Reference Librarianship: Notes from the Trenches

by Charles Robert Anderson

A daily diary of actual interactions between a reference desk librarian and his patrons

Reference Librarianship documents a year in the life of a young librarian working in the “trenches” at a library in the Midwestern United States. This one-of-a-kind book provides a daily diary of every librarian/patron transaction―no matter how mundane or absurd―to demonstrate not only how advances in technology have affected the reference librarian’s job, but how the public’s expectations have changed, as well. The book also includes observations by a now-retired reference librarian on the current state of the field based on these unedited interactions.

Over the past two decades, the job of reference librarian has seen many changes. But in many ways, reference desk work hasn’t changed a bit, with its mix of odd, humorous, routine, and ridiculous requests that capture what it’s like to deal with patrons day after day. Reference Librarianship paints a clear picture of the field for library school students, provides emotional and philosophical support to practitioners, and reminds library administrators of what life was like on the “front lines.”

A sampling of the daily transactions documented in Reference Librarianship :

Monday, May 19, 2003: Reference Librarianship is an enlightening, educational, and entertaining look at the real world of reference desk work. It’s an essential read for reference librarians (both public and academic), library administrators, and library school students, as well as anyone who works with the public.

Genres: Reference

272 pages, Hardcover

First published July 31, 2006

Reviews

[Ken · Rating 3 out of 5]

Reference Librarianship: Notes from the Trenches is made up in large part of a long, long list. An anonymous reference librarian at a public library in the Midwest blogged, in list form, everything that happened during his desk shifts. Reference questions, printer help, odd remarks from patrons, and so forth. The blog is reproduced here, broken up by brief essays that reflect upon the changing world of libraries in the 21st century. The reference desk log becomes a sort of springboard for these essays, although no direct allusions are made to particular incidents in the log.

The result is a bit disappointing. If you are a librarian and you read the professional literature, or even American Libraries, the essays don't say much of anything new. It's more naval-gazing, something at which we librarians are all too skilled. "Things aren't what they used to be!" "Technology is changing everything!" "What is the mission of a library?" "What are we losing, what are we gaining?" And so forth.

If you are not a librarian, or if you haven't read the professional literature for some time, these essays will open your eyes to some of the issues facing libraries today. You'll get a picture of what it's like now, and what quandaries the profession is facing as it looks ahead. Unfortunately, I found the tone of the essays mostly rather sour, except for a concluding couple of pages that were incongruously optimistic.

For practicing librarians who don't see the appeal of these essays, flip through and read some of the blog entries. For the first thirty pages or so, I found it amusing, sometimes laugh-out-loud funny. Not because it's extraordinary, but just the opposite -- we librarians will recognize it right away. This is what we all see every day (especially public librarians), and there is something warm and fuzzy about knowing that our colleagues everywhere share in these experiences. It's all in there -- the interesting questions, the annoying technology issues, and the just plain inexplicable moments.

After around thirty pages, though, the sameness starts to wear. Maybe it would work better reading a few pages of the blog every week (the way it originally must have appeared online!), to keep it fresh. It's just too much, page after page of "printer advice," "copier advice," etc.

Also -- this anonymous librarian strikes me at times as just too embittered. I think that I get this impression because he notes his frustration and repressed anger at certain patrons, complains about being called by his first name, doesn't seem to like kids -- but he almost never makes any positive comments about his experiences as a librarian. After a while, it's almost as wearing as going through a bad day and wondering why you're there in the first place.

[Ayne Ray · Rating 3 out of 5]

Not a great book per se, but certainly a tremendous amount of fun for library geeks. Working in libraries is one of the greatest opportunities available to study humanity in all its myriad forms, and you see everything (seriously, everything) while standing in front of patrons who are capable of asking the most bizarre, fascinating, hilarious, and yes, sometimes tedious and occasionally appalling, questions one can imagine. Having staffed a reference desk primarily at academic and public libraries, sometimes I think I've heard everything, only to be proved both pleasantly and horrifyingly wrong.

[Angel · Rating 2 out of 5]

I was not impressed with this book. The short essays were pretty much a blend of an old time librarian sort of longing for the old days and sort of wishing he could go to library school again so he can be hip now. I detected a small sense of self-pity. Much of the content in the essays are things I have seen expressed in various parts of the librarian blogosphere at one time or another. As for the RefGrunt's diary entries, some were amusing, and some were very mundane. Actually, that part was good until about halfway through the book when you honestly get tired of seeing entries listing "copier advice." While the diary entries do convey the fact that often library reference work can be mundane and boring at times, it also conveys, pure and simple, that a lot of idiots do visit public libraries (they do visit the academic libraries too, trust me on that). And I do say idiots because after a while, no amount of charitable view of life redeems some people. Anyhow, if you basically scan the book, you get the gist of it. If you must, borrow it, but do not buy it.

[Kat · Rating 2 out of 5]

This book amounts to a dozen short essays and long lists of single-line entries. I skipped most of the "ref grunt" entries because I can only stomach so much "She looks asleep, but one finger is tapping. Reboot. I can’t help you until I finish helping her, sir. Reboot." Pretty dry stuff. The essays are a little meatier, but eventually betray the author as a cynical librarian nearing retirement who sees modern-day libraries as bloated mammoths which should be streamlined into distribution centers based on a retail model. It's a disheartening viewpoint which undercuts the educational value of libraries (and library staff) and ignores the importance of libraries as a "third place." Missing is an understanding of the deeper value libraries provide (beyond books on shelves): safe communal spaces, information and computer literacy instruction, and linking people with solid information from trusted sources. There is some valuable perspective in this book, but the majority of its value is in knowing the mindset librarians must fight (from within and without) to justify their jobs.

[Rev. Linda · Rating 5 out of 5]

This title gave me some really good chuckles about Reference Librarianship, particularly since that is what I am now doing in the library world. It is a book filled with questions that were addressed to reference librarians, divided into categories such as "Directional Questions", "The Computer is not Working Here", "The Library as a Retail Outlet", and others that are not just funny, but realistic based on my work so far. Two of my favorites were a patron who was seeking a book on textile manufacturing, but phrased her initial questions as "I need a book about fabrics, like how cotton and wool are made" and another one who asked "Any chance you will get those card catalogs back out again--I always wonder where they went." Glad I was given this book by another reference librarian after I had already entered the profession - if I had read it in graduate school, I am not sure I would have appreciated the humor connected to some very sincere questions.

[Alicia · Rating 3 out of 5]

What a bunch of sour grapes!! At the very least this book gives insight into the mindset of an information specialist very different than mine, and an opportunity to learn how to speak directly to those concerns posed by people like the author.

I found the RefGrunt sections endlessly amusing, though, and I feel that I should apologize to all of the folks to whom I read selections aloud... I've decided that doing something similar could be entertaining, from time to time.

[Agathafrye · Rating 4 out of 5]

Hey! It's the refgrunt guy!

[Terri Palermo · Rating 3 out of 5]

The daily diary sections were hilarious. The essays...not so much. They paint a somewhat scary future for my second career.
Those outside the library realm probably wouldn't enjoy this one too much.

[Erin · Rating 4 out of 5]

Inspired me to create my own daily reference question diary.

[Lydia · Rating 2 out of 5]

Despite the 2006 publishing date, I found the book feeling dated and slightly out of touch with current librarianship.