An under appreciated gem?
Hell no.
But I did finish this one, cover to cover, so there’s that. I guess that makes it the most readable of the bad EDAs, or to put it another way, the worst Doctor Who novel I've ever finished reading. Although I must confess I did not enjoy the classic Telos novelisation Doctor Who and The Daleks, but managed the entirety of that.
I guess it’s the common element; the early Dalek stories, especially those first two, have a raw mythic power and this book, for all it’s many flaws, taps directly into the post war hauntingness and compelling retro-futurism of The Daleks’s invasion of Earth.
Trouble is it doesn't proceed to do anything of any value with that. The blend of feudal features and modern touches is interesting in it’s own way. The divided, warring Britain littered with Dalek relics and the odd monster in the woods is a cool idea. The social drift back towards overt sexism is plausible, and has plenty of potential for social/historical commentary. But nothing is made of these ideas, their presentation is extremely flat, and there is no originality or inspiration to them, no clever nuances or subtle details.
The plot occupies it’s self excessively with the bland and distasteful local power feuds, in which The Master is tediously involved, it’s petty, boring, and hard to keep track of. none of the characters involved have anything resembling a likable quality, and the story’s fawning over their nastiness leaves an unpleasant taste in the mouth.
As does every attempt made to deal with serious social or moral matters, the horrors of war, the fear of confronting one’s nightmares, the pain of life after an abusive relationship. These huge issues are trotted out as if to titillate a sadistic audience while lip service is payed, shame faced, to how awful it all is. Principles which come to a spluttering halt in the character of Barlow, initially one of the tedious courtesans in the politicking, he rises to prominence as a cold hearted general who seizes absolute power in one foul swoop. However, considering the framing of the story, I am given to believe that he is supposed to be a likable character of some sort?
Who knows.
As for the Daleks, and The Master, total non event. They are present in the narrative, they tick off all the standard tropes required by rote for the characters, but again the depiction is flat and unimaginative, The Master’s inner thoughts are as clumsily handled as The Doctor was back in The Bodysnatchers, and neither antagonist has any real point. The Master releases some Daleks, who talk big and shoot about 5 people, then they get blown up and the book is over.
I could go on picking this one apart, the pacing, the use of Susan and David, the gut-wrenching tediousness of the shoehorned setup to The Deadly Assassin…
But I don’t want to dwell on all this when there is a Paul Leonard story waiting for me on the next tab, let’s round things off:
Doctor and Donna watch (diddle diddle deee):
Another unobjectionable rendition of Eight, surprisingly, nothing that good but certainly less clumsily handled than the other characters present. As for his stand-in companion, well, my feelings are mixed. Donna (not that Donna) is a strong, likable, very human character, but is by far her best at the start of the book, the handling of her backstory and resolution are both deeply awkward and uncomfortable.
So why did I read it at all? Well I guess it had a childish simplicity, and a sense of being made out of big colourful blocks. It’s a lego Doctor Who story, which had an appeal after the blandness of Longest Day, which I guess is something. Also it’s definitely a quick read, I tore through it in practically two sittings (bisected by a period in which I read a couple of other, much better, books at a far slower pace), probably aided by the total vacancy of plot.
This is the best I can say for it.