I went and bought Neandertals: Changing the Image of Mankind by Erik Trinkaus and Pat Shipman as it was the only book on the subject at all at the local half price books. Unfortunately the book was primarily concerned with human evolution and not so much with Neanderthals themselves. But for all that it was an interesting look at how the theories have grown over time. The two authors started very early with the early 1800's and the history of the theories of evolution. For each new scientist introduced they went into detail about their background, education, and what ideas they held, and what they discovered. It was interesting to see where and when the bones were found and the different impact on theories about Neandertals were formed because of them. However the largest focus of the book seemed to be simply, whether or not Neandertals were to be included as part of human ancestry or not, and the arguments back and forth over the past 180 odd years.
Which was a little odd as the author Trinkaus was famous for wanting to look at Neandertals in their own right and try and figure out who they were, rather than whether or not they were our own ancestors. As the work got closer to the present their were a few attempts to put in some practical knowledge about them. There was discussion of the graves, their care for the elderly and infirm, and a little about their technology. But it was a book written much more about the history of a science and how it reflects the age the science is being done in, rather than about the creatures that were supposedly being studied. (Now I'm feeling self conscious for using the word creatures instead of humans).
I learned a lot from this book however, about the wide dispersal of neandertal bones, for instance, some of the best finds were found in Iraq and are now thought lost after the 1991 bombings. I learned about the piltdown hoax, the history of science and in particular archeology and anthropology in the past few centuries. And how the ideas of human evolution have grown and changed over time.
One interesting bit was reading about the "eve" hypothesis. I remember when this was first explained and my mother who had no belief in evolution, went, "ah ha science is proving the bible right" and therefore she could listen to the science, never mind the huge difference in time scales, and the fact that it was based on evolutionary changes. She wanted to see what fit with her world view. Which is really what the book was all about, how are studying of the past, and the people of the past, is really a reflection of ourselves and how we look at the world. The last chapter had an analysis of the different images of Neandertals in time. It started with a Victorian image, that had the woman neandertal lying with her head on the bed turned away from the cave entrance, (in a state of grief or helplessness) while the male stood vigilantly with his eyes wide and a tool in hand standing by the entrance and looking out. They used a 1950's B movie poster to illustrate the fear of science that everyone was feeling after the devastation of WWII.
It was an interesting book, not what I was looking for, but a good start. So far I have only been able to find two other books on Neandertals to read. One is a lovely 1916 copy of a book about early man, with lots of lovely illustrations and pictures, though hopelessly out of date, I now at least know how far their ideas had gotten and why they were thinking those things at the time. The next I have I have high hopes for, published in 2002 called The Neandertals' Necklace I'm hoping it will include more details about who they were and what they did. Rather than if they are or aren't part of our ancestral heritage.
(And while the H was dropped out of Neanderthal in the 1970's to make it match the actual German that the words were taken from, Neander Tal, my spell checker still thinks that it should be spelt with the H put back in. Oh well, I'm sticking with what the book said.)