Organizations are a part of everyday life, whether in schools, hospitals, police stations or commercial companies. In this classics text, Charles Handy argues that the key to successful organizations lies in a better understanding of the needs and motivations of the people within them.
Understanding Organizations offers an extended 'dictionary' of the key concepts -- culture, motivations, leadership, role-playing, co-ordinating and consultation -- and then shows how this 'language' can help us find new solutions to familiar problems. Few management writers have been as consistently challenging and influential as Charles Handy. Firmly established as one of the core business texts, this book is essential reading for anyone interested in organizations and how to make them work better.
Charles Brian Handy was an Irish author and philosopher who specialised in organizational behavior and management. Among the ideas he advanced are the "portfolio career" and the "shamrock organization" (in which professional core workers, freelance workers and part-time/temporary routine workers each form one leaf of the "shamrock"). Handy was rated among the Thinkers 50, a private list of the most influential living management thinkers. In 2001, he was second on this list, behind Peter Drucker, and in 2005, he was tenth. When the Harvard Business Review had a special issue to mark the publication's 50th anniversary Handy, Peter Drucker, and Henry Mintzberg were asked to write special articles. In July 2006, Handy was conferred with an honorary Doctor of Law by Trinity College Dublin.
This is a book I recommend to anybody seeking an introduction to the theory and practise of modern organisations.
The book is divided into three parts: an introduction to concepts, a middle section on the application of the concepts discussed in the first part and a final bibliographic essay. Those concepts include motivation to work, roles and interactions, leadership, culture and questions of power and influence.
Detailed asides in marginal boxes give a taste of the classics - Taylor , McGregor , the influence of the success of Toyota and Japanese styles of industrial working led later to the development of theory z, Herzberg and Mintzberg in my opinion the most interesting because he is the most empirical - preferring to focus on what managers actually do in any given organisation as opposed to imagining what they should be doing.
It's a good first place to get acquainted with Belbin's team roles and Maslow's hierarchy of needs on your way to self actualisation which may not necessarily take you through any organisations.
Although the book is geared towards management, organisational thinking opens up new perspectives more generally on institutions ancient and modern. Issues of power, motivation and interpersonal dynamics are a constant in all organisations after-all.
This was one of the 100+ things I needed to read for my masters course and I cannot emphasize enough how distracting the sexism is in this “management bestseller.” It’s easily the worst thing I’ve read for my masters. I *was* in management in a large corporation and if I’d asked my team to read this I’d probably have had to talk to HR.
Examples? In a section titled “women in power” the author states “as a consequence of these, often well-intentioned, actions women in power tend to hug power to themselves and to be authoritarian.” There is more! “Professional people, one has noticed, often have undisciplined children.” No citations for that nugget of wisdom, I noticed. Oh and there’s this: “masculinity is connected with ambition...whereas it’s opposite, femininity, is more concerned with inter-personal relationships...and a sense of service.” Mmmmkay. My personal favorite is the tiny disclaimer the author places towards the beginning of the book that states while he uses the “he” pronoun for every example of leadership over 400 pages, the reader should assume that “he” stands for the universal “he” that includes women. Is it that difficult to write “She or he?” Or use a few examples that feature a woman? Evidently so.
There are an abundance of management books out there that aren’t blatantly sexist. I’d give this no stars if I could.
A clear, structured, witty account of research done on organisations illuminated through practical cases and Handy's personal experiences.
A few notes from reading:
1. "Seek simplicity - and having found it, suspect it." - James Conant 2. To appreciate the complexities and particularities in the world, in people and organisations... "There are different angles from which we view the world. The view will be slightly different from each, the truth will be a combination of all." 3. On Taylor's story from Images of Organisation (1986).... "We are all, in some way perhaps, the prisoners of our past and our models of organisations just reflections of our childhood. There is no truth, only personality. It is a sobering thought for any would-be theorist." 4. The 4 steps of learning: Questioning. Conceptualisation. Experimentation. Consolidation. 5. Tolstoy on reinforcing the self-concept (see Ressurection)... "Whatever a man's position may be, he is bound to take a view of human life in general that will make his own activity seem important and good.... We do not see that their ideas of life and of good and evil are corrupt and inspired by a necessity to justify their position, only because the circle of people with such corrupt ideas is a larger one and we belong to it ourselves." 6. The management of people -> humorously comparing it with driving or sex: "Most of us do it at least adequately thought perhaps we worry from time to time that we might do it better...." 7. The Halo effect / The Helicopter Factor 8. Alistair Mant: we need builders, not raiders (Leaders We Deserve, 1984) 9. "Managers are people who do things right and leaders are people who do the right thing." the principle conclusion of Bennis and Nanus'' study
A very comprehensive guide for anyone looking for the bigger picture of Hows these Organizations work , Be it a small or a large one . After reading this book I could clearly see through all types of organizations. Same Rules apply to military , construction firms two of which I have worked in .Also to Organized crime and Terror organizations. Must read for anyone stepping into the corporate world.
Overall a great read, almost a classic, especially considering this book is almost 40 years old. It was interesting to compare how business organizations have changed since, but also remained the same in so many (human) ways. It is a common sense book about the key issues in OB.