Since I wasn't going to believe this book as non-fiction no matter what the author said, it was a decent read.
It would have been better had it not been presented as truth, honestly, because the author kind of wandered off on tangents of story-telling that would have been interesting as "reenactment"-type scenes, but when its presenting itself as a scientific investigation, its really distracting to have these scenes. They included the death of two young women, and the motivations and life of 'Edward', among other things, where there is just no evidence for what the author is claiming happened (except in some cases the psychic readings of Jon which doesn't count). It kind of comes with the territory, but it was really obvious and distracting.
It was decent story-telling, though it kind of felt like a ripoff since they didn't actually DISCOVER ANYTHING. They didn't /quite/ get to where the body was supposed to be in any of the three searches they made. It was written like if situations had been /just slightly different// they //definitely/// would have found the evidence, so it practically counts, right?
No, it does not.
The pictures, also, what the hell, there was nothing in them/
Okay, that's all. It was a little boring, and I didn't buy the story, but it was what anyone should have expected from a true ghost story so I brought it on myself.