Casts an amusing new light on the convoluted history of the first writing machines, re-examines important and unusual typewritten texts -- including the manuscript of On the Road and William S. Burroughs s cut-ups -- and recounts the exploits of a typewriting cockroach named Archy. Discusses typewriter-related rumors and anecdotes (the dying Henry James had become so accustomed to dictating his novels to a typist that he required the sound of a randomly operated typewriter to begin to compose). Reveals not only the history of and anecdotes about the machine, but also the fascinating way that, over the last two centuries when typewriting was writing, the tool actually shaped the creative process and regulated its users behavior and thought processes.
Sometimes I pick up a book on a random topic, thinking "huh, let's see how someone can make an interesting read out of this seemingly mundane topic." Turns out that with the history of typewriting, that isn't possible. At least, it's not possible for this author. I only read about 70 pages, but even those were painful. The cultural analysis felt forced, the history was muddled, and the prose was a slog. I wish it could have been better, but, alas.
I will admit that I only read the first two chapters of this book, and if anyone was able to make it all the way through and thought it to be a worthy tome, I would love to hear your comments.
My own opinion was that it reads like a school research paper, with large portions of paraphrasing or quotes from other books. The author also makes it clear from the get-go that this will NOT be a traditional history of the typewriter (and recommends another book if that is what you are looking for- I may have to check it out), but an archaeological dig, if you will. Because of this and the convoluted turns of phrase that seem to define Wershler-Henry’s writing (“… I’m interested in typewriting as a discourse: one of the systems of ideas and rules that structure our lives in ways that are subtle and brutal by turns.” [pg. 14]), I found that I was unable to read this book and therefore would not recommend it.
i bought this to remind myself to write a story about typewriting monkeys. i think everyone should write a story about typewriting monkeys. if they do so, i would be thrilled to edit the anthology. this all started, i should say, because i read a review of this in the times literary supplement and it mentioned that there is a whole chapter on what Emile Borel, the French mathematician, referred to as the "dactylographic monkey." the chapter in question begins, quite wonderfully, with the sentence: "Sooner or later, anyone writing about typewriting has to deal with the monkeys."
I'm jumping around this book; it's a collection of different items, like the title suggests; I started reading the section about William S. Burroughs. Most of the interesting material is more about our relationships to typewriters rather than a dull history of the industry. Not that I wouldn't mind reading more about the history of the industry, but....
My friend Carla in Portland sent me a copy last year, and I've been reading parts of it now & then, keeping it on my desk with my typewriter parts & tools.