Our current economic system is unsustainable. Its fundamental elements, unlimited growth, and endless wealth accumulation fly in the face of the fact that the Earth's resources are clearly finite. In this work, the authors offer a comprehensive new economic model.
Many books decry human greed, describe the degradation of the environment and end with a few short pages recommending reform. This isn’t that type of book. Instead, from the first page, Canadian environmentalists Peter G. Brown and Geoffrey Garver agitate for a revolution in the way people use natural resources. They present an admirably solid case that the relationship between the Earth and the global economy must change, and soon. Whether their idealistic prescription (global governance institutions?) is realistic, however, remains to be seen. getAbstract recommends this book to leaders who seek a fresh perspective on sustainability and the economy.
Attempts to apply Quaker concepts of right relationship to the problem of transitioning to a sustainable global economy. Not sure the spiritual emphasis actually adds anything useful on this occasion. The first half mostly consists of Stating the Bloody Obvious regarding the mess we're currently in/heading for; the second half has a go at making some suggestions for how to fix it, but doesn't strike me as particularly realistic. Yes, no doubt the problem would be much easier to solve with a world reserve bank, global trusts of the commons, a global parliament and a functioning World Court, but I sincerely doubt that we can get there in the time we have to sort this out. On a smaller scale, holding up Stiftung Warentest (the German consumer association) as a model of how to get markets to take environmental issues seriously would impress me a lot more if you gave any hint of being aware of the existence of Which? and able to explain why it isn't doing the same job. Overall, the book seemed irritatingly Pollyanna-ish.
A good focus on looking at the economy beyond strictly what dollars measure. What impacts should we consider beyond what we think we see or what is conventionally focused on or measured. If we throw a pebble into a pond there is the ripple effect. What Population levels are sustainable, how much wealth is necessary, the role of technology ad what ethics are important. How do we get there?
Brown’s book, co-authored by individuals with varied backgrounds in economics and public policy, delves into the idea that “A thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, resilience, and beauty of the commonwealth of life.” The authors propose an equation and use it to ask some basic questions about economics; what is the economy for, how does it work, is it too big, can it be supported by the “commonwealth of all life,” and what is fair? The book also highlights four potential “global” institutions, intended to implement the book’s collective vision of a more ethical future. The authors conclude by suggesting four steps that can be taken to bring about necessary change, modeled on the campaign for the abolition of slavery in England in 1787. Reviews suggest that the discussion of these issues is well-informed and insightful. Dr. John Scull in Ecopsychology wrote that by shifting the goal from economic growth and sustainability to a “right relationship,” the book allows for a cooperation between the principles of the Earth Charter and the world economic, political and ecological systems. Scull calls this a “superb” analysis of the environmental situation. Reviewers agree that the book is well-researched and informative, providing a meaningful concept of this “right relationship” that gives readers a useful measure of their personal and collective decisions.
heavy-handed, repetitive and down-right silly at the end; still, Brown asks many questions that are worth thinking about. Hard to stomach if you're not already converted to living in the anti-economy.
A must read; this important book shows the relation between climate change and economy. We need a different system of governance, new institutions, and to strengthen the UN and make it independent of the United States.
Did the audio book. The narrator made it a huge chore. Their enunciation was way too stiff. Outside of that the book seems very influential. So influential that it seems out of date. Most of the thinking is fairly mainstream at this point. Great resources. Needs an updated edition or a sequel.