George Bailey Sansom remains one of the notable English language historians of Japan. The great issue is that his work is now 60ish years old. Nonetheless, his first volume of his “A History of Japan” trilogy is fascinating. As I alluded to, the availability of scholarship on pre-modern Japan is scarce making this book a valuable resource despite its age and when reading this, considering this as well as the time period it was produced in, I felt Sansom gave a balanced account of Japan’s medieval beginnings without sacrificing much. His prose is academic and can be difficult at times, but generally I found this readable and highly informative. Sansom focuses on a few central themes that hold the book together throughout its nearly 470 pages, namely the influence of Chinese customs and ideas on Japanese culture, the power dynamics at play and the ultimate transition of Japanese governance from a unipolar to a multipolar system.
Sansom opens the book with a quick background of Japan as an island and the people who have historically inhabited it before turning into what we can assume and understand about early Japanese civilization. From the emergence of the early chronicles, we can clearly gleam the impact that Chinese culture had on the formation of Japanese society. Migration to the islands came mainly from Korea and with it ideas of morality, government and religion were all imported from China including Buddhism which remained a very influential moment in early Japanese history. The development of the Buddhist sects in Japan remain probably the most important pre-Heian development in Japanese history and it gets a lot of focus in the early goings of the book. Sansom takes the reader through the establishment of the early Yamato state and the eventual establishment of a permanent capital at Heian-kyo or Kyoto, which becomes the Imperial seat for the remainder of this book. From there, Sansom details the ins and outs of the aristocratic world of Kyoto during the Heian period, covering the social history, the religious history and of course the political history which saw the emergence of powerful clans like the Fujiwara who exercised control over Japanese governance for roughly two to three centuries. It is at this point that as the aristocrats in Kyoto grow wealthier and more aloof, reality sets in across the countryside leading to the development of a warrior class in the provinces. This culminates in the Gempei War between the Minamoto and Taira. The Minamoto’s victory in this conflict establishes the Kamakura Shogunate, the development of a feudal order and the dualistic government that is firmly entrenched within Japanese society by 1221. Sansom ends with a brief exploration of the Mongol invasions of 1274 and 1281 breaking down their failure and ultimate effect on the Bakufu (feudal government) and eventual end of the Hojo clan who controlled the Kamakura government to that point.
Along the way, Sansom goes into a ton of detail about various topics. I found his analysis of the changing ways land was divided, won, lost, conceived, created, etc as especially interesting. He notes early on that power in medieval Japan was land (where is it not) and that the feudal order was developed out of land relations as the aristocratic court gradually became less interested in that and more interested in culture, art and the like. We get good tracts on religion; the development of Buddhism, its division into the many sects such as Zen or Pure Land, its relationship with Shinto and how Shinto endured in society and how Buddhist monasteries established military forces. There is considerable time devoted to the rise of the military class in the 10th and 11th centuries, with emphasis on the eastern warriors. I found this part as well as the time spent on the development of the feudal societal order especially interesting. I admire that Sansom makes good use of the chronicles and textual sources of the period and does not fall on the assumption of the West that the Japanese are an inherently martial race, a perception unfortunately common at the time following World War II and common today. All in all there is good detail in this book and continues to likely be the standard for the historian who wishes to dig deeper than the pure synthesis.
This book will fall short of the five star label due to a lack of truly entertaining writing and riveting interpretation. This is moreso a narrative with the author picking and choosing where he wants to develop. You will see the words “deserves examination/consideration here” more times than you will like. The writing style was at times dull and repetitive. It also lacked any truly strong interpretation. This is a synthesis so there is nothing impressive argumentatively. This is OK, but the best synthesis’s are able to tie in an essential position on the given topic. Sansom does not do so. I am closer to a 3.5 star for this book due to its narrative strength and the amount I learned.