3.5 stars, rounded up. Not one of Furst's best, but still a brilliantly bleak and realistic portrayal of life under Nazi occupation in France during WW2. Still learned more from this novel than I ever did in a history class, and as with other books by Furst, I was still compelled to look up every detail while my interest in the time period increased exponentially. And, as always, Furst' characterizations are incredible: many times I was compelled to pause and consider, "what if that had been me?" What does one do in a situation in which one is confronted with no good choices? In which one's decision is between betraying friends, family, and country, or being sent to a Nazi camp? In which one has to lie and embellish as a matter of course? What I love about Furst is that he does not sensationalize, his characters are not supermen, and the game is not a simple binary one of virtue vs. vice, evil vs. goodness. The world he portrays is messy, complicated, filled with people with competing and complex desires, needs, and values.
Now, my beef with this particular novel is twofold:
1. About 1/3 of the book is written in sentence fragments. Furst does this in his other books, too, but it's less jarring when it only occurs at the beginning of each chapter/section. Now, some literary writers can get away with unique stylistic quirks, but Furst' writing is not so poetic in nature that it can pull of fragments successfully... The World at Night was really getting on my nerves by the end--if I had not known Furst for the amazing author he can be, I probably would have quit at some point before reaching the end for this reason.
2. The story is just so mushy-gushy and makes a lot less sense than the others in the series. In the middle of war, occupation, life-and-death situations, etc, all our main guy can think about is being with his girl. I read these for the WW2 portrayal, and not for the Harlequin-esque aspects. Now while I do appreciate that war tore loved ones apart and romantic love suffered as a consequence, and since this can be an important aspect overlooked in "research" or academics of the period--a novel or two about romantic love in the occupation is fine. But I am not appreciating that each and every single one of Furst' books in this series seem to eventually spiral around a love-story. Yes, romantic love is important, but it's not everything, and I'd be much more interested in other aspects of life during WW2 than lovers torn apart by fate and by stupidity or by unexplained plot twists (WHY oh why did the girl, Citrine, go to Lyons, in the unoccupied zone? We are never told, it seems just an artificial way to separate the lovers and to create a plot/tension...)