3 - 3.5 stars...I think.
Parts of this I loved, but whilst reading I kept changing my mind about how to rate it. To be honest I'm still a little unsure. Let me try and explain.
The romance was beautifully done, as always. Ben and Chloe were really likeable and their relationship development was sweet and romantic. With Catherine Anderson I expect the love to come before the physical, and truly, she is a master at this. With other authors you can sometimes feel that they have thrown in a bit of conflict, just for the sake of building the sexual tension which, in my opinion, is a waste of words if you can't keep it interesting. What's the point? But with Catherine Anderson it all happens very naturally. I'm enjoying the development and the dialogue so much, that I just fly through the pages and I forget that we haven't even got to the sex yet. This would usually frustrate me, as I say, but Catherine Anderson writes so compellingly, that she tricks me into forgetting!
I loved Jeremy, loved Nan, loved all the animals. Where can I get a wolf?
My reservations about this story probably come down to personal preference.
Firstly, I'm not keen on having God shoved down my throat. I don't object to religion in any way, in fact I used to be a big fan of it. I just don't want to feel like the author is preaching at me from behind her computer. This time it was a little too much.
Secondly, Chloe had some real too-stupid-to-live moments. Why on earth did she go out for dinner with Bobby Lee? I wouldn't have and I am not weary of men in the way that she was.
Lastly, would the Sheriff really be so callous when it comes to the safety of a single woman and child? Perhaps I myself am being naive here, thinking that law men do things by the book regardless of who the perpetrator might be. The UK is very different to the USA, in terms of police, and so maybe I fail to understand the cultural differences between the two, especially if you are talking big city versus small town. Small town is somewhat out of my range of experience. Certainly in the UK, with lots of governing bodies who you can complain to, it would be much harder to get away with that sort of failure to do your duty. I understand the difficulties of making accusations against someone who is trusted by the town, however, to ignore the accusation completely seemed a little bit too unbelievable. The Sheriff seemed like a good man, but that's not something I think a good man would do.