Gorky Park – officially, the Gorky Central Park of Culture and Leisure (Центральный парк культуры и отдыха имени Горького)– plays a role in Moscow life similar to that of Central Park in New York City. In both cases, the park offers green space for rest and renewal in the middle of a major city, along with recreational opportunities. Yet while Gorky Park was named for the Soviet writer Maxim Gorky, it is today best known for its associations with an American writer – Martin Cruz Smith, who made Gorky Park the thematic epicenter, and the title, of one of the best police-procedural novels ever written.
At first glance, there doesn’t seem to be much in Smith’s background that would point ahead toward his writing a series of detective novels set in the Soviet Union and later the Russian Federation. Born in Pennsylvania, Smith is not of Russian or Eastern European heritage; rather, his mother is of Pueblo ancestry and was active in Indigenous Rights movements. Smith’s Native American heritage no doubt influenced the composition of books like Nightwing (1977), a supernatural thriller set on the Hopi Nation, and Stallion Gate (1986), a political suspense novel whose Pueblo protagonist finds himself involved in espionage intrigue in New Mexico at the time of the development of the atomic bomb.
But Smith has always had a strong interest in writing fiction that crosses cultural boundaries – his early writings included a series of mystery novels that featured a Romani or “gypsy” art dealer turned detective – and Gorky Park certainly follows in that tradition.
Published in 1981, in one of the chilliest periods of the Cold War, Gorky Park begins with the discovery of three bodies in the Moscow park that gives the novel its title. What makes this murder different is that the killer sliced off the faces and fingertips of all three victims – a gruesome extra touch that might make it seem, at first, as though the identities of the murder victims could never be discovered.
It is a standard trope of the police procedural to begin with the discovery of the victim(s), and then to move on to the introduction of the detective whose job it will be to solve the murder(s). In the case of Gorky Park, the protagonist is Arkady Renko, a chief investigator for the militsiya, the regular Moscow police. Even before the finding of the Gorky Park corpses, Renko has been having plenty of troubles of his own. His life and work are always placed in the shadow of his father, a notoriously bloodthirsty World War II general who despises his son as “weak.” He has powerful enemies among the KGB. And as if all that weren’t enough, his wife is openly having an affair.
What protects Renko is his excellent work as an investigator, his known loyalty to Russia (though not the Soviet Union), his ability to think on his feet, a Stoic approach to life, and an ironic sense of humour. All of these character traits make him an interesting and sympathetic protagonist – a hero who does not want to be one; a true hero in a society full of false ones.
Renko, through diligent police work, uncovers evidence that one of the Gorky Park victims was an American – a development that would transfer the case from militsiya to KGB jurisdiction, and move him safely off of a politically explosive and dangerous case. And yet, there is a part of him that wants to stay on, to solve the case, even if he sometimes wonders whether he is overthinking the case, making it more complex than it truly is:
Was he a chief investigator or a processor of the dead, an adjunct of the morgue, his paperwork the bureaucratic substitute for last rites? A small point, that, and merely indicative of socialist reality (after all, only Lenin Lives!). More important, career-wise, everyone was right. Unless he became a party apparatchik, he’d gone as far as he ever would. Here and no further. Was it possible – did he have the imagination – to create some elaborate case full of mysterious foreigners, black marketeers and informers, a whole population of fictitious vapors rising off three corpses? All of it a game of the investigator against himself? There was a certain plausibility to that. (p. 102)
As he continues with his investigation, Renko meets a range of vividly rendered supporting characters, all of whom seem to be somehow connected to the Gorky Park murders. Those characters include John Osborne, a wealthy and well-connected American businessman who regularly travels to the U.S.S.R. to purchase Barguzin sables for the fur trade, since the Soviet Union has a monopoly on those sables. William Kirwill, a tough New York City police detective, has come to Moscow in search of his missing brother Jimmy, who may be one of the Gorky Park victims. Irina Asanova, a beautiful young Siberian dissident, also seems to have connections to the victims; and from the disdain with which Renko and Irina invariably speak to each other, it is clear that the two are falling deeply in love.
As mentioned above, the fact of the murder victims lacking faces and fingertips might seem to make positive identification of the victims impossible. Yet – and this is no doubt one of the factors that influenced novelist Smith in composing this novel – the U.S.S.R. was home to a brilliant real-life scientist, an archaeologist and anthropologist named Mikhail M. Gerasimov, who could reconstruct a human face from the bones and tissue left behind after the flesh decayed, and had done so in the case of historical figures like Ivan the Terrible.
In Smith’s Gorky Park, the scientist is one Professor Andreev from the University of Moscow; and while the professor normally (and wisely) stays away from anything that could be considered political, he is intrigued enough in this instance to take on the professional challenge of reconstructing the faces of the Gorky Park victims. Kirwill is singularly dubious regarding this bit of investigative initiative on Renko’s part – “A face from a skull?...Well, this is fascinating, like seeing police procedure in ancient Rome. What’s next, entrails from birds, or do you throw bones?” (p. 204) – but this line of inquiry does produce important results for Renko’s investigation.
Indeed, Renko’s diligent detective work leads him to the killer – and to a stark scene of confrontation when Renko confronts the killer, just as the killer is about to go into a party through the Kremlin’s Trinity Gate. The killer, untouchable at the moment because of his connections among the Soviet nomenklatura, asks whether Renko is really willing to run the risk of making a politically inadvisable arrest, given the depth of corruption throughout Soviet society: “You can’t be willing to die simply to make an arrest to please Soviet justice. Everyone is bought, from the top to the bottom. The whole country’s bought – bought cheap, cheapest in the world. You don’t care about breaking laws, you’re not that stupid anymore. So what is there to die for?” (p. 306)
The killer is right about the endemic corruption of the Soviet Union, as an act of betrayal by a long-time friend and mentor very nearly costs Renko his life, and drops him into the clutches of the KGB into the bargain. Yet even the fanatically politicized agents of the Soviet secret police must acknowledge Renko’s incorruptible honesty; and the dedicated militsiya investigator continues to move closer to final resolution of the Gorky Park case.
And resolving the case, in a nice twist, takes Renko to the other side of the Iron Curtain – to New York City – where the prospect of an exchange involving smuggled goods also holds forth the possibility of freedom in the West for Arkady Renko and Irina Asanova. Yet Renko sees that the prospects for a happy resolution of their dangerous situation are remote at best:
Then he and Irina might not get away. Perhaps the FBI watched the windows of their room all the time. Arkady had never driven an American car; who knew how it worked? They could get lost. Maps, at least in the Soviet Union, were deliberately inaccurate. Perhaps he and Irina were so plainly Russian that everyone would recognize them as fugitives. Besides, he was an ignorant man in a foreign country. (p. 410)
And thus Gorky Park moves toward its suspenseful conclusion, thousands of miles from the park that gave the novel its name.
Smith sets forth the people and events of Gorky Park in what I would call a sort of tough-minded prose poetry. He sketches his characters economically and effectively, and weaves an intricate plot with plenty of authentic surprises. While I quite like the stylish 1983 film adaptation by British director Michael Apted (with Helsinki standing in for Moscow, as Western film crews could not film in Russia in those days), the novel is an ever deeper and richer fictive experience – a marvelous way for post-Cold War readers to be, for a time, back in the U.S.S.R.