I have marked the book down to 4 stars instead of 5 stars because I think it was a mistake to make the definition of Rascal focus on the author’s particular adoption of beliefs and ideals, rather than being about the Rascal’s own personal ideals and beliefs they are fighting for, which could even be opposite of those the author has adopted, as well as the methods they choose to drive that change based on different personality types. In the end, if you can apply the overall principles to your personal beliefs, convictions, ideals and personality, you can get a lot out of this book.
In the general context of this book, a Rascal is referring to a person who doesn’t just accept convention, the status quo, and live in mediocrity and conformity. Rascals are a type of explorer, seeking to be a catalyst for change and freedom, often on a large scale, ignoring the path of the masses and nay-sayers, or even standing against them. Rascals are a sort of principled rebels with a cause.
The author includes many examples of Rascals throughout history, including the Founding Fathers of the United States, Copernicus, Crazy Horse, Mother Theresa, John Wycliffe, etc. Basically, it is about people who stand up for what they believe in, take action and keep a long-term vision, with dedication.
The purpose of the book is to be very motivational in inspiring the reader to do more than live a life of the 95 percenters of mediocrity and convention, and instead to really live a life of purpose.
You will notice that most of the reviews of this book are polarized between either 5 star or 1 star ratings, with few in between. It should be noted that the reading of this book will offend some people (1-stars). It is very opinionated and indicates that in order to be a true Rascal one must be a devoted Christian with many specific conservative type of values (and religion and political ideals frequently incur high offense taking). Also, I felt that the included Rascal test seems to be very much slanted toward one having what are referred to as Red or Choleric personality traits, though any personality or founding belief could be a catalyst for great positive change. Despite the numerous Bible references and specific political ideals mentioned throughout that are indicated as a necessary part of a rascal, it would be a mistake for a person who disagrees with these to throw away all the information in the book for the few parts they disagree with or which strike a nerve with them. Certainly there are true “Rascals” who have ideals not in conformity with the author’s definition, including those of other beliefs, political ideals, or personalities. The author does even include examples of some Rascals who were not Christian. As the books itself states: “Rascals need to interpret any information and indoctrination critically (including this book).” (p.147-148, Chapter 5) If certain of the authors opinions are counter to yours, simply disagree with them while taking what benefit and good you can out of the book. If the author’s beliefs and ideals do already match yours, you will likely really enjoy the book.