Showing how science is limited by its dominant mode of investigation, Lincoln and Guba propose an alternative paradigm―a "naturalistic" rather than "rationalistic" method of inquiry―in which the investigator avoids manipulating research outcomes. A "paradigm shift" is under way in many fields, they contend, and go on to describe the different assumptions of the two approaches regarding the nature of reality, subject-object interaction, the possibility of generalization, the concept of causality, and the role of values. The authors also offer guidance for research in the field (where, they say, naturalistic inquiry always takes place). Useful tips are given, for example, on "designing" a study as it unfolds, establishing "trustworthiness," and writing a case report. This book helps researchers "both to understand and to do naturalistic inquiry." Of particular interest to educational researchers, it is valuable for all social scientists involved with questions of qualitative and quantitative methodology.
I thoroughly enjoyed the organization and writing style of this book, but had trouble giving it more stars because I also thoroughly disagreed with a lot of the claims made! For anyone interested in qualitative research and inquiry, this is a must read to get a sense of the 'debate' in the field. Otherwise, give it a miss :)
A thorough guide to naturalistic inquiry and a thorough critique of the positivist. It may be hard to agree with everything said in the book but it will be very difficult not to admire how the author formulated their ideas. It is a phenomenal contribution to the field of qualitative inquiry.