In this book, Margulis/Sagan make a forceful argument for a distinct biologically-based worldview. Life draws from the sun and non-living matter. Life transforms and uses energy and matter for life-sustaining purposes. The animal and plant kingdoms draw from and consist of the bacteria (non-nucleated cells) and protoctists (simple nucleated cells) that represent the first two (in time)life kingdoms (fungi is the third kingdom). The authors are champions of the two "lowest kingdoms" because of the central role they have performed in our development and because most of academic and popular biology neglects this part of life's history.
Live involves living interactions with other life, with the environment and with the biosphere. 'Life' is better understood as a verb, not as a noun, the authors write, and they differ from what they see as a neo-Newtonian view in contemporary evolutionary theory where organic beings are seen as "things" acted upon by "forces." In the most interesting part of this book, Margulis/Sagan discuss a contemporary of Darwin, Samuel Butler, who criticized Darwin for being overly deterministic (evolution by natural selection, but neglecting life's active, cooperative-seeking impulses). The authors discuss Butler's perspective at length, emphasizing that life is very much about direction and goal setting. "All life is teleological," they write. Life "strives." All beings, including bacteria, "make choices" about how they interact with the environment, and choices involve "discrimination, memory, learning and instinct." Of those who separate humanity from the rest of life because of mind, Margulis/Sagan pull us back to our roots. "Thinking " is like "excreting and ingesting." It is "an emergent property of cell hunger, movement, growth, association, programmed death, and satisfaction."
As in the authors' other works,('Acquiring Genomes' (2001) and 'What is Sex' (1997)), this book's narrative is uneven. While much of it soars with biological vision, much of it also gets bogged down in hard-to-understand technical language that, unfortunately, involves key concepts. We know that bacteria are immortal because they trade (via division) genes with each other horizontally whereas in other kingdoms genes move vertically from one generation to the next through sex and reproduction. The description of this key transition in life's evolution is difficult to follow. We also learn that death must be part of sexual reproduction, but here too the description is difficult to follow. At times, one comes frustratingly close to understanding what is involved in the life-sex-death connection, but without being able to move it across the finish line.
Life's continuity through change is a key theme for the authors. While it is the capacity for change that allows life's identity to continue through time, we don't know from this book what essence underlies life that allows this continuity to continue while changing. While the authors concede that answers about life's essence remain tentative, it almost appears that life's survival purpose is the accidental but emergent product of non-life chemicals coming together in such a way that genes and molecules self-replicate (bacteria) and then (in animals) reproduce sexually. The authors, however, seem to want to move the purpose question in a different direction by tying it to the 2nd law of thermodynamics. They argue that life's purpose is to use the sun's energy and dissipate its heat and, thereby, further promote the cosmic movement toward entropy. This is the least convincing part of their argument. It would seem that solar energy would dissipate regardless of life's presence or, if life accelerates this cosmic processing, it could be an accidental by-product of life's survival imperative that developed for other reasons. Regardless of either of these scenarios, in the end, the movement toward entropy would seem to continue despite the momentary cosmic presence of life.