chronicle of one weekend David Crystal spent online looking up references to Biblical phrases on the British Intrenet. Mr. Crystal pretends at the beginning it will be a survey of how the phrases of the KJV have influenced the language and thought patterns and (we naturally infer) life choices of the English-speaking members of the human race. Mr. Crystal cannot keep up the imposture long, however, and he knows it - almost immediately after stating his purported intent, Mr. Crystal demurs by intimating how difficult a task that is and will only be mentioned sporadically. Before the introduction is over, the attentive reader wonders why all the fuss, then. And Mr. Crystal proceeds to answer that question not at all.

The bulk of this thing (I can't really call it a "book") is effectively a summary of Web search results Mr. Crystal found. I kid you not. Mr. Crystal takes what he suspects are famous and influential phrases and notions and vocabulary from the KJV, compares them to previous English translations of the Old Testament and New, then tells us what similar phrasings he found online. And as we all know, immediate Web search results are the definitive guide to understanding influence, especially in the field of language.

For no scrutable reason, Mr. Crystal wants us to believe "using expressions incorrectly, inaccurately, incompletely, or just plain differently signifies influence." Perhaps on some planet in our or another solar system, hundreds of thousands of people using an expression completely unlike how it was originally meant without even knowing its source can be accurately adjudged as "influence." However, and especially for the The Old Sword, this is not the case on this planet, the planet upon which this review is being written.

It's bad enough Mr. Crystal measures "influence" by Web results (he addresses the issue and its difficulty substantially only for something like two full paragraphs throughout the entire work, thoroughly disappointing), he then proves he has rarely any grasp of what these misuses of Biblical phrases (certainly a tenuous grasp of them in their Biblical contexts at best as well). For instance, while it is nice, I suppose, references to Star Trek outnumber references to Playboy Magazine at the ration of 5:1, Mr. Crystal proves he has no understanding of the Star Trek reference to Babel, because he either a) conflates the Star Trek (Original Series) second season episode "Journey to Babel" with the Deep Space Nine first season episode "Babel," or b) he just assumes because he has no idea the Starship Enterprise is in the DS9 episode "Babel." And it's those kinds of inaccuracies that give us no confidence in why Web articles using Biblical phrases incorrectly somehow proves the KJV has been influential in some sort of meaningful way.

The last sixty-some pages of the non-book is just charts of whether the Geneva Bible, Tyndale, and the others use the same phrases as the KJV, which could be interesting in some other work, but Mr. Crystal makes it totally boring. And perhaps that was his whole point. He concludes by trying to tell us the KJV hasn't been all that influential after all, since some of the phrases that have become common idiom are combinations of Tyndale, the KJV, and others, and sometimes not even the KJV. Maybe this is all part of some insidious plot by David Crystal and others to make the Bible look like some old fashioned pile of nonsense. If so, this thing is itself such a useless pile of nonsense it might almost succeed, if it weren't for the fact, well, the Bible is the Bible, after all, and no amount of piffle from Crystal, Feuerbach, Nietzsche, Darwin, Gervais, or any of the gang will undermine that no matter how hard they try (or just write up a weekend's worth of Web browsing with no actual intellectual effort, as is the case here).

Oh, and, inexplicably, Mr. Crystal throughout calls soccer "football," an embarrassing error one would think the formerly reputable publishers at Oxford University Press would catch.

[Phoenix · Rating 2 out of 5]

Begone the Begat

One good phrase deserves another. The book is an expository catalog of common English idioms who's origins come from the King James Bible published in 1611.

The best that can be said of this quadracentennial tribute is that it's thorough. I enjoyed it for the first 40 pages or so, and was pleased with my own recognition rate of both original phrasing and Crystal's found variations thanks to having a high school teacher who lured us on Northrop Frye and a misspent youth reading mysteries and science fiction. The problem is that the methodology is boring and repetitive, even if sipped in small doses. Crystal checks a familiar phrase in the Oxford Concise to make sure that it's not older than the KJV, throws partial phrases into google to come up applications and hopefully funny variations and repeats. In some cases all that remains is the rhythm of the phrase and the pattern of alliteration with a biblical origin that could be entirely speculative.

I really wanted to like it more than I did. There's an index of phrases used at the back. It has some value if one is a cleric, and the origin and variation motif could easily be applied to the weekly sermon as long as one doesn't overdo it. It's OK as a reference book for the church library, but it just wasn't that memorable so I'm giving my copy a toss.

