Oh, Nick Bantock, how disappointed I was in you for this book! The one thing that really kept me going throughout was the illustration/design on the bottom of each page. Even then, Mr. Bantock, your art in the "Griffin and Sabine" series far outshines this.
Perhaps in your desire to write a coming-of-age tale, you forgot that the audience likes to find common ground with the, in this case, heroine? For indeed, I found that she was flawless, completely and utterly flawless. Removing her flaws certainly removed her humanity: the girl was too perfect to exist in real life, and practically every male that she met desired her in some way. She has the amazing fortune of having everything in the novel fall into her lap, from a job to room and board. The quest that your heroine had undertaken, I thought, was severely underdeveloped. It seemed that more was spoken of her romantic encounters, and said encounters did not change or seem to affect your heroine in any significant way. The resolution of the book was meaningless to me, as, again, I cared little for the heroine or her quest. Indeed, sir, I charge you with creating what is known online as a "Mary Sue".
This strikes me as more of a pity, for you have shown us in other books what you are truly capable of producing in works of fiction. "Wallflower" had the potential to be truly intriguing, intricate, moving novel about the changes a young woman goes through to find herself and save her people.
As it was, it was merely a novel about a two-dimensional character and her amazing good fortune as she literally danced through life. That is not real, sir! That is not thought-provoking, nor moving. It is merely irritating.
P.S. Was it *really* necessary to switch the P.O.V. every chapter? (The answer, sir, is that no, no it was not. The girl didn't have any thoughts that were particularly interesting to read)