MAN. That's some fucked up shit, right there. I have so much to say that I don't know where to begin. I've seen the movie, I knew what to expect - but I still feel a deep sadness, revulsion, and shock after finishing the book. It's just... traumatizing. Brilliant, but traumatizing.
I'll say now that if you're concerned about spoilers - just move on. I cannot avoid spoilers in this one... so continue reading if you want, but don't bitch if you get spoiled on the book or movie.
It's been years since I've seen the movie, but it stuck with me. There are some images & feelings the movie evoked in me that just stay with me. When I hear the title, or even just the word "Requiem", or the Kronos Quartet music, these images and feelings surface. I don't recall every moment of the movie, but the amount that stuck with me was enough to make this reading experience like re-watching it. After I finished, I did re-watch, and though there are differences (some of them major), mostly the adaptation sits right in the book's lap. Page 1, reading Harry steal his mom's TV to pawn it for dope money, it was like watching the movie in my head.
This is a rare situation, though, because I'm comparing the book to the movie, rather than the reverse. I try to go out of my way to avoid seeing adaptations prior to reading the book (if I can), but I saw this first when I was 18 and didn't know it was a book until over a decade later. The only other time I've done this was with Children of Men, a movie I really liked & a book I fucking hated. Clearly I didn't hate this, though. In fact, I kind of loved it. The movie was pretty damn accurate to the book, but didn't quite have the same depth. The book did a better job at portraying the inner thoughts of the characters - especially with Sara.
The book spends a lot more time showing the slow descent into desperation for these addicts. The movie kind of seems like a long PSA/worst-case-scenario cautionary tale. "Do drugs and this is how you could end up!" And, while that's valid to an extent, (and could also be said about the book), I think the movie almost loses sight of the fact addiction is a disease, not just a result of an action. This is made much clearer in the book, in my opinion. The movie touches on it briefly - a little scene where Harry and Marion are talking about Sara's TV habit, for instance, but for the most part it just shows the most dramatic and horrifying aspects and kind of doesn't have time for the everyday problems of addiction.
Side note here: There's a lot of stereotyping in the book - the Jewish mother figure, her Yenta friends, the late-70s black character, the uber-racist South, etc. There's a lot of it, and it's extreme. But it's necessary, I think. This is not a subtle book. It's an intense in-your-face-with-a-2x4 kind of book, so I think that if the characters weren't also shown in extremes, it would have felt inconsistent to me. The movie does away with much of that, and I feel like it also takes away some, maybe a lot, of the impact.
The movie also glosses over some of the non-addiction-based ugliness shown in the book. Sara's care is a big, big, big one to me. In the book it's... horrifying. HORRIFYING. The movie portrays the care she receives at the end in a not-very-patient-friendly kind of way... but it's still care. The doctor tries various things, the orderlies are firm almost to the point of being rough - but you can see they are trying to help her even if it seems cruel. This is a sanitization of what's portrayed in the book. Sara, confused, lost in her own starvation- and drug-induced haze, is put into a horrific situation, where every act of trying to force food into her is like rape. There's not only a lack of care, but a lack of human decency, kindness, and empathy in general. It's frightening and terrifying to think that some bureaucratic pencil-pusher can strip someone of their basic human dignity simply to avoid authority conflicts.
Another example is how Tyrone is treated in the south. Some of the tone remains in the movie, but again it's a much milder version. In the book, Tyrone and Harry are hated universally once they step foot below the Mason/Dixon line. They are treated cruelly, as sub-human, because they are addicts. But Tyrone gets it worse, because he's black. They are arrested for vagrancy. FUCKING. VAGRANCY. OMG. I saw this and my stomach clenched. It makes me so angry and literally sickens me. Arrest them because they have fucking HEROIN in the car. Or because they are clearly intoxicated. Or for suspected car theft (because the car wasn't theirs), or for driving without a license (because they don't have one) or fucking any number of reasons that aren't the most fucked up and discriminatory one ever. Arrest them and follow due process, and I can understand. But this is horrific hatred that should have ended long before this book was set. But... of course, that's not how the world works, unfortunately.
