I have a long-standing argument with my wife. “What is the worst character flaw?” I ask her. “Rage” she answers. “Because when you lose control, you destroy everything indiscriminately.” “But rage,” I give my time-worn rebuttal, “can be useful. To rage against poverty or violence or injustice; to rage against harm done to those we love. To rage against someone who attacks us. That gives us energy and resolve. Envy,” I go on, “envy is the worst character flaw. Envy is a toxic green cancer, a mold that rots away everything.”
I just finished the travelogue “In Cuba” by Ernesto Cardenal, Nicaragua’s (in)famous communist priest, de-frocked by John Paul for taking a ministerial position in the godless communist government of the pedophile Daniel Ortega, and re-frocked by current-Pope Francis (I’ll let y’all guess why…). Cardenal went to Cuba on revolutionary tourism, to see firsthand the glories of the redistributionist society of Fidel Castro and his merry band of thieves and murderers.
There’s something particularly gross about Latin American banana communism. It is different from the USSR’s variety. One could even be impressed by the extraordinary industrialization of early Soviet communism – their answer, 60 years later, to England’s industrial revolution; and a revolution equally impressive. I’m not justifying the “evil empire”, but having lived in the post-Soviet Union it’s impossible not to tip your hat at what they achieved. But banana communism is totally uninspiring. A bunch of miserable mediocre motherfuckers bitching about those who were more successful while sitting around in stolen houses, sharing baggies of beans and writing crappy poetry or singing pouty songs.
Fidel Castro’s Cuba pretended to be bees, all a-buzz and united in one glorious purpose of building the hive. But what they really were, were vultures picking over an increasingly-pestilent and rotted carcass of a dead country. Chavez’s Venezuela was like that — the first years, while he was leveraging the moribund oil company and redistributing the industries of a middle-class country, one could be confused that the “revolution” was working. But 15 years after the oil money ran out and the companies ran aground; after the carcass is picked clean there is nothing to see except misery and no feelings left except contempt.
Cardenal, however, is guilty of a greater sin. He was a Trappist monk who studied under Thomas Merton and went to found a socialist peasant ‘paradise’ on an island in Lake Nicaragua, called Solentiname. “The Gospel in Solentiname” is a devotional of sorts for Liberation Theology, Latin American Catholicism’s singular addition to our community of faith (I’ll review these books later, I do have some thoughts about them). Christianity should let us think about more than our poverty; Jesus himself taught us to find the deep wellsprings of generosity and humanity in our own misery.
My problem is, of course, that there was nothing epic in Cardenal’s experience of Cuba’s revolution. There was nothing there about wonder; about the transcendental; about the metaphysical — our ancient faith that started in a dusty village beside a little lake 2000 years ago went on to inspire something magnificent. The great church. The most missionary and mysterious “Church of the East” — and gave us the Hagia Sophia and da Vinci and laid the foundation for the Judeo/Christian world order in which we live now. A world-altering idea. But Cardenal’s “Liberation Theology” only festers with envy, channeling the bitter who just want to live in somebody’s bigger house. There are no divine motivations to be found, only the most ordinary and base of humanity.
That’s all I have. I don’t know what I was expecting, but “In Cuba” made Cardenal — who may have been remarkable, likely could have even been extraordinary — into a much smaller person. That is what the cancer of envy does. Beware.