Outdated. Although published in 2014, it portrays Medicine as a means for Capitalism to enslave people by labeling them, as a tool for men to dominate and enslave women. While there have certainly been horrible examples of Medicine gone wrong (think Tuskeegee) or consciously used to suppress dissent (think Russians diagnosed with mental illness if they opposed Communism, back in the day), to paint all of Medicine with that brush, especially now that more than half of medical school graduates are women, seem unfair. There were some interesting parts about the medicalization of lives, and some philosophically interesting parts challenging that Medicine is not really an objective science like physics, but only a "soft" science, where the "knowledge" is twisted to meet the needs of the ruling class. There were also self-contradictions. In one chapter, cervical cancer screening is derided as a male-driven attempt to dominate and medicalize a woman's body. In another chapter, though, about race, the fact that in Australia aborigines are not screened for cervical cancer at near the frequency of white women, is derided as racist. Wouldn't that mean that at least aboriginal women were being spared the medicalization of their bodies?