For devotees of the submarine espionage stories in Blind Man's Bluff, Rising Tide tells the Soviet/Russian side of the most secretive operations of the Cold War. For the first time, seven Soviet admirals, along with leading naval historian Dr. Gary Weir, reveal the successful spying missions, the technological breakthroughs, the confrontations with U.S. forces, and the undersea disasters that killed many hundreds of sailors.With decades of experience on submarines or commanding submarine fleets, these seven senior admirals, many highly decorated, give us the inside stories. They detail the undersea successes such as the blockade of the U.S. submarine base in Bangor, Washington, and the innovative surveillance techniques they developed to trail the U.S. Sixth fleet in the Mediterranean. They reveal the development of the first nuclear submarines, profiling Dr. Peregudov, the father of the Soviet nuclear submarine and the internecine battles among Soviet bureaucrats that led to the deaths of many Russian sailors. And they give first hand accounts of deadly confrontations, such as the sinking of K-219, off Bermuda and the collision of USS Taurog and the Soviet K-108, including unpublished photos of the incident's aftermath. Rising Tide also reveals the many catastrophes and the occasional heroic rescues, and answers many questions surrounding the sensational loss of the Kursk, the most advanced vessel in the Russian fleet.Covering submarines from the first advanced diesel subs in the 1950s to the Kursk in 2000, with the authority only senior naval officials could deliver, Rising Tide is the complete story of the Soviet side of the gripping, secret life of the submariners in the Cold War.
This is mostly a collection of highly personal stories with the back drop of Soviet submarine development. The book is at times exciting and quite illuminating, such as the cause of intense Soviet submarine operations off the coast of America from 1985-87. Since submarine operations on both sides remain classified, this book, much like Blind Man's Bluff, is more anecdotal than analytic or narrative. One really respects the Soviet sailor for taking on a superior opponent with faulty equipment.
I took a star off because the book only rarely rises above its lack of scope. It promises a major reassessment of Groshkov but only partially delivers. Some research seems shoddy; it is hotly debated how much the CIA got out of raising K-129 (I belong to the debacle school of thought). The psychology of the Soviet sailors and officers is hinted at but never fully explicated, leaving one to feel the book was half-finished. The occasional remarks against the Soviet system, while generally accurate, can seem a bit one-sided. More importantly, in light of the abysmal conditions in Russia today, the Soviet Union might have been the only truly functional communist state. This book was certainly written in the high mark of American good feelings about "winning" the Cold War and before Putin made many Russians recall why they miss the days of Brezhnev.
Though quite as exciting as Blind Man’s Bluff, this history delivers an important mirror image view into Russian and Soviet Cold War and post Cold War submarining.
It is clear that Russian boats lagged behind Western technology, yet Russian submariner’s will still able to exploit their ships to offset some of the technological lack. Undersea encounters always lead to the Soviet Navy and the U.S. Navy leaving the encounter better equipped for the next.
Overall, the book is a page turner, as the Russian crews and officers were intriguing characters floating in a sea of unnecessary political interference and a general disregard for crew wellbeing.
On the humorous side, the authors repeat the misconception that a nuclear reactor can explode like a fission or thermonuclear weapon, a common lay error.
A very good history of the soviet submarine fleet of the cold war. It's based on interviews with actual soviet sub commanders who pull no punches in describing what they had to deal with to keep their crews alive and motivated. Safety of the crew took an absolute back seat to the mission and the projection of soviet power. Includes a chapter on the post-soviet period and the loss of the Kursk.
I think this book should have been a lot more critical of the Russian Navy. It is not just the same as the U.S. though no one doubts their courage and dedication. They have a history of maintenance disasters because curiously the lack of the freedom to speak their minds as yard workers has an adverse effect on quality control. Anyways, a good book over all but could have been less biased.
As a Cold War Submarine Veteran, I found this most interesting. To serve under water for you country is not an easy job. Most people would have a hard time doing it. I thank the author for the information given here and send my respects to All those who have served under the sea. I recommend this book.
I chose to read this based on other Gary Weir works. If you are looking for a review of cold war submarine activity from the Soviet/Russian perspective, this is one of the better I've found. Pretty extensive section on Kursk.
Great book on Soviet submariners and their boats. Many fascinating accounts of Soviet sub exploits and accidents both. The material comes from the authors' interviews with former Soviet admirals and captains. Great read.
Lots of interesting stories about the Soviet silent service. Safety definitely took a back seat to rapid construction and innovation. The sailors on the boats were consummate professionals and did an amazing job with often shoddy equipment. Worthy adversaries to the West during the Cold War.
I enjoyed this book but I didn't feel it was great, just average. I had read years ago the book "Blind Man's Bluff" about the US submarine forces and feel that was a better book from what I remember.
This book covers the history behind the Soviet naval build up as they competed with the US during the cold war.
The story is interesting that in attempting to match (and they sometimes exceeded) the US in technology and ability, they pushed their technology and men to the limits and beyond. One can't help but have admiration for the personal serving aboard the submarines. But in reading of the shoddy construction of their subs and the seemingly frequent accidents it's a wonder that there weren't more deaths.
The Russian command and control structure seemed to be very weak too. Submarine commanders were allowed whether to decide to use nuclear tipped torpedoes for example vs my view that in the US Navy the use of nuclear weapons has to be cleared with headquarters.
This is a must read for anyone interested in submarines. It concentrates on the USSR submarine fleet. This book has many things going for it. It contains a very good background history of the Russian/ USSR navy. It put many historical news items that one may have only heard in piecemeal fashion, in retrospect, such as the various disabled shouldering USSR subs that literally popped-up. All in all, I thought this book provided invaluable new information.
An interesting look at the Cold War strategy of the Soviet Navy. Good content thanks to interviews with high-ranking Soviet officers during the time period. However, has no real flow to the book, which takes away from the overall enjoyment of it.
I found parts engaging - for instance the chapter on the Cuban missile crisis. But in general I find history more engaging when you can either focus on specific characters or get a more sweeping story. This educated me about a topic of which I knew little... but sadly the narrative was lacking
Great read from the Soviet side of the submarine espionage and dogfights under the water that took place in the Cold War. Filled with personal accounts of various Russian sub commanders, the book is easy to read and exciting. Even includes inside accounts of the loss of the Kursk in 2000.
An excellent history of the Soviet and later Russian submarine forces. Weir documents far too many needless tragedies inflicted upon the brave submariners.
I don't usually read nonfiction. What can you say about them? Mostly they are just collections of facts. While this was interesting, it didn't move me. As my two stars indicate, it was just OK.