[Tom · Rating 4 out of 5]

Entertaining and learned survey of the linguistic influence of the King James Bible, published in 2011 to mark its 500th anniversary. It's already showing its age a little via phrases that are passing into recent history: "netizen", "Obama and Osama"; but recent enough to document the reawakening and spread of biblical language, when used in an election speech for example, via social media.

Sequential chapters for the Old Testament are complemented by thematic studies of the often-duplicated gospel and epistolary New Testament material.

Crystal generally follows a formula of a biblical quotation followed by some metaphorical and linguistic discussion, then the fruits of some googling of contemporary usage (across a striking breadth of sources: from the White House to the West of England Cocker Spaniel Club and everything in between).

Chapters are brief, more or less bite-sized, or at least mouthful-sized, and the author is fond of the creativity of headline-writers, so most of them finish with a good groan. This gives Begat a lightweight, slightly frivolous tone, but it also carries a sense of authority and a comprehensive index and appendix (specifying the translation or version that provided each phrase). These make it an excellent book for quick reference.

[Donald · Rating 2 out of 5]

If you expect this to be a book about the English language when the KJV was written, or about the influence of the KJV on the history of language, you will be disappointed. Instead, it's a lexicon of biblical phrases that Crystal reckons have become common idioms, which he principally judges according to their ability to be manipulated in punning headlines. There is no overall thesis here. It is book designed only to be dipped into. The author is a prodigious writer of books on language, but this feels like something he threw together between other, more substantial projects.

[Catface · Rating 4 out of 5]

As ever with David Crystal, this book is well researched, fairly light in tone and relevant to contemporary sources as well as historical ones. Unfortunately, I tried to sit down and read it front to back and it's really not that type of book. This is far more of a word-a-day type thing where you read a few pages at a time and enjoy the tidbits of info that you come across. Eventually I had to return it, so didn't finish but this wasn't Mr Crystal's fault at all.

[Alex · Rating 2 out of 5]

The book is this: a questions in the introduction followed by a list of phrases (257 it turns out) and then the author’s view of the answer to this question. The body of the book is incredibly dull, with it being almost entirely instances of 1) phrase 2) people using the phrase discovered by searching it online 3) maybe some commentary on why it is popular. Really anyone could have written this, especially in today’s age.

[Kristy W · Rating 3 out of 5]

I really liked the parts about the variations in translation among the different Bibles, but there was a lot of on and on with every example of the Bible language being used in modern media.

[Amanda Witt · Rating 4 out of 5]

A great break down of the various phrases that have come through to the modern English and by comparing five different Bible publishers, the wording is also slightly different.

[Jerry · Rating 3 out of 5]

We think in Bible. I knew many of the words and phrases from the KJV but their reach is incredible.

[Cat. · Rating 4 out of 5]

This is a bit old by now, released in the years around the 500th anniversary of the KJV. There were some very Brit-centric takes, but generally really amusing and intteresting.

[Emily Geddes · Rating 2 out of 5]

Two hundred fifty-seven. That's how many idioms Mr. Crystal has identified as coming into common use in the English language expressly because of the King James Version of the Bible. The “skin of one's teeth,” “fire and brimstone,” “there's nothing new under the sun,” even “be very afraid” all have their roots in the KJV, arguably the most influential book ever published.

In coming up with the number two hundred fifty-seven, Mr. Crystal makes a distinction between idioms, which have general everyday usage and can apply to various situations, and quotations, which he defines as “expressions which are used only in settings where the religious application is relevant, maintaining their original biblical sense.” So, let's look at Psalms, for example. “The Lord is my shepherd” (Psalms 23:1) is an extremely well-known phrase found in the King James Version of the Holy Bible, but it is rarely, if ever, used out of the original context and therefore counts as a quotation, not included in the two hundred fifty-seven idioms mentioned above. However, “out of the mouth of babes” (Psalms 8:2) is spoken frequently when a child says something humorous, insightful or prescient.

Idioms in the Old Testament are dealt with in the order in which they appear, starting with Genesis (“let there be light”) and going through Malachi (“root nor branch”). After a brief interlude discussing some of the differences between the Old and New Testaments, Mr. Crystal picks up with a thematic approach to the New Testament, grouping similar topics of idioms together. With the aid of Google (and, I'm sure, other research methods), Mr. Crystal collects several examples of uses to which these idioms have been put, some incredibly clever and some groan-worthy. In the chapter “A Coat of Many Colours” he mentions the Broadway musical “Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dream Coat;” the country song by Dolly Parton; a blog for bi-color, tri-color and solid-coated cats; and headlines on articles in biochemistry, publishing, fashion, politics and sociology, just to name a few.

