I had heard so much about Freire that I was quite curious about reading him. One of the worst teachers I have ever met, a privileged snobby person, a bully with zero capacity to listen or learn anything from their students, called themselves a Freire follower and was always talking about the need to give power to students and change the way education happened, all the way being the most despicable/follow the status quo professor I have ever met. So here, I am, with Freire in my hands.
A book of this kind can be analysed in two ways: by its ideas, and by the way it delivers its ideas. (Ok, probably thousands of more ways, but I will choose those two).
First, the delivery. It is quite poor. The basic ideas, language is important, education is a dialogue, the 'powerful' are also 'prisoners' in the system and the ones with less power have to bring the change, are drowned under pages and pages of justification, of Freire (and footnotes by Araujo Freire, his second wife) saying how wonderful their perspective is, how everyone else is wrong, how if people complain to them is because those others don't (want to) make the effort to understand those marvelous ideas, that they have always kept their believes and their goodness, even recognizing their mistakes while others have sold their soul to money, power and the system... It is really grating. A lot of me-me-me, how people love my book, my ideas and how good I am at listening to those with less power... It is so paternalist and annoying.
Let's get then to the ideas. The basic, written above, is good, interesting, worth talking about and developing. However all of it is surrounded by naivety and, again, superiority disguised as a listening ear. There are a lot of messages about the 'powerless', the ones that have to bring the 'revolution', as if these people where a bunch without identities or differences or opinions other than being without power (or race and gender and class, the basic trio). There is a phony idealization in the analysis of the situation, as if those with less power were a unity and the only answer. Really poorly developed. To add insult to injury, Freire inserts little sentences by posh educated privileged people saying things like: 'they know more than us, we learn from them more than they from us', etc, etc. which are the biggest red flag about privileged people who feel superior and want to offer an image influenced by their desire to be Jesus (or a similar figure). Also, seen thirty years after its writing, many of its critiques, ideas and affirmations come out as kind of hilarious/bitter, with Freire so out of touch with reality and the power of the 'system'.
The book also offers little study of some of its affirmations, like the ones relating to Maori language, which he says is being taught in New Zealand, something that would make the reader think that Maori language is, at least, popular in the country. Almost thirty years later, I was with a group of 'privileged educated' New Zealanders, and they didn't know any bar the most basic Maori words, with many saying it was (in their opinion) worthless. I was also with the non privileged and the Maori language/culture was used a lot as a front/kind of a sales presentation, quite a fake show taken without any spirit. Probably other people there understood it in another way. Which shows how difficult it is, even being with-in a culture, much more when you come from another and stay for a short period (or longer) to understand all the intricacies and impact of education and societal changes that happen in it. Think about any 'country': those countries have regions, cities that are quite different, the same with those regions and cities within themselves, etc., etc. Being with fifty, or a hundred, people defending the need to teach, learn and use Provençal language, won't mean the majority of the people really care about it. Without entering about how money co-opts and takes over those desires to protect a language to make it another business.
Etc., etc.
The best: the ideas (few) around language, power, education...
The worst: it feels like a justification with a lot of: they don't understand, they changed, they are extremists, but I am right, right, right; it is quite naive in its approach; the footnotes are quite annoying
Alternatives: Frantz Fanon, Angela Davis, Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw, Lily H. M. Ling, Katharine H.S. Moon, Edward Said, Harmonie Toros...
5/10
(Catalan translation by Eduard Marco and Maria Teresa Reus)