The movie shows almost none of that racism based brutality. There's a general tone of suspicion and dislike, and a cruelty in general, but it is not overt in the movie, and it isn't even close to the book depiction. The movie doesn't say what they are arrested for, just that they were recognized as addicts and the police were called. I actually am disappointed that the overt racism was taken out of the movie. There's a scene in the book where they stop for gas, and the attendant won't serve them, lies about being out of gas, and that the bathroom is out of order, and spits on them... for nothing more than because Tyrone is black and Harry is a "n***** lover". Harry begins to argue, but Tyrone just gets back in the car to leave because he knows, even though he's never experienced THIS kind of racism before, just how ugly it can get. His treatment in jail in the book is fucking disgusting, and the movie completely avoids the topic - making it look like it's just a cruelty towards addicts, not that it's racism.
The exception to the movie 'softening' is Marion's situation. The book hints at the "play time" she participates in. "With other girls" and "she didn't know what she'd be doing" and "the smell on her lips and fingers" is pretty much all that we get in the book. But the movie goes very visual and very pull-no-punches there. I was kind of surprised by this, because I expected the book to be grittier and uglier in every way - including Marion's willingness to sell herself for her addiction. But the movie portrayed that very accurately, just elaborating on that one scene.
Other differences are more subtle. For instance, a lot of scenes where Harry & Tyrone struggled to find dope were left out of the movie. There's a tiny mention of it, where their dealer is killed out of nowhere, but that's not in the book. So the fear, anger, and need that's present is out of place because it's never really shown that there's just shortage, and EVERYONE has been desperate for months. This is the catalyst for the end of the book that spurs the decision to try to go to Florida and get weight for their dope-security, but it just feels shunted into the movie awkwardly.
Another subtle change is that Marion and Harry don’t have sex in the movie, though in the book they do many times. It's a kind of juxtaposition of how she feels when selling sex for her habit compared to how she feels having sex with Harry. The lack of sex in the movie, I think, is a nod to that relationship - that it's more than just physical, and that they really do love each other but the addiction, their elephant in the room, overwhelms that connection and makes them resent each other.
In the book, there's no closure or reconciliation, not even acceptance, as shown in the movie. Harry doesn't call Marion from jail, or even think about her. He only thinks about his arm and his pain. The further they get from NY, the further she is from his mind. His concern and focus gets smaller and smaller the further he and Tyrone drive, until it's centered on his infection to the exclusion of all else.
Harry and Tyrone’s relationship in the book starts to splinter as well. They hold back money and dope from each other, their addiction taking precedence over their friendship. At the end of the book, Tyrone is... almost de-humanized, in a way. Not only because of his withdrawal causing him to suffer, but also due to the treatment he experiences in the southern jail, all of which he blames Harry for. If he'd not suggested this trip, if he'd not kept shooting into his infected arm... if he'd done this or that differently, Tyrone wouldn't be in this situation. In the movie, that resentment doesn't exist - they are friends till the end (or, Tyrone is Harry's friend. Harry is sick.) Tyrone's need is present, and painful, but his friendship and concern for Harry's life trumps that. The book... not so much.
In both versions, poor Sara is alone with her own pain and needs and delusions. Her struggles are the most closely matched between the book and movie. She is the character that I feel the most for, who breaks my heart the most. The book really shows her loneliness and sadness a lot more than the movie, BUT Ellen Burstyn does a great job filling a lot of those gaps - the scene with Harry when he calls her out for being on pills is gut-wrenching. With four words, you can feel a decade's worth of sadness there. "I'm old. I'm alone." It gives me chills. Ellen Burstyn just brings her to life and makes her real and so sad.
Book Sara doesn't quite have that same power. By which I mean that I feel a huge amount of empathy for her character, and sadness and rage at how her life spirals out of control, all for want of being wanted and having nobody to speak on her behalf or help her. But it's more of a generalized "If this happened to anyone, I would feel this way" feeling, rather than identification with HER specifically.
