The good news is that Meade Kirkpatrick Read is a very fine writer; the bad news is Kirk Read is a very horrible person. This book is filled with his rebellious, leftist, law-breaking homosexual life that all occurs before the age 18! He spends a lot of words (including a few really boring chapters that seem to be added to make him sound normal) justifying his early teen long-term sexual affairs with two older men, both of whom should have been arrested on the publication of this book. Read not only broke the law dozens (if not hundreds) of times, he lived a completely selfish life that he wants to brag about.
If you want a shining example of a gay coming of age story, this isn't it. If you want a perfect example of all that's wrong with an intolerant, bigoted, stereotyping homosexual who wants to allow little children to be sexually abused by older men (he mentions it being okay at age 12), then this is the memoir for those wanting to prove how anti-moral some in the gay community can be.
There is so much wrong with this life story it's shocking that it even was published since it on multiple pages promotes pedophilia as being a "normal" way for an early teen to explore his sexuality and encourages all parents to allow young children to "question their sexuality" freely with adults without providing any moral or practical guidance.
The author was a little rich kid whose dad was a lifelong military man Republican that was on his fourth marriage; his mother was almost two decades younger, ignored her husband and allowed her son to explore his sexually with men that were also two decades older. See a correlation? Young Read copied his mother in hungering for a much older man and in his rebellion against anything remotely traditional.
One of the major issues is that many of the stories in the book are just too clever to be true, with convenient endings that sound like something in a movie script. I'm not saying some of the things didn't occur, but they are all neatly packaged and exaggerated to his advantage. He has the standard creative non-fiction note at the front of the book that names and circumstances have been changed, but the text left me filled with incredulity. So many gay autobiographers use creative non-fiction spin to create stories to promote an agenda.
In this case the writer claims harassment by redneck school bullies occurred for years, calling him the gay f-word non-stop while teachers ignored every instance they witnessed. He had large groups of people constantly mocking him in public places. I worked in education for decades and never once heard the things he claims to have been spewed on him in his very upper-class school, nor did I ever see teachers refuse to step in when a student was bullied as bad as Read claims.
The author goes out of his way to put down conservatives, anyone religious, authority figures (except the hot older males), the military, and any rules whatsoever. He includes the standard anti-Reagan falsehood about how the 80s president "cost hundreds of thousands of lives" by not tackling the AIDS crisis sooner. In truth, Kirk Read, the reason many gay men died during that time was because they made bad choices regarding having sex without protection or commitment and should shoulder the responsibility for taking the risk of acquiring any sexually transmitted disease. The government is not the parent nor the automatic bailout to citizens making bad health choices.
He drinks freely from his early teens, smokes, does some drugs, drives illegally (drunk driving the same week he helps the mothers against drunk driving group), escapes his house in the middle of the night, lies non-stop, and does a whole lot of things that should have gotten him in big trouble. Instead his father acts ignorant (tired of raising other much older kids) and his mother thinks their son needs to learn about life by experience. Both of his parents should be ashamed of how they raised him to be a self-centered jerk who has plenty of compassion for young boys that want sex with adult males but zero interest in tolerance toward anyone else.
The writer promotes the acceptance of childhood sexual assault as being normal and without punishment. He even includes ridiculous meetings he had with a therapist who tells him at age 17 that he's the only "normal" one in his family that includes conservatives and born-again Christians. Right. If anything, this book is proof of Read's dramatic undiagnosed mental illness.
The author was a radical from his youth and uses this book to propagate his immoral views of life. He doesn't hide it, at one point saying it only takes one or two LGBT rebels to eventually turn a community on its head. He says that can be teacher, librarian, coach or student, and the point of the book appears to be to empower others to embrace his anti-moral behavior in order to hurt others and society. "The gay rights movement would be a lot more interesting if sixteen=year-olds were drafting press releases and mission statements for political organizations." Sorry, Kirk Read--know-it-all, intolerant, unintelligent, anti-representation teen radicals are the problem and not the solution.
Read spent most of his teen years penning voluminous diary entries, poems, and plays that dealt with his unusual addiction to sex with older men (resulting in him becoming a very good writer). The "snap" of the title deals with an older high school friend teaching him to snap in flamboyant gay style to rub his selfish attitude in others faces. But instead of "How I Learned to Snap," this should have been titled "How I Learned to Write Crap."
Some of us in or supportive of the gay community do not believe it's okay for 12-year-old boys to freely be used for sex by men that are two decades older and that parents should provide moral guidance for making good decisions that impact society. Someone needs to call Kirk Read (and others like him) on what this immoral propaganda really is.
Snap.