I respect Ajami both for his position at a fabulous graduate school and for the subtlety of his earlier work, especially "Dream Palace of the Arabs." However, this book, which could be titled "Imperial Life in the Emerald City is GREAT" --as a play on Rajiv Chandresekan's journalistic take on the first few years of the American occupation of Iraq. Ajami attempts to focus on the positive effects of the US occupation, but he is a much better historian/critic than journalist/salesman. This book his below him.
He discusses the sincerity and goodness of the US occupation force, yet he fails to point how how grievously wrong the Americans are. Innocence is not an excuse for incompetence. He quotes a soldier from the South who says that he does not understand why, since Iraq has been around since the Bible, Iraq can't be as great as America has made itself in a few hundred years. Ajami references Iraq's artificiality in passing, but he refuses to directly refute flawed assumptions with actual facts that he probably knows. Another example is his insistence on the use of the term "homicide bomber" which was invented by Bush press secretary Ari Fleischer in 2002 and not used anywhere outside of Bush's defenders.
He grossly overrates positive things, despite what really happened. For example he praises Ahmad Chalabi, a pathological liar who combines the blustering arrogance of Donald Trump with the business "savvy" of John Merriweather. In Ajami's telling, Chalabi is the victim of other actors' machinations. Ajami repeatedly references the importance of the tearing down of the Saddam statue in Fidros Square on April 9, 2003 as a crucial event. As we know, 8 years in Iraq later, the statue pull did not change much. In addition, every video of the event is an extremely narrow close-up because few Iraqis actually were at the event. Look online for photos contradicting the crowd there with the crowd in Cairo's Tahrir Square who stood up against Hosni Mubarak. More people were in the crowd for Kanye West at Coachella than were in Fidros Square. More people watched Wiz Khalifa at Coachella than were in Fidros Square.
I am deeply disappointed in this book because I hold Ajami to high expectations. In one scene, he gives a Marine a copy of "The Quiet American" and remarks about how Graham Greene discusses American innocence in the book. Either Ajami does not understand Greene's masterpiece or (more likely) he refuses to engage the full text with the reality of the Iraq occupation because it would so strongly contradict his "American occupation! F*** yeah!" message. TQA is about how American innocence is dangerous. Everyone with an iota of interest in International Studies or US Foreign Policy should read TQA, so I'm not going to launch into a full analysis of the Iraq occupation through Greene's lens.
One scene from the novel does warrant immediate application. An American-supported attack kills a number of Vietnamese civilians. When accused of organizing a literal "homicide bombing" the titular American says, "In a way, they died for democracy." The narrator, a cynical British journalist says, "I wouldn't know how to translate that into Vietnamese." As reality in Iraq proves, despite what Ajami says, the American rationalization for death and destruction cannot be translated into Iraqi Arabic either.