Among the fascinating tidbits throughout the book are the additional translations that Mr. Crystal notes. He refers frequently to at least five other versions of the Bible: Wycliffe's, Tyndale's, the Geneva Bible, the Bishops' Bible, and the Douai-Rheims translation. He even includes an appendix comparing the translations of the 257 idioms across the six versions. It's sometimes difficult, Mr. Crystal points out, to pin the credit for making a particular phrase a common idiom on the KJV. Some of the phrases (like “my brother's keeper”) were in multiple translations, some (such as “sour grapes”) were already in common usage before the KJV was published and some (“no rest for the wicked,” for example) take a different form that what is actually found in any translation of the Bible.

Begat may be a bit heavy on linguistics and historical and grammatical minutiae for those not intrigued by the topic, but even so, it's a great reference to read a chapter or two at a time for curiosity's sake.

(On a related note, there's a delightful video at http://kingsenglish.info/ which takes you through 100 idiomatic phrases from the King James Bible – all mentioned in Begat – in three minutes!)

For more book reviews, come visit my blog, Build Enough Bookshelves.

[Jennifer (JC-S) · Rating 4 out of 5]

The King James Bible and the English Language

It’s been 400 years since the King James Bible was published in 1611, and it is often referred to as a source of great influence on the English language. Consider these commonly used phrases: ‘A fly in the ointment’, ’How are the mighty fallen’, ‘Let there be light’, ‘New wine in old bottles ‘, ‘The salt of the earth’, and ‘The skin of one’s teeth’. Each of these phrases owes its popularity to the King James Bible.

But is it true that no book has had a greater influence on the English language? To answer this question, David Crystal, a professor of linguistics, has sifted through the King James Bible and compared it to six earlier translations. While acknowledging that the King James Bible owes much to those earlier translations – especially those by Wycliffe (14th century) and Tyndale (16th century) there are also some key revisions. Consider the impact of ‘Am I my brother’s keeper?’ with Wycliffe’s ‘Am I the keeper of my brother?’

English has changed in the past 400 years and while (most of us at least) no longer use the exact same language of the King James Bible, David Crystal has looked at idiom rather than quotation to demonstrate its influence. David Crystal has counted 257 phrases or words that are now idiomatic, and they are each listed and discussed in the book. While only 18 of these idioms take the exact form shown in the King James Bible, 7 exact forms come from other translations.

Interestingly, in 37 cases the King James antecedent has been rewritten while in the other 196 cases, the form of words in the King James Bible is paralleled in an earlier translation: the majority (160) in the Geneva Bible of 1560. There’s a marvellous 38 page table setting out the occurrence of David Crystal’s 257 identified idioms in the different versions of the bible chosen.

So, what is the difference between Bible quotation and idiom? Bible quotations are characterised by being used only in settings where their religious application is relevant, and they maintain their original sense, for example: ‘Behold a virgin shall be with child and shall bring forth a son.’ A biblical idiom that has entered the language will, in contrast, also be used by non-believers, will often have a change of meaning and will frequently (and sometimes humorously) be adapted, for example: ‘Let there be lite’.

David Crystal acknowledges that his classification is to some extent subjective and that other people may arrive at a slightly different number. So, what does this mean? Well, those that claim that there are thousands of examples are wrong. While 257 may not seem a particularly large number, a similar method applied to the writings of Shakespeare arrives at a total of about 100.

Fascinating stuff for those of us interested in the English language.

Jennifer Cameron-Smith

[Seth Heasley · Rating 4 out of 5]

The fact that it took me twelve weeks to finish David Crystal's ambitious Begat: The King James Bible & the English Language should not be taken as a criticism of the book. In fact, I see it as a result of two things: 1.) my other reading and 2.) short chapters.

With the Herculean goal of determining the impact of the King James Bible not on Western Culture or Western Law or anything like that, but on the English Language itself, Crystal in Begat takes a meandering stroll through the more and less productive parts of the KJV and analyzes the impact notable phrases have had on English. In doing so, he also mentions whether the same wording occurred in earlier or contemporary English translations, and what kind of use the phrase is put to in the here and now.

As I mentioned, the chapters are nice and short, and each chapter is broken up into sections for each phrase under consideration. So it makes for good nightstand reading, and that's the chief reason I kept not finishing this book. But it's a fascinating tour of one of the most read books in history.

