What do you think?
Rate this book
Logic
This is a reproduction of a book published before 1923. This book may have occasional imperfections such as missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. that were either part of the original artifact, or were introduced by the scanning process. We believe this work is culturally important, and despite the imperfections, have elected to bring it back into print as part of our continuing commitment to the preservation of printed works worldwide. We appreciate your understanding of the imperfections in the preservation process, and hope you enjoy this valuable book.
528 pages, Paperback
First published July 1, 2007
2 people are currently reading
12 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
April 5, 2019
A quote from the book:
“Since then, the Kantian principle of antinomies which underlies the Logic of Mansel and Hamilton has boldly come to the front in England under the shadow of the great name of Hegel, and English logicians have either ranged themselves under the banner of one or other of these new schools, or else have sought to cover the glaring inconsistencies of some one of them with patches borrowed from the others, until the modern student has a bewildering choice among a series of guides, each of whom follows a path of his own, leading in the end to obscurity and confusion and self- contradiction, but who are all united in this, that they discard and misrepresent the traditional teaching of Aristotle and of the mediaeval logicians.”
Their philosophy is confusing and contradicts itself, and as shown by many they make caricatures of what Aristotle and St. Thomas actually said. Unfortunately it is because of these clowns that many think philosophy which is the supreme science to be more or less useless. Truth does not change even if most people are not defending it. The rule of the modern “philosophers” is non serviem(I will not serve).
And here is the book in english: https://archive.org/details/cu3192403...
“Since then, the Kantian principle of antinomies which underlies the Logic of Mansel and Hamilton has boldly come to the front in England under the shadow of the great name of Hegel, and English logicians have either ranged themselves under the banner of one or other of these new schools, or else have sought to cover the glaring inconsistencies of some one of them with patches borrowed from the others, until the modern student has a bewildering choice among a series of guides, each of whom follows a path of his own, leading in the end to obscurity and confusion and self- contradiction, but who are all united in this, that they discard and misrepresent the traditional teaching of Aristotle and of the mediaeval logicians.”
Their philosophy is confusing and contradicts itself, and as shown by many they make caricatures of what Aristotle and St. Thomas actually said. Unfortunately it is because of these clowns that many think philosophy which is the supreme science to be more or less useless. Truth does not change even if most people are not defending it. The rule of the modern “philosophers” is non serviem(I will not serve).
And here is the book in english: https://archive.org/details/cu3192403...
March 8, 2011
i need to learn how correctly use my reason, before using it, without it i can not be "reasonably" happy.....first book i stonehedge college series....introduction to scholastic(traditional catholic ) type of thinking...not bad...i wanna be happy
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews