Dang, this was a fun read. A short horror/thriller that definitely deserves to be more well-known. The author captures the tension and the fear masterfully. It is very clear he knows how to set a mood. It did feel, however, that after setting the story’s stage with a fantastic atmosphere, Fairman didn’t have much idea in mind for how to end it. You go from the threat being the unknown, to monsters, to aliens, to a psychopath, then back to aliens so quickly it nearly gives you whiplash. I imagine his thought process going something like this:
“Okay so I have this city being completely - completely and totally - empty except for these five people. Excellent. That’s excellent. But why is the city empty? Hmmmm… this is a tough one. Aliens? Yeah, aliens sounds good. I’ll write these creepy alien monsters into the story. And I’ll have one nearly break down the door in a really terrific scene. Yeah! This is fun. But wait… what am I going to do with the aliens? Reveal that a member of the group has secretly been one the whole time? No, that’s too hard. Hmm… I know! I’ll throw in a psychopath with a gun! That’ll spice things up! Okay, things are going along nicely now. This is good… excellent. And now the psychopath plot line is taken care of! Yay… wait. Dangit, I need to wrap up the alien invasion plot. Hmmm, what to do? Throw in a cool plot about how the aliens are actually peaceful and it’s the humans that have to prove their morality? Yeah… no. That’s to much work. I’ll just scatter in a few lines about that. Instead I’ll just have the army miraculously show up as a deuce ex machina. And I’ll get rid of the aliens using the “earths atmosphere is poisonous to aliens” method from War of the Worlds. Yeah! I’m such a genius.” :)
All criticisms aside though; I would ardently encourage Deadly City as required reading to anybody wanting to learn how to capture a story’s mood with minimal exposition and show-don’t-tell technique. In that at least, it undeniably excels.