Plot Recap:
I got very excited about reading this book when I read the letter to the reader that appears at the beginning and was written by the Publisher. The line that really got me read, “As Publisher, I’ve gone to great lengths to keep this novel’s key plot points under lock and key so that you—the reader—could savor every page.”
The Publisher goes on to say that there are many turns and layers to this story and he didn’t lie. However, I would have preferred to have more foreshadowing of some of them as I would have paid better attention to Dr. Michael Capella, or “Cap,” when he went off on what I perceived to be a sidetrack. I’ll go into that more in the meat of my opinion in the next section of this review.
I’ll warn you now, if you want to read the book the way the Publisher obviously wanted it read, then stop now and go read it. I’ve got a lot to go over and most of it centers on those key plot points the Publisher talks about so I will be revealing them in order to talk about them in the next section. Still here? All right, great. On with the show.
The book starts off making you believe it is about Rebecca Shelton’s abduction by a creature that (of course) only the reader truly believes is Bigfoot. Well, her husband, Reed, saw it happen so he’s with you on that bandwagon. And so are the couple’s best friends, Dr. Michael Capella and his wife, Sing.
The search for Rebecca, or “Beck,” begins the morning after the failed survival lessons/camping excursion that led to the screams in the night and the flight through the woods. Then Beck fell (as all good little protagonists must do) and got snatched by a wooly critter. Her Sheriff’s Deputy husband and his boss lead the search to find her, with some conveniently essential help from Sing and her mobile crime lab complete with GPS units. Not that I don’t believe the GPS tracking wouldn’t play a part in finding a lost person, I just found it rather convenient that the person that supplied that happened to be good friends with our main characters. And that her husband supplied the other main plot push.
After gathering some fecal and hair samples from the woods, Sing’s husband, “Cap”, heads off to the lab where he was apparently run off from for being a biologist that didn’t buy Darwin’s evolutionary theory. And he finds, of course, some crazy DNA in those samples.
Not to get too “point-by-point” as far as the plot goes, Cap finds out that his former colleagues are up to no good, trying to prove that humans evolved from chimpanzees by mutating chimpanzees with human DNA. He also finds out that their efforts aren’t going so well because—although everyone knows chimp DNA is 98% the same as human DNA—mutations don’t work for the benefit of the creature.
My favorite parts of the book are the scenes of Beck and her captors, which turn out to be a troop of four Sasquatches that includes a male, two females and an adolescent that’s about Beck’s size. Ah-ha! So, the female that snatched Beck doesn’t have an offspring, but the offspring present is Beck’s size? I think you’re supposed to infer that, but never fear, there are a some obvious revelations later on that tell it to the slow people.
We’re left thinking these Sasquatches that have Beck are the product of scientific tampering, but then they start running from this wailing creature that Beck and Reed heard on the night Beck disappeared. Ah-ha! So there’s the beast that science created...right?
And I’ll tell you what I really think:
Before I go into the individual subsections within this section, I want to take a moment to say that I really enjoyed the map in this book. It appears at the beginning of each chapter and highlights the locations where the activity in the previous chapter occurred. That way, you’re not constantly flipping to a map at the beginning of the book and trying to figure out where those events took place.
Scenery: There’s an interview in the back of the book that implies that the scenery is great and that Mr. Peretti was able to get the surroundings across with minimal description. I thought it was easy just because I’ve traipsed through a forest or two in my lifetime so I don’t know how much confidence I have in that statement. In all actuality, some of the descriptions contradicted my experiences, but I’m willing to admit that forests are built differently. Otherwise, I didn’t need to know too much about my surroundings because of the way the action happened. With some stories, describing every test tube on the table in a lab lends nothing to the story. So, I wouldn’t say the scenery was remarkable, but I would say that the author certainly knew where to stop, which is just as good a compliment in my book.
Characters: Beck stutters. It’s kind of a big deal, given that it stems from a lack of confidence. She’s also the only one that had depth in my mind. She was the only one that I could feel and run around with and really see. Everyone else acted in the stereotypical ways that writers have always written people in those positions. Sometimes I think the only reason anyone in the real world acts like that these days is because they read too damn much.
Plot: Er, maybe “moral” would be a better word. The basic message of this book is this: God is good and Darwin is evil. Don’t get offended, that’s the basic message. There’s more to it than that.
The only animal that goes so far as to actually kill anybody (including Beck’s surrogate mother’s child) is the mutation that science made. And it is only one in a line of foul creatures that Cap stumbles upon in his investigation. The Sasquatches that have Beck are God’s creatures and as such only strike out to protect themselves and their little family. And they’re running from that Darwinistic demon.
My problem with the plot was the major shift in the storyline. I went into it thinking this was a “lady got snatched by Bigfoot” story, which is not something I’d ever care to read. Then, all the sudden, Cap gets his DNA results and goes off investigating these mutation experiments. (Whoa! What’s this dude up to now? Where did that come from?)
That shift came too abruptly and did not go smoothly at all. I like layers and I like major twists, but I also like feeling like I’m reading the same book from one page to the next.
Despite my gripe there, I did enjoy the fact that we had Cap, a Christian scientist, working that side plot that turned out to be the plot. (Not that he was a “Christian Scientist” but that he was a scientist that just happened to be a Christian and that’s a cool concept. Damn Christian Scientists, mucking up my review. Not that I’m speaking against Christian Scientists. Uh, review. Yes. Back on track.)
Anyway, Cap’s character comes the closest to having a real life force, next to Beck. I think that contradiction in his beliefs is what does it, though. And as soon as I knew that his side plot was the actual meat of the story I enjoyed reading his sections and wished I had followed him more closely from the start.
Overall: The progression of Beck’s character is what kept me turning the pages. More than once I caught myself flipping ahead to count how far away her next scene was. I think the moral could have been handled oh so much better, as it felt a flat and cliché to me. But when reading outside of my box, it’s going to take something great to impress me.
In the end I am glad I read it because it gave me some great ideas for writing forest scenes and it made me realize that Bigfoot isn’t a bad main character. I thought that basing the Sasquatches’ behavior on primates was predictable, but it’s also something that would be hard to get around.
The lingering questions: Where do Sasquatches fit in? Are they the missing link between man and ape that implies some of Darwin’s theories are correct? Or are they simply another ape, one of God’s creatures? I know the author implies the latter, but I like the freedom he gives me to attach some ambiguity to the message. And that is my favorite aspect of the book.