I looked back, but apparently I wasn't reviewing books regularly when I read the first two books in this series. The most dominant thing I remember from the early books is that lycanthropes can smell emotions as food odors. Kind of novel concept.
This book was placed in the same universe, but focused on different characters. Nice for a type of clean start when you don't quite remember the earlier books.
In the end, there were two things that really irritated me about this book. Can't recall if the same complaints apply to the whole series, or not.
1. The lycanthropes.
* They shift by magic, not biology.
* There is no sense of conservation of mass - you can end up with super large or super small lycanthropes, no matter how large or small the human form.
* They only have a full animal form (not a half man/half animal form), yet they can talk as an animal. Guess those vocal cords don't shift. Or they do, since the cats still growl like their natural counterparts. Contradictory.
I know, this is SF/Fantasy. There needs to be a suspension of disbelief, but sometimes authors make it harder than they need to. It's especially confusing since Laurell K. Hamilton mentored these authors. Yet, they went diametrically opposed when it comes to Laurell's attempt to make her lycanthropes follow real biological rules. (Laurell also has a bio degree.)
The magic I could overlook. The talking in animal form was distracting, but ignorable. But the lack of conservation of mass was really annoying.
A snake like lycanthrope appeared to shift into a form as small as a natural snake. Yet, there were beyond life sizes snakes, and a spider. Beyond the gross factor, they almost gave me the old "Batman and Robin" campy vibe. Like I could see the crude animitronics used to move the spider creature around. It didn't feel "lost in fantasy" real, it felt "damn this is bad" old sf campy.
Anyway, completely different argument.
2. Forcing the multicultural thing a bit too hard.
There is a "dear readers" section before chapter 1 which points out their noble goals of multiculturalism and acceptance and can't you hear "We are the World" playing already.
I quote:
One of our goals for this alternate reality is to show that despite our cultural differences, country borders, and prejudices, people are people, whether human, shifter or somewhere in between.
Okay, for one, if you have to point out a dominant theme, you're doing it wrong. And, two, beating someone over the head with a concept, and teaching them about a concept, are two completely different things. This felt like overkill.
No two characters could share a culture or country of origin. And their differences were highlighted, rather than their similarities. The Australian character deliberately used terms that don't exist in either American or British English. So even the English world was highlighted as more different then similar.
It felt like a little kid drawing characters. We'll make this one blue, and this one green, and this one purple.
Last time I heard, the melting pot concept was about showing what we have in common.
Plus, this was preaching. I don't like preaching outside of church. I picked up this book for entertainment, not to be lectured. I'll pick up non-fiction book if I want to be lectured.
So, nice idea, bad execution.
I've had this book sitting on my shelf for some time. (I bought it back in 2006.) I'm not sure I would have reached for it if I didn't already own it. And I'm not sure if I'll continue with this series after this.