The NEW INTERNATIONAL BIBLICAL COMMENTARY offers the best of contempory scholarsip in a format that both general readers and serious students can use with profit. Based on the widely used New International Version translation, the NIBC presents careful section-by-section exposition with the key terms and phrases high-lighted and all Greek transliterated. A separate section of notes at the close of each chapter provides additional textual and technical comments. Each commentary also includes a selected bibliography as well as Scripture and subject indexes.
Gordon Fee was Professor Emeritus of New Testament at Regent College, where he taught for sixteen years. His teaching experience also included serving schools in Washington, California, Kentucky, as well as Wheaton College in Illinois (five years) and Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary in Massachusetts (twelve years).
Gordon Fee was a noted New Testament scholar, having published several books and articles in his field of specialization, New Testament textual criticism. He also published a textbook on New Testament interpretation, co-authored two books for lay people on biblical interpretation, as well as scholarly-popular commentaries on 1 and 2 Timothy and Titus and on Galatians, and major commentaries on 1 Corinthians and Philippians. He is also the author of a major work on the Holy Spirit and the Person of Christ in the letters of Paul.
Gordon Fee served as the general editor of the New International Commentary series, as well as on the NIV revision committee that produced the TNIV. Besides his ability as a biblical scholar, he was a noted teacher and conference speaker. He has given the Staley Distinguished Christian Scholar lectures on fifteen college campuses as well as the annual NT lectures at Southwestern Baptist Seminary, North Park Seminary, the Mennonite Brethren Biblical Seminary, the Canadian Theological Seminary, Duke Divinity School, Golden Gate Baptist, Anderson School of Theology, Asbury Seminary, and Chrichton College. An ordained minister with the Assemblies of God, Gordon Fee was well known for his manifest concern for the renewal of the church.
Gordon Fee was married and had four married children.
This is a good commentary covering the Pastoral Epistles (1 Timothy, Titus and 2 Timothy, in that order) - examining each verse (or group of verses), within each pericope.
The Author makes a good defence for Pauline Authorship, though does helpfully include some of the Pseudepigraphical arguments along the way in the Additional Notes. He also argues that the purpose of these letters has more to do with the problem of False Teachers / Teachings then them containing some sort of early Church Manual - and I think he demonstrates this quite well.
Though not a brief commentary, I did feel that more comment could be made about various themes as they were encountered would have been advantageous.
Fee is undoubtedly a skilled scholar, but I felt many times while reading this that he avoided some of the major evidence in favor of all views regarding elders and deacons, and especially regarding the role of women. I read this while also reading Mounce's volume on the Pastorals in the Word series, and it's evident that Fee either did not do enough research, or omitted significant information. I tend to think the former is true. Either way, though, I enjoyed the book. Fee gave great insight into some difficult passages, and even at times that I didn't agree with him he made me think deeply about the text.
I thought this was a good commentary. As a general reader, it's extremely hard for me to find commentaries that aren't ridiculously wordy or that sound like the author is trying to let everybody know how smart they are while at the same time also conveying some extra nuggets that I didn't already know. This one did a good job of balancing both. I wish there was more application on a lot of commentaries, and this one fell into that as well. I enjoyed the context part and the explanations of the ancient world, but there was zero application to today.
Fee's commentary on the pastoral epistles was a wonderful resource to have in my study of the pastoral epistles. It had some great insights into the meaning of some passages that used to perplex me. Would not hesitate to recommend to someone looking for an accessible commentary on these letters!
Fee unjustifiably argues that the false teaching in Ephesus was female dominant. Hence the prohibitions are merely situational against the female false teachers there. But it’s a house of cards argument.
Enjoyed reading this commentary on the pastoral letters. There was no application of the text to life in general, but he was very thorough in dealing with the structure of the text and questions of interpretation.
Leí este libro para seguir con la costumbre que empecé en la cuarentena de estudiar una carta bíblica al mes. En este comentario están incluidas tres: 1ª y 2ª de Timoteo y Tito. Es un libro completo, repleto de información y muy útil para profundizar en estos escritos paulinos a veces un poco difíciles de entender. La verdad es que el último mes me costó más seguir y el final del libro lo pasé por arriba, pero la estructura de todo el material es el mismo así que puedo decir que es un trabajo valioso de este autor cristiano.
Don't always agree with his conclusions at points and, considering his teaching on exegesis is quite good, he doesn't practice what he preaches at times, especially concerning the issue of the role of women in the household and in church ministry. However, if one can see past this, the majority of his commentary (and others on Paul's letters) is fairly good.
Excellent defense of Pauline authorship in the introduction; disagreed with his position on women and ministry and did not find the exegesis compelling; found the commentary on 1 Timothy (which was the section I read) to do a good job of explaining how the letter fits together, how the parts relate to the whole.
Fees chief contribution in this book is that he views it as a specific letter written to Timothy for specific problems at the church on Ephesus. He doesn't see it as a general guideline for church management and growth. It is very helpful very insightful and very much worth having on your shelf.
Decent commentary. I appreciated the technical but not too technical aspects. He states the different viewpoints in exegesis well, then lands. I cannot say I agreed with every point. But a solid commentary none the less.