The ONLY reason I think this book isn't rated much lower is the Dr. Seuss name. But stop and think about this: the title is "Amazing Animals" -- and since when were the Dr. Seuss drawings realistic enough to teach concepts like animals? I mean, the thing on the book cover is supposedly called a "bear"... and even the more accurate drawings aren't what I'd call lifelike. The elephant might be decent, but the mouse is a nothing seen in nature, that's for sure.
Furthermore, this book bugs me because it just draws small sections from the good Dr. Seuss books, but is lacking the phraseology, rhythm, story. Lets use our "bear" from the cover again... the actual drawings are from "Hop on Pop" a real classic:
"PAT PAT, they call him Pat"
"PAT HAT, Pat sat on hat"
"PAT CAT, Pat sat on cat"
"PAT BAT, Pat sat on bat"
"NO PAT NO, don't sit on that!"
And that last line is the one where he is about to sit on a cactus. It's terrific. Sing-songy, it teaches word recognition and rhyming. Instead we get a re-written excerpt in this Amazing Animals book:
"A bear
on a chair
(FLAP) No, don't sit there!" -- cactus picture
And for me, growing up with the real Dr. Seuss books, loving them, memorizing passages by default from things like Hop on Pop -- well, I just don't like this derivative work which doesn't measure up. If you want a flip-the-flap book... get something designed for that purpose.