David Crystal is one of the foremost authorities on the English language, and I'd been meaning to read one of his books for quite some time. His writing is excellent, and I appreciated the examples he picked out to use when considering the lengths to which phrases could be adapted. One of my favorite examples was an adaptation of "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife" into "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's WiFi." Heh.

Full review on my blog.

[Mike · Rating 3 out of 5]

On the fence about awarding this a "2" it's definitely more of a 2.5 than a full 3.

Like many books on narrow/obscure topics, one gets a bit weary from the repetition.
However, I picked up this book because I was interested in the topic of how our common language was influenced by this well-known (and fairly early, but not THE earliest) translation into the vernacular.

I don't know the author from a hole in the wall and I did not do any research on him, but I feel like he did a very credible job of looking for and choosing which tidbits came to us via this bible versus others (or none). Somethings were obvious and others were very pleasant surprises.

If you are interested in how we have seeded the language with aphorisms, quotations, and things which become the bedrock of our shared knowledge this is a pretty good book.

Check it out for yourself.

[JackieB · Rating 4 out of 5]

Very interesting. It examined how the King James bible has affected the English language, in an accessible, but fairly in-depth way. The author explained why some phrases are memorable and others are not. He also looked at how the meanings might have changed over the years, and how we "play" with phrases for comic and other effects. I learnt a lot about English. This review makes it sound a really boring book, but it wasn't, partly because of the author's sense of humour but also because the phrases he discussed are used so often probably every English speaker has heard them, if not used them themselves.

[Blair Hodges · Rating 1 out of 5]

This seemed like an interesting subject, but the execution was boring. Each chapter tackles one or several biblical phrases by tracing its use amongst English speakers. I was surprised by continuous reference to Google search results as a source for phrase usage. There is really no analysis about the interaction between language and culture, it is merely a litany of examples of phrases which people apparently still use, the origins of which being traceable to the King Jams version of the Bible. This book might have worked better as a long-running daily blog post or something.

[Douglas Hayes · Rating 2 out of 5]

It's hard to know who this book would appeal to. It is a tracing of words and phrases found in the Bible into wider cultural use. Chapter by chapter David Crystal works his way through the Bible and identifies how biblical language has been taken up by society - usually without recognizing their biblical foundations. It's more of a book for those who are curious about such things than any kind of meaningful interaction with either the Bible or culture.

[Kate · Rating 2 out of 5]

I got the impression that the author had queried the publisher, had his idea accepted, and then discovered he didn't have enough material. I'd say at least 30% of the book is discussing phrases that did NOT make it into the English language. And that's all the book discusses--I'd hoped to see material on how the King James Bible affected style. I still found it interesting, but not as interesting as I'd hoped.

[Phil Mc · Rating 3 out of 5]

A coffee table book which, whilst interesting, falls into the 'linguistic tourism' category and in spite of the meticulous and systematic effort of one of the great modern writers in linguistics, it ends up being a little dull. Greater focus on the grammar amongst other more meaty linguistic areas would have made this more interesting but perhaps less accessible to the masses.

Crystal's work is impressive but, on this occasion, not effective in capturing my attention and imagination.

[Leasha · Rating 2 out of 5]

I do not understand what this book is supposed to be.
Is it a book you reference?
Is it a book you read?
Really, it's neither. It has paragraphs that are unlike those in a reference book, but most of them are list-y paragraphs that are not at all readable. The organization is not explicit enough for it to be easily referenced, although the indices are friendly toward such endeavors.
A few gems are tucked away, but overall, it was not worth the work to get to them.

[April · Rating 3 out of 5]

Cute, light look at various phrases from different early versions of the Bible and how they have come to be used in present day. Crystal mostly organizes his book by Bible books, and examined Wycliffe's, Tyndale's, and the original King James' versions of the bible along with Google searches of phrasings to see how such phrases are used now. Good reference book.

[Kathy · Rating 3 out of 5]

Informative in a casual way. Lots of little tidbits of information, but nothing practical. So I could completely relax while reading, it didn't demand anything of me except for a passing familiarity with the Bible, which I have.

[Susan Hatch · Rating 3 out of 5]

This was a fun book to read aloud as we drove. This is the first of 2 books I got from the library in honor the 400th anniversary of the King James version of the Bible. This book takes phrases from the KJV and tells how those phrases apply to modern life, other literature moments, etc.