taking this to my Christian family's house at Easter time and reading it there sparked such aggressive debate that i had to take the book out of the room and wait for everyone to calm down.
i picked this book up at a camp with hopes that, as someone who thinks about and bothers people with my thoughts on predestination almost constantly, it would help me get my head around the concept.
that said, chapter 4 'that's not fair!' was definitely the most thought provoking one for me, but not particularly in a good way. maybe it's me and i don't have great enough understanding of all this, but a couple sentences really messed with me. ahem.
'God will have mercy on whom he has mercy, and compassion on whom he has compassion. he has every right to save none of us, since we all deserve hell because of our sins. surely God also has the right to show mercy to whom he wants.
...
don't take issue with God and his justice.'
er specifically that last sentence throws me off because i struggle to just not take issue with something that confuses me. i don't understand how that and free will can possibly coexist.
i also don't love the analogy of austin and his peaches, because in that scenario there was a tangible chance that austin would choose not to eat the peaches. however, in our case with God, there is no possibility of us straying from God's knowledge, because instead of gunning on things happening, he has 100% accurate foresight of our actions.
overall, there was some content that helped me out, but once it got to my burning questions, the same 'blind faith' advice i get given in every scenario was very apparent.