Both versions have unresolved endings - but in the movie it's interesting to note that they throw a little symbolism in there. All four characters curl into a fetal position at the end, and both women are smiling. Two women who have fallen so far down that their only concern is their addiction. Sara's had a complete break from reality, hallucinating a happy TV reunion with Harry, and that's all she's really ever wanted anyway. Marion is just content that she's got a regular supply of dope, if she's willing to earn it. That’s security to her, and nothing else matters. Both men are crying, thinking about the dreams they've lost. Tyrone’s is to be safe and secure with a caring, supportive woman (his mother); and Harry’s thinking about how things have gone so bad with Marion.
There's really nothing to hope for with any of them. Harry has a habit of drowning his every feeling in heroin, and that won’t get easier after losing his arm, his friend, his girlfriend, and his mother. If he actually were to get treatment, he might make it - but where he is, I don't see anyone making an effort for him. Same with Tyrone, who has lost his friend, his freedom, his dignity, etc. With treatment, he might be OK, but if they just release him at the end of his sentence, he'd go right back to using. Marion, who has lost just about everything as well, her life now consists of selling sex to make a score to last her until the next one. Even if she were to have someone step in and try to help her, it wouldn't do any good. She's intelligent, manipulative, and she wants to feel good, not hurt mentally and physically. She doesn't have coping mechanisms, so I don't see her breaking the cycle either. Sara makes me the saddest, because Harry recognized what was happening, and could have stopped it if he tried, but instead he abandoned her because it was easier.
I want to talk about the writing style, and how I kept comparing it to the cinematography. I am impressed with how similar they feel. Darren Aronofsky truly captured the the feel.
But the writing style is messy. It worked because the BOOK is messy. It's spastic, urgent, shifting, and hazy, and it really FEELS that way. Run-on sentences abound (I think the longest I saw was 4 pages long), but they are put to good use. This was a scene where Harry is waiting for Marion to come home after he 'suggests' that Marion ask her shrink for money for dope. (In the book it's $300, not $2000. He sells her for so much less in the book. He goes along with her trips to Big Tim in the book too - that's not just a "Harry's gone, what do I do now??" desperation as it is in the movie.) He knows what's going, and he feels sick about it, but not enough to change or care. After all, she agreed to it - it's on her now too, right? After that he just distances himself from her scoring method – as long as they have a score at all. Anyway. These pages depict his feelings about what he's sent her out to do, why, how he's coping with it (or not), cycling through all of these emotions that he doesn't want to feel, but not wanting to get high because of their limited and insecure supply, but not able to stop... It's a perfect microcosm of his addiction in a long stream of consciousness that just works. It's not pretty - punctuation use is spotty at best, misspellings abound in a kind of patois that supports the stereotyping (ex: Christ is spelled 'krist'), capitalization is iffy, and it's just a mess of chaos... like the lives we're reading about. And it just worked for me.
This style really just dragged me along for the ride and I couldn’t look away. I read about 70% in one sitting yesterday. The way the dialogue was intermixed with the action, and I never knew really who was speaking, or whether it was thought, or hallucination, or dream, or reality only added to the texture. It almost didn't matter, because in the end, their dreams were their reality - more real to them than their reality was, anyway, and somehow the reader gets that.
I'm almost afraid to read Selby's other books now. I feel like writing styles like this should be used sparingly, consciously, and intentionally. They should be used to enhance and transform a particular story into an experience for the reader. This style, which I thought worked perfectly with this story, did that for me. So, if he just writes like this I'd be disappointed, because I'd feel like this wasn't an intentional choice.
I bring this up, because I felt like this after reading (and really enjoying) Saramago's Blindness. The style there worked beautifully with the story being told. But when I looked at other books, and it was the same style even though the stories were vastly different, it just feels gimmicky rather than a deliberate style choice made to fit the story.
Anyway, this book is brilliant and brutal. I loved it, but I don't know if I can recommend it. I love books that make me feel - and this one did, but it's not sunshine and rainbows that I felt, so I'd stay away from this one if that's what you're looking for.