Having taken my time to read and reflect on Carl Sandburg’s Selected Poems, I find myself somewhat underwhelmed by the collection. I approached his work with an open mind, willing to engage with his themes, style, and reputation as a "poet of the people." However, after careful consideration, I cannot say I found his poetry particularly exciting or emotionally moving.
There is no doubt that Sandburg’s influence and acclaim are well-earned in certain respects. Poems like Fog, Chicago, and The People, Yes have been widely praised for a reason. However, my own reading experience left me feeling that much of his work lacked the depth or resonance I seek in poetry. His portraits, for instance, felt uninspiring—broad and general rather than sharp and revealing. His "Musings" section, like similar sections from many poets, seemed to consist of throwaway thoughts that were never truly meant for readership. While some might enjoy their casual, wandering nature, I found them disengaging.
I also struggled to connect with his protest poems, which felt distant and lacking the urgency that makes for truly powerful social critique. Only one love poem, An Interwoven Man and Woman Talked, stood out to me as compelling. His section on African Americans was especially problematic; Sandburg, despite his intentions, often approached Black life with an outsider’s gaze, reducing it to either stereotypes or broad statements of resilience rather than capturing the complexity and authenticity of lived experiences. Compared to poets like Langston Hughes or Gwendolyn Brooks, his handling of these themes felt superficial.
That said, I did find his anti-war poetry to be his most compelling work. Poems such as Old Timers, Murmurings in a Field Hospital, Salvage, Wars, A Million Young Workmen, 1915 (particularly its last line), Open Letter to the Poet Archibald MacLeish, and The Man with Broken Fingers (again, especially its last line) contained a rawness and poignancy that I found much more affecting than his other themes. There was a visceral quality to these poems that seemed more genuine than his broader reflections on America and its people.
Although The People, Yes is widely celebrated, I found TimeSweep to be the standout poem in the "Poet of the People" section, demonstrating some gorgeous phrase-making. Additionally, cantos 78 and 207 from The People, Yes struck me as particularly beautiful. These moments suggest that Sandburg was capable of greatness, even if much of his work didn’t resonate with me.
Ultimately, I respect Sandburg more than I enjoy him. His documentary approach to poetry, his embrace of free verse, and his focus on the working class were undoubtedly important in shaping American literature. However, I personally found his poetry lacking in emotional depth and stylistic richness. While I do not regret reading Selected Poems, I did not find it a particularly rewarding experience overall.